Brexit - Between the Ideology of Euroscepticism and the 'Innocence' of the Treaty on European Union

Cristian Bocancea
{"title":"Brexit - Between the Ideology of Euroscepticism and the 'Innocence' of the Treaty on European Union","authors":"Cristian Bocancea","doi":"10.18662/upalaw/65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Built on the values of freedom and prosperity, democracy and peace, the European Union has created over time a huge constitutional framework, culminating in the Lisbon Treaty, adopted in 2007 and known as the Treaty on European Union. It reflected the will of the then 27 Member States to live together in a cohesive society, guided by the principle of subsidiarity, and to offer neighboring countries the opportunity to join the Union. As regards EU enlargement, the procedure was laid down in principle in Article 49 TEU; for reasons of symmetry, the Treaty introduced Article 50 to cover the possible scenario of a Member State leaving the Union. Although no one expected it, Article 50 TEU was activated by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland following a referendum on the so-called Brexit in the summer of 2016. At the beginning of 2020, after lengthy negotiations, the British - Eurosceptics who had made a discordant note for 43 years in the implementation of common policies - effectively left the EU, hoping for a better life and leaving us to reflect on the \"innocence\" of a treaty article drafted from too much democracy.","PeriodicalId":30571,"journal":{"name":"Polis Revista de Stiinte Politice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polis Revista de Stiinte Politice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18662/upalaw/65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Built on the values of freedom and prosperity, democracy and peace, the European Union has created over time a huge constitutional framework, culminating in the Lisbon Treaty, adopted in 2007 and known as the Treaty on European Union. It reflected the will of the then 27 Member States to live together in a cohesive society, guided by the principle of subsidiarity, and to offer neighboring countries the opportunity to join the Union. As regards EU enlargement, the procedure was laid down in principle in Article 49 TEU; for reasons of symmetry, the Treaty introduced Article 50 to cover the possible scenario of a Member State leaving the Union. Although no one expected it, Article 50 TEU was activated by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland following a referendum on the so-called Brexit in the summer of 2016. At the beginning of 2020, after lengthy negotiations, the British - Eurosceptics who had made a discordant note for 43 years in the implementation of common policies - effectively left the EU, hoping for a better life and leaving us to reflect on the "innocence" of a treaty article drafted from too much democracy.
英国脱欧——介于欧洲怀疑主义意识形态和欧盟条约的“清白”之间
在自由与繁荣、民主与和平的价值观基础上,欧盟长期以来创造了一个庞大的宪法框架,并在2007年通过的《里斯本条约》(Lisbon Treaty)中达到高潮,该条约被称为《欧盟条约》(Treaty on European Union)。它反映了当时27个成员国在辅助性原则指导下在一个有凝聚力的社会中共同生活的意愿,并为邻国提供加入联盟的机会。关于欧盟的扩大,该程序已在第49条TEU中原则上规定;出于对称的原因,该条约引入了第50条,以涵盖一个成员国离开欧盟的可能情况。尽管没有人预料到,但在2016年夏天所谓的英国脱欧公投之后,大不列颠及北爱尔兰联合王国启动了第50条TEU。2020年初,经过漫长的谈判,英国人——43年来在执行共同政策方面一直发出不和谐声音的欧洲怀疑论者——实际上离开了欧盟,希望过上更好的生活,让我们反思一项由过多民主起草的条约条款的“天真”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信