Antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infection across a national primary care network in 2019.

Sabrina Wong, Shanika Rajapakshe, D. Barber, A. Patey, W. Levinson, R. Morkem, Gillian Hurwitz, Kimberly Wintermute, J. Leis
{"title":"Antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infection across a national primary care network in 2019.","authors":"Sabrina Wong, Shanika Rajapakshe, D. Barber, A. Patey, W. Levinson, R. Morkem, Gillian Hurwitz, Kimberly Wintermute, J. Leis","doi":"10.14745/ccdr.v48i04a06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nRespiratory tract infection (RTI) is the leading reason for avoidable antimicrobial use in primary care, yet provider-level feedback on its use is only available in some provinces. The aim of this study was to validate case definitions for RTI across the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN) and determine baseline provider-level variability in antimicrobial prescribing in 2019.\n\n\nMethods\nThe RTI case definitions were developed using demographic, diagnostic coding and keywords in electronic medical record. Manual chart abstraction was performed to identify cases of acute otitis media. Remaining RTI definitions were validated using a random sample of 5,164 patients with encounters in 2019. The proportion of patients with an RTI treated with antibiotics was determined by provider, per patient, per episode and per patient encounter.\n\n\nResults\nNegative predictive value, positive predictive value and prevalence were as follows: 1.00 (0.99-1.00), 0.99 (0.96-0.99) and 4.14% (4.10-4.19) for common cold; 1.00 (0.99-1.00), 0.94 (0.88-0.98) and 1.09% (1.07-1.12) for acute otitis media; 0.98 (0.96-1.00), 0.93 (0.87-0.97) and 1.2% (1.18-1.22) for acute pharyngitis; 0.99 (0.99-1.00), 0.88 (0.81-0.93) and 1.99% (1.96-2.02) for sinusitis; 0.99 (0.97-0.99), 0.95 (0.89-0.98) and 4.01% (3.97-4.05) for acute bronchitis/asthma. By provider, median (interquartile range [IQR]) proportion treated with antibiotics (per patient) was 6.72 (14.92) for common cold, 64.29 (40.00) for acute otitis media, 20.00 (38.89) for pharyngitis, 54.17 (38.09) for sinusitis, 8.33 (20.00) for acute bronchitis/asthma and 21.10 (20.56) for overall RTI.\n\n\nConclusion\nThe CPCSSN can provide national surveillance of antimicrobial prescribing practices for RTI across primary care. Baseline variability underscores the need for provider feedback and quality improvement.","PeriodicalId":94304,"journal":{"name":"Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada","volume":"45 1","pages":"157-163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14745/ccdr.v48i04a06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background Respiratory tract infection (RTI) is the leading reason for avoidable antimicrobial use in primary care, yet provider-level feedback on its use is only available in some provinces. The aim of this study was to validate case definitions for RTI across the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN) and determine baseline provider-level variability in antimicrobial prescribing in 2019. Methods The RTI case definitions were developed using demographic, diagnostic coding and keywords in electronic medical record. Manual chart abstraction was performed to identify cases of acute otitis media. Remaining RTI definitions were validated using a random sample of 5,164 patients with encounters in 2019. The proportion of patients with an RTI treated with antibiotics was determined by provider, per patient, per episode and per patient encounter. Results Negative predictive value, positive predictive value and prevalence were as follows: 1.00 (0.99-1.00), 0.99 (0.96-0.99) and 4.14% (4.10-4.19) for common cold; 1.00 (0.99-1.00), 0.94 (0.88-0.98) and 1.09% (1.07-1.12) for acute otitis media; 0.98 (0.96-1.00), 0.93 (0.87-0.97) and 1.2% (1.18-1.22) for acute pharyngitis; 0.99 (0.99-1.00), 0.88 (0.81-0.93) and 1.99% (1.96-2.02) for sinusitis; 0.99 (0.97-0.99), 0.95 (0.89-0.98) and 4.01% (3.97-4.05) for acute bronchitis/asthma. By provider, median (interquartile range [IQR]) proportion treated with antibiotics (per patient) was 6.72 (14.92) for common cold, 64.29 (40.00) for acute otitis media, 20.00 (38.89) for pharyngitis, 54.17 (38.09) for sinusitis, 8.33 (20.00) for acute bronchitis/asthma and 21.10 (20.56) for overall RTI. Conclusion The CPCSSN can provide national surveillance of antimicrobial prescribing practices for RTI across primary care. Baseline variability underscores the need for provider feedback and quality improvement.
2019年全国初级保健网络中呼吸道感染的抗生素处方。
背景:呼吸道感染(RTI)是在初级保健中使用可避免的抗微生物药物的主要原因,但仅在一些省份可获得提供者层面的使用反馈。本研究的目的是验证加拿大初级保健哨点监测网络(cpcsn)中RTI的病例定义,并确定2019年抗微生物药物处方的基线提供者水平变异性。方法采用人口学、诊断编码和电子病历关键词对RTI病例进行定义。采用手工抽象化的方法来识别急性中耳炎病例。剩余的RTI定义使用2019年5164例遭遇患者的随机样本进行验证。接受抗生素治疗的RTI患者比例由提供者、每位患者、每次发作和每次就诊确定。结果普通感冒阴性预测值、阳性预测值和患病率分别为1.00(0.99 ~ 1.00)、0.99(0.96 ~ 0.99)和4.14% (4.10 ~ 4.19);急性中耳炎1.00(0.99 ~ 1.00)、0.94(0.88 ~ 0.98)、1.09% (1.07 ~ 1.12);急性咽炎为0.98(0.96-1.00)、0.93(0.87-0.97)、1.2% (1.18-1.22);鼻窦炎为0.99(0.99 ~ 1.00)、0.88(0.81 ~ 0.93)、1.99% (1.96 ~ 2.02);急性支气管炎/哮喘分别为0.99(0.97-0.99)、0.95(0.89-0.98)和4.01%(3.97-4.05)。按提供者划分,接受抗生素治疗的比例中位数(四分位间距[IQR])(每名患者)为:普通感冒6.72(14.92),急性中耳炎64.29(40.00),咽炎20.00(38.89),鼻窦炎54.17(38.09),急性支气管炎/哮喘8.33(20.00),整体呼吸道感染21.10(20.56)。结论cpcsn可为RTI基层医疗机构抗菌药物处方实践提供全国性监测。基线可变性强调了对提供者反馈和质量改进的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信