Abnormal retention of s-triazine herbicides on porous graphitic carbon

IF 3.6 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Oksana I. Grinevich, Z. Khesina, A. Buryak
{"title":"Abnormal retention of s-triazine herbicides on porous graphitic carbon","authors":"Oksana I. Grinevich, Z. Khesina, A. Buryak","doi":"10.1515/revac-2022-0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Porous graphitic carbon (PGC) is a widely used stationary phase for reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) that allows separation of structurally similar compounds retained in mixed form on a flat graphite surface. Such a stationary phase can be used in analytical chemistry to provide good separation and selectivity in pesticide monitoring. In this article, we studied the chromatographic behavior of five common triazine herbicides (simazine, atrazine, desmetryn, propazine, prometryn) on PGC vis-à-vis octadecyl-functionalized silica gel (ODS). It was found that the herbicides studied have an abnormal elution order on PGC compared to ODS. PGC was also characterized by higher selectivity of analyte separation. This behavior of triazine herbicides on PGC cannot be explained either with the help of existing theory or by mathematical modeling of adsorption processes on graphite. Therefore, we have proposed a possible retention mechanism, explaining the effects observed, due to the shielding of the amino group in the triazine ring by alkyl substituents, which decreases the “polar retention effect” of PGC. Satisfactory separation efficacy was obtained with the proposed analytical method, using convenient UV-detection and without resort to laborious techniques such as HPLC coupled with mass spectrometry.","PeriodicalId":21090,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Analytical Chemistry","volume":"111 1","pages":"1 - 9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/revac-2022-0029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Porous graphitic carbon (PGC) is a widely used stationary phase for reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) that allows separation of structurally similar compounds retained in mixed form on a flat graphite surface. Such a stationary phase can be used in analytical chemistry to provide good separation and selectivity in pesticide monitoring. In this article, we studied the chromatographic behavior of five common triazine herbicides (simazine, atrazine, desmetryn, propazine, prometryn) on PGC vis-à-vis octadecyl-functionalized silica gel (ODS). It was found that the herbicides studied have an abnormal elution order on PGC compared to ODS. PGC was also characterized by higher selectivity of analyte separation. This behavior of triazine herbicides on PGC cannot be explained either with the help of existing theory or by mathematical modeling of adsorption processes on graphite. Therefore, we have proposed a possible retention mechanism, explaining the effects observed, due to the shielding of the amino group in the triazine ring by alkyl substituents, which decreases the “polar retention effect” of PGC. Satisfactory separation efficacy was obtained with the proposed analytical method, using convenient UV-detection and without resort to laborious techniques such as HPLC coupled with mass spectrometry.
s-三嗪类除草剂在多孔石墨碳上的异常滞留
多孔石墨碳(PGC)是一种广泛应用于反相高效液相色谱(HPLC)的固定相,它允许在平坦的石墨表面上分离以混合形式保留的结构相似的化合物。该固定相可用于分析化学,为农药监测提供良好的分离和选择性。本文研究了五种常见的三嗪类除草剂(西马津、阿特拉津、去咪嗪、丙嗪、prometryn)在PGC - -à-vis十八烷基功能化硅胶(ODS)上的色谱行为。与ODS相比,所研究的除草剂对PGC的洗脱顺序异常。PGC还具有较高的分析物分离选择性。三嗪类除草剂在PGC上的这种行为既不能用现有的理论来解释,也不能用石墨吸附过程的数学模型来解释。因此,我们提出了一种可能的保留机制,解释了所观察到的效应,由于烷基取代基屏蔽了三嗪环上的氨基,从而降低了PGC的“极性保留效应”。该分析方法采用简便的紫外检测,无需采用HPLC -质谱联用等繁琐的技术,获得了满意的分离效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reviews in Analytical Chemistry
Reviews in Analytical Chemistry 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Reviews in Analytical Chemistry publishes authoritative reviews by leading experts in the dynamic field of chemical analysis. The subjects can encompass all branches of modern analytical chemistry such as spectroscopy, chromatography, mass spectrometry, electrochemistry and trace analysis and their applications to areas such as environmental control, pharmaceutical industry, automation and other relevant areas. Review articles bring the expert up to date in a concise manner and provide researchers an overview of new techniques and methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信