Opposing the Spanish Match: Thomas Scott’s Vox Populi (1620)

IF 0.1 3区 社会学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES
L. Recio
{"title":"Opposing the Spanish Match: Thomas Scott’s Vox Populi (1620)","authors":"L. Recio","doi":"10.34136/sederi.2009.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The beginning of negotiations in 1614 for a dynastic marriage between Prince Charles and the Infanta Maria of Spain caused great concern among English people who still held strong anti-Catholic and anti-Spanish prejudices. King James’s decision in 1618 to use the marriage negotiations in order to mediate in the confessional conflict in Europe added to this concern. England was then politically divided between those willing to help James’s son-in-law, Frederick, who had accepted the Bohemian crown following the rebellion of the Protestant estates against the Habsburg King Ferdinand, and those who supported the Stuart monarch’s decision to keep England safe from continental struggles. Despite the censorship of the state, a group of writers began a campaign against the Spanish Match which had a great influence on public opinion. Among the most prominent of these was Thomas Scott, whose first work, Vox Populi (1620), became one of the most controversial political tracts of the period. This article analyses Scott’s pamphlet and considers how he also made use of the discourse against Catholicism and Spain to introduce further commentaries on the monarchical system and the citizens’ right to participate in government.","PeriodicalId":41004,"journal":{"name":"SEDERI-Yearbook of the Spanish and Portuguese Society for English Renaissance Studies","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SEDERI-Yearbook of the Spanish and Portuguese Society for English Renaissance Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34136/sederi.2009.1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

The beginning of negotiations in 1614 for a dynastic marriage between Prince Charles and the Infanta Maria of Spain caused great concern among English people who still held strong anti-Catholic and anti-Spanish prejudices. King James’s decision in 1618 to use the marriage negotiations in order to mediate in the confessional conflict in Europe added to this concern. England was then politically divided between those willing to help James’s son-in-law, Frederick, who had accepted the Bohemian crown following the rebellion of the Protestant estates against the Habsburg King Ferdinand, and those who supported the Stuart monarch’s decision to keep England safe from continental struggles. Despite the censorship of the state, a group of writers began a campaign against the Spanish Match which had a great influence on public opinion. Among the most prominent of these was Thomas Scott, whose first work, Vox Populi (1620), became one of the most controversial political tracts of the period. This article analyses Scott’s pamphlet and considers how he also made use of the discourse against Catholicism and Spain to introduce further commentaries on the monarchical system and the citizens’ right to participate in government.
反对西班牙的比赛:托马斯·斯科特的《人民的呼声》(1620年)
1614年,查尔斯王子和西班牙的玛丽亚公主开始就王室婚姻进行谈判,这引起了英国人的极大关注,因为他们仍然抱有强烈的反天主教和反西班牙偏见。1618年,詹姆斯国王决定用婚姻谈判来调解欧洲的忏悔冲突,这加剧了这种担忧。当时的英格兰在政治上分裂为两派,一派支持詹姆斯的女婿腓特烈,腓特烈在新教阶层反抗哈布斯堡国王费迪南德后接受了波西米亚人的王位,另一派支持斯图亚特王朝的决定,使英格兰免受大陆斗争的影响。尽管国家实行审查制度,一群作家还是发起了一场反对《西班牙竞赛》的运动,这场运动对公众舆论产生了巨大影响。其中最著名的是托马斯·斯科特(Thomas Scott),他的第一部作品《人民的呼声》(Vox Populi, 1620)成为当时最具争议的政治小册子之一。本文分析了斯科特的小册子,并考虑了他如何利用反对天主教和西班牙的话语来引入对君主制度和公民参与政府权利的进一步评论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: SEDERI, Yearbook of the Spanish and Portuguese Society for English Renaissance Studies, is an annual open-access publication devoted to current criticism and scholarship on English Renaissance Studies. It is peer-reviewed by external referees, following a double-blind policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信