The Relationships between Employee Occupational Self-efficacy, Structural Empowerment, and Work Engagement

I. Žukauskaitė, Dalia Bagdžiūnienė, Rita Rekašiūtė Balsienė
{"title":"The Relationships between Employee Occupational Self-efficacy, Structural Empowerment, and Work Engagement","authors":"I. Žukauskaitė, Dalia Bagdžiūnienė, Rita Rekašiūtė Balsienė","doi":"10.15388/PSICHOL.2019.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays the competitive advantage of any organization mainly relies not only on technologies or material resources but also on competitive, energetic, engaged employees, who are willing to share their knowledge, skills, and experience. Organizations must not only recruit talents but also inspire them and create the conditions in which they reveal themselves and have the prospect for professional growth. According to Bandura (1982), the personal belief of how well one can execute courses of action required to deal with prospective situations may become crucial for work success. The present study integrates Bandura’s (1982; 1989) Social Cognitive, Kanter’s (1977; 1979) Structural Empowerment, and Schaufeli and Bakker’s(2004) Work Engagement theories and is aimed (1) to analyze the relationships between employee occupational self-efficacy, structural empowerment, and work engagement and (2) to determine the role of occupational self-efficacy in the relationships between the elements of structural empowerment and work engagement. \nA total of 1636 specialist level employees from one Lithuanian public sector organization were surveyed online. Ninety four percent of the respondents were female, six percent were male. The average age of the respondents was 45.71 (SD = 10.34) years, with the average of 8.29 (SD = 7.23) years of working experience. All respondents had higher education. Occupational self-efficacy was measured using the Schyns & von Collani (2002) OCCSEEF scale (short version), structural empowerment elements (access to opportunity, information, support, and resources, informal power and formal power) were measured using the Conditions of Work Effectiveness Questionnaire – II (CWEQ – II) (Laschinger, Finegan, Shamian, & Wilk, 2001), and the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9) (Schaufeli, Bakker, & Salanova, 2006) was used to measure work engagement. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was applied to determine the mediating role of occupational self-efficacy in the relationships between elements of structural empowerment and work engagement. \nThe analysis revealed that all dimensions of structural empowerment positively predicted occupational self-efficacy, and that occupational self-efficacy positively predicted work engagement. Formal power directly positively predicted work engagement, occupational self-efficacy fully mediated the relationship between informal power and work engagement and partially mediated the relationships between certain predictors (access to opportinity, information, and resources) and work engagement. \nDespite some limitations (e.g., this being a cross-sectional study, and that specialist level employees were surveyed from one organization), the results of the study highlighted, first, that employee occupational self-efficacy and work engagement might be strengthened by empowering organizational structures, and, second, that occupational self-efficacy is an important personal characteristic explaining the relationships between empowering organizational structures and employee work engagement. Perspectives for future research and practical implications are discussed.","PeriodicalId":33049,"journal":{"name":"Psichologija","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psichologija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/PSICHOL.2019.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Nowadays the competitive advantage of any organization mainly relies not only on technologies or material resources but also on competitive, energetic, engaged employees, who are willing to share their knowledge, skills, and experience. Organizations must not only recruit talents but also inspire them and create the conditions in which they reveal themselves and have the prospect for professional growth. According to Bandura (1982), the personal belief of how well one can execute courses of action required to deal with prospective situations may become crucial for work success. The present study integrates Bandura’s (1982; 1989) Social Cognitive, Kanter’s (1977; 1979) Structural Empowerment, and Schaufeli and Bakker’s(2004) Work Engagement theories and is aimed (1) to analyze the relationships between employee occupational self-efficacy, structural empowerment, and work engagement and (2) to determine the role of occupational self-efficacy in the relationships between the elements of structural empowerment and work engagement. A total of 1636 specialist level employees from one Lithuanian public sector organization were surveyed online. Ninety four percent of the respondents were female, six percent were male. The average age of the respondents was 45.71 (SD = 10.34) years, with the average of 8.29 (SD = 7.23) years of working experience. All respondents had higher education. Occupational self-efficacy was measured using the Schyns & von Collani (2002) OCCSEEF scale (short version), structural empowerment elements (access to opportunity, information, support, and resources, informal power and formal power) were measured using the Conditions of Work Effectiveness Questionnaire – II (CWEQ – II) (Laschinger, Finegan, Shamian, & Wilk, 2001), and the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9) (Schaufeli, Bakker, & Salanova, 2006) was used to measure work engagement. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was applied to determine the mediating role of occupational self-efficacy in the relationships between elements of structural empowerment and work engagement. The analysis revealed that all dimensions of structural empowerment positively predicted occupational self-efficacy, and that occupational self-efficacy positively predicted work engagement. Formal power directly positively predicted work engagement, occupational self-efficacy fully mediated the relationship between informal power and work engagement and partially mediated the relationships between certain predictors (access to opportinity, information, and resources) and work engagement. Despite some limitations (e.g., this being a cross-sectional study, and that specialist level employees were surveyed from one organization), the results of the study highlighted, first, that employee occupational self-efficacy and work engagement might be strengthened by empowering organizational structures, and, second, that occupational self-efficacy is an important personal characteristic explaining the relationships between empowering organizational structures and employee work engagement. Perspectives for future research and practical implications are discussed.
员工职业自我效能感、结构授权与工作投入的关系
如今,任何组织的竞争优势不仅取决于技术或物质资源,还取决于有竞争力、精力充沛、敬业的员工,他们愿意分享自己的知识、技能和经验。组织不仅要招募人才,还要激励他们,创造条件,让他们展现自我,并有职业发展的前景。根据Bandura(1982)的说法,一个人能够很好地执行处理未来情况所需的行动方案的个人信念可能对工作成功至关重要。本研究整合了Bandura (1982;1989)社会认知,坎特(1977);Schaufeli和Bakker(2004)的工作投入理论,旨在(1)分析员工职业自我效能感、结构授权和工作投入之间的关系;(2)确定职业自我效能感在结构授权和工作投入要素之间的关系中的作用。共有来自立陶宛公共部门组织的1636名专家级员工接受了在线调查。94%的受访者是女性,6%是男性。受访者的平均年龄为45.71岁(SD = 10.34)岁,平均工作经验为8.29年(SD = 7.23)年。所有受访者都受过高等教育。使用Schyns & von Collani (2002) OCCSEEF量表(短版)测量职业自我效能,使用工作效能条件问卷- II (CWEQ - II) (Laschinger, Finegan, Shamian, & Wilk, 2001)测量结构性授权要素(获得机会、信息、支持和资源、非正式权力和正式权力),使用乌得勒支工作投入量表(UWES-9) (Schaufeli, Bakker, & Salanova, 2006)测量工作投入。运用结构方程模型(SEM)确定职业自我效能感在结构授权要素与工作投入之间的中介作用。分析发现,结构授权各维度均能正向预测职业自我效能,而职业自我效能正向预测工作投入。正式权力直接正向预测工作投入,职业自我效能完全中介非正式权力与工作投入之间的关系,部分中介某些预测因子(获得机会、信息和资源)与工作投入之间的关系。尽管存在一些局限性(例如,这是一个横断面研究,并且来自一个组织的专家级员工进行了调查),但研究结果强调,首先,员工的职业自我效能感和工作投入可能会通过授权组织结构得到加强,其次,职业自我效能感是解释授权组织结构与员工工作投入之间关系的重要个人特征。最后讨论了未来研究的展望和实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信