A benchmark for the evaluation of RGB-D SLAM systems

Jürgen Sturm, Nikolas Engelhard, F. Endres, Wolfram Burgard, D. Cremers
{"title":"A benchmark for the evaluation of RGB-D SLAM systems","authors":"Jürgen Sturm, Nikolas Engelhard, F. Endres, Wolfram Burgard, D. Cremers","doi":"10.1109/IROS.2012.6385773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we present a novel benchmark for the evaluation of RGB-D SLAM systems. We recorded a large set of image sequences from a Microsoft Kinect with highly accurate and time-synchronized ground truth camera poses from a motion capture system. The sequences contain both the color and depth images in full sensor resolution (640 × 480) at video frame rate (30 Hz). The ground-truth trajectory was obtained from a motion-capture system with eight high-speed tracking cameras (100 Hz). The dataset consists of 39 sequences that were recorded in an office environment and an industrial hall. The dataset covers a large variety of scenes and camera motions. We provide sequences for debugging with slow motions as well as longer trajectories with and without loop closures. Most sequences were recorded from a handheld Kinect with unconstrained 6-DOF motions but we also provide sequences from a Kinect mounted on a Pioneer 3 robot that was manually navigated through a cluttered indoor environment. To stimulate the comparison of different approaches, we provide automatic evaluation tools both for the evaluation of drift of visual odometry systems and the global pose error of SLAM systems. The benchmark website [1] contains all data, detailed descriptions of the scenes, specifications of the data formats, sample code, and evaluation tools.","PeriodicalId":6358,"journal":{"name":"2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2877","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2012.6385773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2877

Abstract

In this paper, we present a novel benchmark for the evaluation of RGB-D SLAM systems. We recorded a large set of image sequences from a Microsoft Kinect with highly accurate and time-synchronized ground truth camera poses from a motion capture system. The sequences contain both the color and depth images in full sensor resolution (640 × 480) at video frame rate (30 Hz). The ground-truth trajectory was obtained from a motion-capture system with eight high-speed tracking cameras (100 Hz). The dataset consists of 39 sequences that were recorded in an office environment and an industrial hall. The dataset covers a large variety of scenes and camera motions. We provide sequences for debugging with slow motions as well as longer trajectories with and without loop closures. Most sequences were recorded from a handheld Kinect with unconstrained 6-DOF motions but we also provide sequences from a Kinect mounted on a Pioneer 3 robot that was manually navigated through a cluttered indoor environment. To stimulate the comparison of different approaches, we provide automatic evaluation tools both for the evaluation of drift of visual odometry systems and the global pose error of SLAM systems. The benchmark website [1] contains all data, detailed descriptions of the scenes, specifications of the data formats, sample code, and evaluation tools.
评估RGB-D SLAM系统的基准
在本文中,我们提出了一种新的RGB-D SLAM系统评估基准。我们记录了大量来自微软Kinect的图像序列,其中包含来自动作捕捉系统的高度精确和时间同步的地面真实相机姿势。该序列包含全传感器分辨率(640 × 480)的颜色和深度图像,视频帧率(30 Hz)。地面真实轨迹由一个带有8台高速跟踪摄像机(100hz)的动作捕捉系统获得。该数据集由在办公环境和工业大厅中记录的39个序列组成。该数据集涵盖了各种场景和摄像机运动。我们提供的序列调试与慢动作以及较长的轨迹有和没有循环闭包。大多数序列记录从手持Kinect无约束的6-DOF运动,但我们也提供序列从Kinect安装在先锋3机器人手动导航通过一个杂乱的室内环境。为了促进不同方法的比较,我们提供了自动评估工具,用于评估视觉里程计系统的漂移和SLAM系统的全局位姿误差。基准网站[1]包含所有数据、场景的详细描述、数据格式的规范、示例代码和评估工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信