“Through Sin Nature Has LostIts Confidence in God” – Sin and Trust as Formative Elementsof Martin Luther’s Conception of Society

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY
Sasja Emilie Mathiasen Stopa
{"title":"“Through Sin Nature Has LostIts Confidence in God” – Sin and Trust as Formative Elementsof Martin Luther’s Conception of Society","authors":"Sasja Emilie Mathiasen Stopa","doi":"10.1515/jemc-2018-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article explores how sin and trust as fundamental notions of Luther’s relational anthropology determine his understanding of social relations unfolding in the hierarchies of the earthly realm. Against scholastic works righteousness, Luther maintains that humans are absolute sinners incapable of justifying themselves through good works and receive faith as a gift of unconditional trust in God. This reformulation of the human relation to God has profound consequences for Luther’s understanding of interpersonal relations. Luther understands the justifying relation to God as a precondition for fruitful and trusting social relations in a world infused by sin. Moreover, Luther patterns his understanding of the hierarchic relations between subjects and their earthly authorities on the trusting relation between God and human beings. However, because of sin individuals need to subject themselves to superiors. In this way, Luther’s understanding of the human being as both righteous and sinful seems to be the reason behind the apparent paradox of hierarchy and equality permeating his conception of society.","PeriodicalId":29688,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Modern Christianity","volume":"103 1","pages":"151 - 171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Early Modern Christianity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jemc-2018-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract This article explores how sin and trust as fundamental notions of Luther’s relational anthropology determine his understanding of social relations unfolding in the hierarchies of the earthly realm. Against scholastic works righteousness, Luther maintains that humans are absolute sinners incapable of justifying themselves through good works and receive faith as a gift of unconditional trust in God. This reformulation of the human relation to God has profound consequences for Luther’s understanding of interpersonal relations. Luther understands the justifying relation to God as a precondition for fruitful and trusting social relations in a world infused by sin. Moreover, Luther patterns his understanding of the hierarchic relations between subjects and their earthly authorities on the trusting relation between God and human beings. However, because of sin individuals need to subject themselves to superiors. In this way, Luther’s understanding of the human being as both righteous and sinful seems to be the reason behind the apparent paradox of hierarchy and equality permeating his conception of society.
“因罪,自然失去了对神的信心”——罪与信是马丁·路德社会观的构成要素
本文探讨了罪和信任作为路德关系人类学的基本概念如何决定了他对在世俗领域的等级中展开的社会关系的理解。反对学术著作的正义,路德坚持认为人类是绝对的罪人,不能通过善行证明自己,也不能把信仰作为无条件信任上帝的礼物来接受。这种对人与上帝关系的重新表述对路德对人际关系的理解产生了深远的影响。路德明白,在一个充满罪的世界里,称义与神的关系是富有成效和信任的社会关系的先决条件。此外,路德将他对臣民和世俗权威之间的等级关系的理解建立在上帝和人类之间的信任关系上。然而,由于罪,个人需要服从上级。这样,路德对人类既是正义的又是罪恶的理解,似乎是他的社会观念中充斥着等级和平等的明显悖论背后的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信