Disparities of Self-compassion and Job Satisfaction across Decision-Making Styles among Filipino Workers

Marielle R. Potente, Rochelle Anne U. Caraig, Kayze Kein B. Panibe, J. Dominguez
{"title":"Disparities of Self-compassion and Job Satisfaction across Decision-Making Styles among Filipino Workers","authors":"Marielle R. Potente, Rochelle Anne U. Caraig, Kayze Kein B. Panibe, J. Dominguez","doi":"10.24167/psidim.v22i1.5326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Self-compassion and job satisfaction of Filipino workers across their decision-making styles are constructs of the present study being presented in the field of work. This paper aimed to identify the decision-making style; describe and measure the degree of self-compassion and job satisfaction; and determine the difference in self-compassion and job satisfaction across decision-making styles among respondents. The General Decision-making Styles Questionnaire (GDSQ), Self-compassion Scale, and Job Satisfaction Survey were administered to 359 respondents who aged from 28-60 years old, regardless of gender, across different companies in Calabarzon. The respondents were employees from entry level positions, supervisors, as well as executive level positions. Results have shown that rational, intuitive, dependent, avoidant, spontaneous, and dependent were the decision-making styles among respondents. The degree of self-compassion was at a high level (M=142.78, SD=21.16), while the degree of job satisfaction showed respondents’ ambivalence towards their job (M=3.51, SD=0.46). The Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) confirmed a significant difference (Fobt= 5.054**, p of 0.0001) in the self-compassion and job satisfaction across decision-making styles among Filipino workers and was validated by Fisher’s LSD as a post hoc test. Outcomes of the study is recommended as a basis in proposing intervention programs in human resource management and industrial psychology. Mixed-method research is recommended to strengthen the concepts of self-compassion and related variables in this study.","PeriodicalId":31993,"journal":{"name":"Psikodimensia Kajian Ilmiah Psikologi","volume":"177 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psikodimensia Kajian Ilmiah Psikologi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24167/psidim.v22i1.5326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Self-compassion and job satisfaction of Filipino workers across their decision-making styles are constructs of the present study being presented in the field of work. This paper aimed to identify the decision-making style; describe and measure the degree of self-compassion and job satisfaction; and determine the difference in self-compassion and job satisfaction across decision-making styles among respondents. The General Decision-making Styles Questionnaire (GDSQ), Self-compassion Scale, and Job Satisfaction Survey were administered to 359 respondents who aged from 28-60 years old, regardless of gender, across different companies in Calabarzon. The respondents were employees from entry level positions, supervisors, as well as executive level positions. Results have shown that rational, intuitive, dependent, avoidant, spontaneous, and dependent were the decision-making styles among respondents. The degree of self-compassion was at a high level (M=142.78, SD=21.16), while the degree of job satisfaction showed respondents’ ambivalence towards their job (M=3.51, SD=0.46). The Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) confirmed a significant difference (Fobt= 5.054**, p of 0.0001) in the self-compassion and job satisfaction across decision-making styles among Filipino workers and was validated by Fisher’s LSD as a post hoc test. Outcomes of the study is recommended as a basis in proposing intervention programs in human resource management and industrial psychology. Mixed-method research is recommended to strengthen the concepts of self-compassion and related variables in this study.
自我同情与工作满意度在决策风格上的差异
菲律宾工人的自我同情和工作满意度是本研究在工作领域提出的结构。本文旨在识别决策风格;描述和测量自我同情和工作满意度的程度;并确定不同决策风格的受访者在自我同情和工作满意度方面的差异。采用通用决策风格问卷(GDSQ)、自我同情量表(Self-compassion Scale)和工作满意度问卷(Job Satisfaction Survey)对来自卡拉巴松市不同公司的359名年龄在28-60岁之间的受访者进行问卷调查。受访者包括入门级职位的员工、主管以及行政级别职位的员工。结果表明:理性、直觉、依赖、回避、自发和依赖是被调查者的决策风格。自我同情程度较高(M=142.78, SD=21.16),工作满意度反映了被调查者对工作的矛盾心理(M=3.51, SD=0.46)。多变量方差分析(MANOVA)证实了菲律宾工人在不同决策风格的自我同情和工作满意度方面存在显著差异(Fobt= 5.054**, p = 0.0001),并通过Fisher’s LSD作为事后检验进行了验证。本研究结果可作为人力资源管理和工业心理学干预方案的基础。本研究建议采用混合研究方法来强化自我同情的概念和相关变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信