Using approach-inhibition theory of power to explain how participative decision-making enhances innovative work behavior of high power distance-oriented employees

IF 3 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Sumaia Farzana, Peerayuth Charoensukmongkol
{"title":"Using approach-inhibition theory of power to explain how participative decision-making enhances innovative work behavior of high power distance-oriented employees","authors":"Sumaia Farzana, Peerayuth Charoensukmongkol","doi":"10.1108/joepp-10-2022-0304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis research study investigated the relationship between participative decision-making and innovative work behavior by considering the moderating role of power distance orientation of individuals. Grounded in the approach-inhibition theory of power, the authors proposed that participative decision-making could mitigate perceived power gap and motivate individuals with high power distance orientation to engage more in innovative work behavior.Design/methodology/approachSurvey data were collected from 243 faculty members from 2 universities located at Dhaka, Bangladesh. The partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was used for data analysis.FindingsThe results from the model estimation showed that the positive relationship between participative decision-making and innovative work behavior was stronger among faculty members with high power distance orientation than those with low power distance orientation. The simple slope analysis also clarified the fact that faculty members with high power distance orientation could increase their innovative work behavior to be at the same level as that of faculty members with low power distance orientation when the members were involved highly in participative decision-making.Practical implicationsParticipative decision-making is a management practice that should be implemented in order to motivate faculty members to actively engage in innovative work behavior. Particularly for faculty members who are sensitive towards the power status of other members in the workplace, this management practice is highly recommended to lessen the perceived social barrier that discourages these faculty members from engaging in innovative work behavior.Originality/valueThe authors' research advanced knowledge from prior studies by offering new theoretical insight into the role of empowerment practice that could motivate individuals with high power distance orientation to engage more in innovative practices.","PeriodicalId":51810,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Effectiveness-People and Performance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Effectiveness-People and Performance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/joepp-10-2022-0304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis research study investigated the relationship between participative decision-making and innovative work behavior by considering the moderating role of power distance orientation of individuals. Grounded in the approach-inhibition theory of power, the authors proposed that participative decision-making could mitigate perceived power gap and motivate individuals with high power distance orientation to engage more in innovative work behavior.Design/methodology/approachSurvey data were collected from 243 faculty members from 2 universities located at Dhaka, Bangladesh. The partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was used for data analysis.FindingsThe results from the model estimation showed that the positive relationship between participative decision-making and innovative work behavior was stronger among faculty members with high power distance orientation than those with low power distance orientation. The simple slope analysis also clarified the fact that faculty members with high power distance orientation could increase their innovative work behavior to be at the same level as that of faculty members with low power distance orientation when the members were involved highly in participative decision-making.Practical implicationsParticipative decision-making is a management practice that should be implemented in order to motivate faculty members to actively engage in innovative work behavior. Particularly for faculty members who are sensitive towards the power status of other members in the workplace, this management practice is highly recommended to lessen the perceived social barrier that discourages these faculty members from engaging in innovative work behavior.Originality/valueThe authors' research advanced knowledge from prior studies by offering new theoretical insight into the role of empowerment practice that could motivate individuals with high power distance orientation to engage more in innovative practices.
运用权力趋近抑制理论解释参与式决策对高权力距离导向员工创新工作行为的促进作用
目的通过考虑个体权力距离取向的调节作用,探讨参与决策与创新工作行为之间的关系。基于权力趋近抑制理论,作者提出参与式决策可以缓解感知到的权力差距,激励具有高权力距离取向的个体更多地参与创新工作行为。设计/方法/方法调查数据收集自孟加拉国达卡2所大学的243名教员。采用偏最小二乘结构方程模型(PLS-SEM)进行数据分析。结果表明:高权力距离取向的教师参与决策与创新工作行为的正向关系强于低权力距离取向的教师。简单斜率分析也表明,当高权力距离取向的教师高度参与参与决策时,其创新工作行为可以提高到与低权力距离取向的教师相同的水平。实践意义参与式决策是一种管理实践,应该实施,以激励教师积极参与创新的工作行为。特别是对于那些对工作场所中其他成员的权力地位敏感的教职员工,强烈推荐这种管理实践来减少阻碍这些教职员工从事创新工作行为的社会障碍。原创性/价值作者的研究通过对授权实践的作用提供了新的理论见解,从而推进了先前研究的知识,这些实践可以激励具有高权力距离取向的个体更多地参与创新实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
31
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信