The Use of Counseling Skills Within Evaluative Contexts

Monica L. Coleman
{"title":"The Use of Counseling Skills Within Evaluative Contexts","authors":"Monica L. Coleman","doi":"10.1080/21501378.2022.2025771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The use of non-therapeutic counseling skills within evaluative contexts can be of great utility, particularly when lack of trust can lead to challenges in design, data collection, analysis, and contextualization. Because counselors and program evaluators share commonalities in their competencies, counselors can leverage their mastery of interpersonal skills to facilitate a depth of connection and understanding among stakeholders that supports evaluation validity. This article describes how counselors’ training and experiences focused on using empathic communication, becoming aware of and accounting for bias, broaching differences in identities and sensitive conversations with clients, and connecting with clients using basic attending skills can ground evaluation activities in ways that promote representation of experiences and utility of findings.","PeriodicalId":37884,"journal":{"name":"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation","volume":"4 1","pages":"22 - 29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21501378.2022.2025771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract The use of non-therapeutic counseling skills within evaluative contexts can be of great utility, particularly when lack of trust can lead to challenges in design, data collection, analysis, and contextualization. Because counselors and program evaluators share commonalities in their competencies, counselors can leverage their mastery of interpersonal skills to facilitate a depth of connection and understanding among stakeholders that supports evaluation validity. This article describes how counselors’ training and experiences focused on using empathic communication, becoming aware of and accounting for bias, broaching differences in identities and sensitive conversations with clients, and connecting with clients using basic attending skills can ground evaluation activities in ways that promote representation of experiences and utility of findings.
在评估环境中使用咨询技巧
在评估环境中使用非治疗性的咨询技巧可能是非常有用的,特别是当缺乏信任会导致设计、数据收集、分析和情境化方面的挑战时。因为咨询师和项目评估员在他们的能力上有共同点,咨询师可以利用他们对人际关系技巧的掌握来促进利益相关者之间的联系和理解的深度,从而支持评估的有效性。本文描述了辅导员的培训和经验如何集中在使用移情沟通,意识到并考虑偏见,提出身份差异和与客户的敏感对话,以及使用基本的出席技能与客户建立联系,从而以促进经验的表现和结果的实用性的方式进行评估活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation
Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation (CORE) provides counselor educators, researchers, educators, and other mental health practitioners with outcome research and program evaluation practices for work with individuals across the lifespan. It addresses topics such as: treatment efficacy, clinical diagnosis, program evaluation, research design, outcome measure reviews. This journal also serves to address ethical, legal, and cultural concerns in the assessment of dependent variables, implementation of clinical interventions, and outcome research. Manuscripts typically fall into one of the following categories: Counseling Outcome Research: Treatment efficacy and effectiveness of mental health, school, addictions, rehabilitation, family, and college counseling interventions across the lifespan as reported in clinical trials, single-case research designs, single-group designs, and multi- or mixed-method designs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信