Abstract A55: Regional differences in breast cancer biomarkers in American Indian and Alaska Native women

J. Kaur, R. Vierkant, S. Myers
{"title":"Abstract A55: Regional differences in breast cancer biomarkers in American Indian and Alaska Native women","authors":"J. Kaur, R. Vierkant, S. Myers","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.DISP-10-A55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Breast cancer is a major cause of cancer mortality in American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) women. However regional differences are striking with lowers rates in Arizona and highest in Alaska with almost a three-fold difference in incidence and mortality between the two states. These differences may be due in part to varying levels of biologic tumor aggressiveness. To evaluate this, we compared a panel of biomarkers on consecutively diagnosed AIAN breast cancer cases from AZ (N=53) and AK (N=42). Methods: Retrospective analysis of tissue blocks measured expression levels for the following panel of biomarkers: ER and PR (ordinally coded as positive vs. negative); her2, BCL-2, and EGFR (coded 0.1.2. and 3+) and P53, MIB-1 and cyclin D (continuous percent of cells stained). Distributions of biomarker values were compared across state of residence using t-tests for continuous and ordinally scaled markers and chi-square tests of significance for binary markers. Age adjusted analyses were also carried out using linear and logistic regression models as appropriate to account for possible differences in age at diagnosis across states. Chart reviews recorded demographics and treatment characteristics. Results: The following demographics were observed with 95 cases of AIAN women with breast cancer analyzed. Average age at diagnosis was similar in the two states (mean, 58.4 for AZ vs. 56.1 for AK, t-test p value=0.45). 74% presented with a palpable mass. 32% had lumpectomy and axillary node dissection. 28% were premenopausal. 8% had a first-degree relative with breast cancer. 46% received adjuvant chemotherapy. 54% received adjuvant hormonal therapy. Cases from AK had higher levels of p53 staining (40.3 vs. 18.5, p=0.004) and lower levels of both EGFR (mean ordinal scaling 0.15 vs. 0.53, p=0.02) and Her2 (mean ordinal scaling 0.81 vs. 1.32, p=0.02) tan those from AZ. No differences in distribution were observed for MIB-1, Cyclin D, BCL-2, ER or PR. When examined together, the triple negative combination of ER/PR/Her2 also did not differ across states (12% for AK vs.13%forAZ, p=0.85). Conclusions: Our findings indicate that regional differences in biomarker expression levels of P53, EGFR and Her2 may exist in AIAN women. Further research is needed to confirm our results and determine to what extent these differences may explain the observed differences in mortality. Genetic testing for BRCA1,2 or other genetic associations with breast cancer have not been done in these populations and may also be useful to examine the reasons for differences in incidence and mortality. In addition, AIAN women are more likely to present with palpable masses representing higher risk stages of breast cancer. Outreach activities in this population continue to be highly important to change mortality. Supported in part by NCI U01 114609 Spirit of Eagles Community Network Program Citation Information: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010;19(10 Suppl):A55.","PeriodicalId":9487,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Biomarkers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Biomarkers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.DISP-10-A55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Breast cancer is a major cause of cancer mortality in American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) women. However regional differences are striking with lowers rates in Arizona and highest in Alaska with almost a three-fold difference in incidence and mortality between the two states. These differences may be due in part to varying levels of biologic tumor aggressiveness. To evaluate this, we compared a panel of biomarkers on consecutively diagnosed AIAN breast cancer cases from AZ (N=53) and AK (N=42). Methods: Retrospective analysis of tissue blocks measured expression levels for the following panel of biomarkers: ER and PR (ordinally coded as positive vs. negative); her2, BCL-2, and EGFR (coded 0.1.2. and 3+) and P53, MIB-1 and cyclin D (continuous percent of cells stained). Distributions of biomarker values were compared across state of residence using t-tests for continuous and ordinally scaled markers and chi-square tests of significance for binary markers. Age adjusted analyses were also carried out using linear and logistic regression models as appropriate to account for possible differences in age at diagnosis across states. Chart reviews recorded demographics and treatment characteristics. Results: The following demographics were observed with 95 cases of AIAN women with breast cancer analyzed. Average age at diagnosis was similar in the two states (mean, 58.4 for AZ vs. 56.1 for AK, t-test p value=0.45). 74% presented with a palpable mass. 32% had lumpectomy and axillary node dissection. 28% were premenopausal. 8% had a first-degree relative with breast cancer. 46% received adjuvant chemotherapy. 54% received adjuvant hormonal therapy. Cases from AK had higher levels of p53 staining (40.3 vs. 18.5, p=0.004) and lower levels of both EGFR (mean ordinal scaling 0.15 vs. 0.53, p=0.02) and Her2 (mean ordinal scaling 0.81 vs. 1.32, p=0.02) tan those from AZ. No differences in distribution were observed for MIB-1, Cyclin D, BCL-2, ER or PR. When examined together, the triple negative combination of ER/PR/Her2 also did not differ across states (12% for AK vs.13%forAZ, p=0.85). Conclusions: Our findings indicate that regional differences in biomarker expression levels of P53, EGFR and Her2 may exist in AIAN women. Further research is needed to confirm our results and determine to what extent these differences may explain the observed differences in mortality. Genetic testing for BRCA1,2 or other genetic associations with breast cancer have not been done in these populations and may also be useful to examine the reasons for differences in incidence and mortality. In addition, AIAN women are more likely to present with palpable masses representing higher risk stages of breast cancer. Outreach activities in this population continue to be highly important to change mortality. Supported in part by NCI U01 114609 Spirit of Eagles Community Network Program Citation Information: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010;19(10 Suppl):A55.
A55:美洲印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民女性乳腺癌生物标志物的地区差异
简介:乳腺癌是美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民(AIAN)妇女癌症死亡的主要原因。然而,地区差异是惊人的,亚利桑那州的发病率较低,阿拉斯加州的发病率最高,两个州的发病率和死亡率几乎相差三倍。这些差异可能部分是由于不同程度的生物肿瘤侵袭性。为了评估这一点,我们比较了AZ (N=53)和AK (N=42)连续诊断的AIAN乳腺癌病例的一组生物标志物。方法:回顾性分析组织块测量以下生物标志物的表达水平:ER和PR(通常编码为阳性和阴性);her2、BCL-2和EGFR(编码0.1.2)。和3+)和P53, MIB-1和cyclin D(连续百分比的细胞染色)。使用t检验对连续和有序刻度标记进行比较,使用卡方检验对二元标记进行显著性检验。年龄调整分析也酌情使用线性和逻辑回归模型进行,以解释各州诊断年龄可能存在的差异。图表回顾了记录的人口统计学和治疗特征。结果:对95例亚洲女性乳腺癌患者进行了以下统计分析。两州的平均诊断年龄相似(AZ为58.4岁,AK为56.1岁,t检验p值=0.45)。74%表现为可触及的肿块。32%行乳房肿瘤切除术和腋窝淋巴结清扫。28%为绝经前。8%的人有一级亲属患有乳腺癌。46%接受了辅助化疗。54%接受了辅助激素治疗。与AZ患者相比,AK患者的p53染色水平较高(40.3比18.5,p=0.004), EGFR(平均顺序标度0.15比0.53,p=0.02)和Her2(平均顺序标度0.81比1.32,p=0.02)水平较低。在mb -1、Cyclin D、BCL-2、ER或PR的分布上没有差异。当一起检查时,ER/PR/Her2的三阴性组合在各州之间也没有差异(AK为12%,AZ为13%,p=0.85)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在亚洲女性中,P53、EGFR和Her2的生物标志物表达水平可能存在区域差异。需要进一步的研究来证实我们的结果,并确定这些差异在多大程度上可以解释观察到的死亡率差异。在这些人群中还没有进行BRCA1、2或其他与乳腺癌相关的基因检测,也可能有助于检查发病率和死亡率差异的原因。此外,亚洲妇女更有可能出现可触及的肿块,这代表了乳腺癌的高风险阶段。在这一人群中开展外联活动对改变死亡率仍然非常重要。部分由NCI U01 114609老鹰精神社区网络项目支持。引文信息:癌症流行病学生物标志物pre 2010;19(10增刊):A55。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信