Formation Damage Assessment and Waterflooding Incompatibility Study for Reduced Sulfate Injection Water

J. Alaamri, Mohammad AlDahlan, I. Al-Yami, A. Alghamdi
{"title":"Formation Damage Assessment and Waterflooding Incompatibility Study for Reduced Sulfate Injection Water","authors":"J. Alaamri, Mohammad AlDahlan, I. Al-Yami, A. Alghamdi","doi":"10.2118/197802-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Waterflooding has always been considered as a favorable technology to support reservoir pressure during production and enhance recovery. The main challenge that needs to be addressed is the increase in scale potential due to incompatibility of mixing two different waters of different physical and chemical properties. Calcium sulfate scaling can form as a result of the reaction of high calcium produced water with high sulfate injection water. Since there is no feasible method that can efficiently be used to reduce the high calcium content in the formation water, treating the injection water by adding scale inhibitor or lowering its sulfate content is of high interest. Reducing the sulfate content physically through RO membranes or chemically through ion exchange methods can be considered a solution.\n In this study, different scenarios for using reduced sulfate simulated injection water (SIW) in addition to untreated SIW have been examined as options for waterflooding prior to field application recommendations. Three different concentrations of reduced sulfate SIW (100, 200 and 300 SO4− ppm) in addition to the untreated SIW with almost 4000 ppm of SO4− were used to study water-water reaction and water-rock interaction. The study scheme included static bottle testing for compatibility of the synthetic flooding water and SPW at different mixing ratios and coreflooding at different temperatures for the water-rock interaction.\n Water-water interaction tests revealed that the reduced sulfate SIW was found to be compatible, and no sign of precipitatation was observed. Untreated SIW showed white precipitates of calcium sulfate when mixed with the high calcium synthetic simulated production water (SPW) at different ratios and temperature. Coreflooding formation damage assessment indicated a reduction in the commercial core plug permeability of less than 12%.\n Reduced sulfate waterflooding can eliminate the risk of calcium sulfate scale formation damage and minimizing scaling mitigation and challenges requirements.","PeriodicalId":11328,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, November 14, 2019","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, November 14, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/197802-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Waterflooding has always been considered as a favorable technology to support reservoir pressure during production and enhance recovery. The main challenge that needs to be addressed is the increase in scale potential due to incompatibility of mixing two different waters of different physical and chemical properties. Calcium sulfate scaling can form as a result of the reaction of high calcium produced water with high sulfate injection water. Since there is no feasible method that can efficiently be used to reduce the high calcium content in the formation water, treating the injection water by adding scale inhibitor or lowering its sulfate content is of high interest. Reducing the sulfate content physically through RO membranes or chemically through ion exchange methods can be considered a solution. In this study, different scenarios for using reduced sulfate simulated injection water (SIW) in addition to untreated SIW have been examined as options for waterflooding prior to field application recommendations. Three different concentrations of reduced sulfate SIW (100, 200 and 300 SO4− ppm) in addition to the untreated SIW with almost 4000 ppm of SO4− were used to study water-water reaction and water-rock interaction. The study scheme included static bottle testing for compatibility of the synthetic flooding water and SPW at different mixing ratios and coreflooding at different temperatures for the water-rock interaction. Water-water interaction tests revealed that the reduced sulfate SIW was found to be compatible, and no sign of precipitatation was observed. Untreated SIW showed white precipitates of calcium sulfate when mixed with the high calcium synthetic simulated production water (SPW) at different ratios and temperature. Coreflooding formation damage assessment indicated a reduction in the commercial core plug permeability of less than 12%. Reduced sulfate waterflooding can eliminate the risk of calcium sulfate scale formation damage and minimizing scaling mitigation and challenges requirements.
还原性硫酸盐注水地层损害评价及水驱不相容研究
水驱一直被认为是一种在生产过程中支撑油藏压力、提高采收率的有利技术。需要解决的主要挑战是由于混合两种不同物理和化学性质的水的不相容性而导致水垢潜力的增加。高钙采出水与高硫酸盐注入水反应可形成硫酸钙结垢。由于没有可行的方法可以有效地降低地层水中的高钙含量,因此通过添加阻垢剂或降低其硫酸盐含量来处理注入水是非常有趣的。通过反渗透膜物理地或通过离子交换方法化学地降低硫酸盐含量可以被认为是一种解决方案。在本研究中,除了未经处理的SIW外,还研究了使用还原硫酸盐模拟注入水(SIW)作为水驱的不同方案,然后给出了现场应用建议。除了SO4 -浓度接近4000 ppm的未处理SIW外,还使用了三种不同浓度的硫酸盐SIW(100、200和300 SO4 - ppm)来研究水-水反应和水-岩相互作用。研究方案包括在不同混合比下对合成驱水与SPW的相容性进行静态瓶试验,以及在不同温度下对水岩相互作用进行岩心驱油。水-水相互作用试验表明,还原的硫酸盐SIW是相容的,没有观察到沉淀的迹象。未处理的SIW与高钙合成模拟生产水(SPW)以不同比例和温度混合后,呈现出白色的硫酸钙沉淀。岩心驱油对地层的损害评估表明,商业岩心塞的渗透率降低了不到12%。减少硫酸盐水驱可以消除硫酸钙结垢地层损害的风险,并最大限度地减少结垢和挑战要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信