Assessment of multiple precipitation interpolation methods and uncertainty analysis of hydrological models in Chaohe River basin, China

IF 1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 WATER RESOURCES
Binbin Guo, Jing Zhang, Tingbao Xu, Yongyu Song, Mingliang Liu, Zhong Dai
{"title":"Assessment of multiple precipitation interpolation methods and uncertainty analysis of hydrological models in Chaohe River basin, China","authors":"Binbin Guo, Jing Zhang, Tingbao Xu, Yongyu Song, Mingliang Liu, Zhong Dai","doi":"10.17159/wsa/2022.v48.i3.3884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Precipitation interpolation is widely used to generate continuous rainfall surfaces for hydrological simulations. However, increasing the precision of values at the unknown points generated by different spatial interpolation methods is challenging. This study used the Chaohe River Basin, which is an important source of Beijing’s drinking water, as a research area to comprehensively evaluate several precipitation interpolation methods (Thiessen polygon, inverse distance weighting, ordinary kriging and ANUSPLIN) for inputs in hydrological simulations. This research showed that the precipitation time-series surface generated using the ANUSPLIN interpolation method had higher accuracy and reliability. Using this precipitation input to drive the hydrological models, we explored the parameter uncertainties of four typical hydrological models (GR4J, IHACRES, Sacramento and MIKE SHE) based on the multi-objective generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) method. The GLUE method was used to study the parameter sensitivity and uncertainty of the model. Results showed that the ANUSPLIN precipitation interpolation surface combined with the Sacramento model performed best. The multi-objective GLUE method had obvious advantages in parameter uncertainty analysis in hydrological models. Simultaneously exploring the convex line and point density distributions of the behavioural parameters with multi-objective functions determined their distribution and sensitivity more effectively.","PeriodicalId":23623,"journal":{"name":"Water SA","volume":"93 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water SA","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/wsa/2022.v48.i3.3884","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Precipitation interpolation is widely used to generate continuous rainfall surfaces for hydrological simulations. However, increasing the precision of values at the unknown points generated by different spatial interpolation methods is challenging. This study used the Chaohe River Basin, which is an important source of Beijing’s drinking water, as a research area to comprehensively evaluate several precipitation interpolation methods (Thiessen polygon, inverse distance weighting, ordinary kriging and ANUSPLIN) for inputs in hydrological simulations. This research showed that the precipitation time-series surface generated using the ANUSPLIN interpolation method had higher accuracy and reliability. Using this precipitation input to drive the hydrological models, we explored the parameter uncertainties of four typical hydrological models (GR4J, IHACRES, Sacramento and MIKE SHE) based on the multi-objective generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) method. The GLUE method was used to study the parameter sensitivity and uncertainty of the model. Results showed that the ANUSPLIN precipitation interpolation surface combined with the Sacramento model performed best. The multi-objective GLUE method had obvious advantages in parameter uncertainty analysis in hydrological models. Simultaneously exploring the convex line and point density distributions of the behavioural parameters with multi-objective functions determined their distribution and sensitivity more effectively.
潮河流域多种降水插值方法评价及水文模型的不确定性分析
降水插值被广泛应用于水文模拟中生成连续降雨面。然而,如何提高不同空间插值方法生成的未知点上的值的精度是一个挑战。本研究以北京市重要的饮用水源巢河流域为研究区域,综合评价了几种降水插值方法(Thiessen多边形、逆距离加权、普通克里格和ANUSPLIN)在水文模拟中的输入。研究表明,采用ANUSPLIN插值方法生成的降水时间序列面具有较高的精度和可靠性。利用降水输入驱动水文模型,基于多目标广义似然不确定性估计(GLUE)方法,探讨了GR4J、ihaacres、Sacramento和MIKE SHE 4种典型水文模型的参数不确定性。采用GLUE方法对模型的参数敏感性和不确定性进行了研究。结果表明,结合萨克拉门托模型的ANUSPLIN降水插值面效果最好。多目标GLUE方法在水文模型参数不确定性分析中具有明显优势。同时用多目标函数探索行为参数的凸线和点密度分布,更有效地确定了它们的分布和灵敏度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Water SA
Water SA 环境科学-水资源
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
46
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: WaterSA publishes refereed, original work in all branches of water science, technology and engineering. This includes water resources development; the hydrological cycle; surface hydrology; geohydrology and hydrometeorology; limnology; salinisation; treatment and management of municipal and industrial water and wastewater; treatment and disposal of sewage sludge; environmental pollution control; water quality and treatment; aquaculture in terms of its impact on the water resource; agricultural water science; etc. Water SA is the WRC’s accredited scientific journal which contains original research articles and review articles on all aspects of water science, technology, engineering and policy. Water SA has been in publication since 1975 and includes articles from both local and international authors. The journal is issued quarterly (4 editions per year).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信