Technology Transfer from Public Research Institute to Community: A Case Study

W. Hermawati
{"title":"Technology Transfer from Public Research Institute to Community: A Case Study","authors":"W. Hermawati","doi":"10.14203/STIPM.2019.150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public funded research and development (R&D) institutes need to play a more active role in maximizing the utilization of their innovation/research results. One of the benefits of R&D innovation result is in the form of economic, social, environmental and cultural benefits for the improvement of human quality of life. Drawing from evidence of the case studies of R&D projects at Public Research Institute ‘A’ in Indonesia, we examined the technology transfer mechanisms into practical applications of the community. The mixed-method with good blend of qualitative and quantitative analysis is used in the case study. The case study demonstrates that there are five types of mechanisms for the technology transfer in this institution namely: direct transfer, through cooperation and interaction with multi stakeholders, patent and licensing, document transfer, and dissemination activities. The success of technology transfer to community were demonstrated by the increased ability of SMEs and farmers to replicate the technologies, increased their production, enlarge their market as well as increased new knowledge, skills, productivity, fertility of their rice fields, and decreased the use of chemical fertilizers by 40% and increased their household’s income by average about 30%.Keywords: technology transfer, public research institutes, communities, innovation","PeriodicalId":31881,"journal":{"name":"STIPM STI Policy and Management Journal","volume":"102 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STIPM STI Policy and Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14203/STIPM.2019.150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Public funded research and development (R&D) institutes need to play a more active role in maximizing the utilization of their innovation/research results. One of the benefits of R&D innovation result is in the form of economic, social, environmental and cultural benefits for the improvement of human quality of life. Drawing from evidence of the case studies of R&D projects at Public Research Institute ‘A’ in Indonesia, we examined the technology transfer mechanisms into practical applications of the community. The mixed-method with good blend of qualitative and quantitative analysis is used in the case study. The case study demonstrates that there are five types of mechanisms for the technology transfer in this institution namely: direct transfer, through cooperation and interaction with multi stakeholders, patent and licensing, document transfer, and dissemination activities. The success of technology transfer to community were demonstrated by the increased ability of SMEs and farmers to replicate the technologies, increased their production, enlarge their market as well as increased new knowledge, skills, productivity, fertility of their rice fields, and decreased the use of chemical fertilizers by 40% and increased their household’s income by average about 30%.Keywords: technology transfer, public research institutes, communities, innovation
公共研究机构向社区的技术转移:个案研究
公共资助的研究与开发机构需要在最大限度地利用其创新/研究成果方面发挥更积极的作用。研发创新成果的效益之一是以经济效益、社会效益、环境效益和文化效益的形式为人类生活质量的提高带来的。根据印度尼西亚公共研究所“A”的研发项目案例研究的证据,我们研究了将技术转移到社区实际应用中的机制。案例研究采用定性分析和定量分析相结合的混合方法。案例研究表明,该机构的技术转移机制有五种类型,即:直接转移、通过与多方利益相关者的合作和互动、专利和许可、文件转移和传播活动。向社区转让技术的成功体现在:中小企业和农民复制技术的能力增强,产量增加,市场扩大,新知识、技能、生产力和稻田肥力增加,化肥使用量减少40%,家庭收入平均增加约30%。关键词:技术转移,公共研究机构,社区,创新
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信