Where is Occupational Medicine Going?

{"title":"Where is Occupational Medicine Going?","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/jnh/03/02/00006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Occupational medicine, Occupational and Environmental medicine, Industrial Hygiene, Occupational and Sports\nmedicine, Protection at Work, whatever it is called in different countries, this is an extraordinary important branch\nof preventive medicine. In some European countries, occupational medicine as a scientific study lost its recognition,\nstarting from health centres to medical schools. The question to be asked is whether such an automatic negation of\na new danger is positive, not only for the reason of the lost dignity, but also because of endangering community and\nenvironment. For a long while now we witness the results of low rating and significance of the occupational medicine.\nThe traffic accidents and misuse of firearms have increased, as well as sudden deaths of young athletes at sports events,\nthe number of work injuries and professional illnesses. Further question is the growing privatization and tendency\nof the total privatization of primary and specific healthcare, i.e. the whole health system except partially hospitals.\nThe occupational medicine specialist at the open market losses the much needed neutrality and in order to keep the\nclients and survive, panders to contracted firms or to the workers. Furthermore, psychologists and psychiatrists that\nmake a compulsory part of the occupational medicine teams, do inadequate work capacity assessments by overlooking\nspecificity of the workplace. It is necessary to return dignity and independency to occupational medicine, so that\nit can achieve its primary task – assessment of work capacity, without any type of pressure. Trends of the modern\noccupational health services, visiting of work places, questioning and screenings have to be conducted but at the\nstrong stationary Occupational medicine centres, preferably at scientific educational institutions.","PeriodicalId":89422,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing and healthcare of chronic illness","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nursing and healthcare of chronic illness","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/jnh/03/02/00006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Occupational medicine, Occupational and Environmental medicine, Industrial Hygiene, Occupational and Sports medicine, Protection at Work, whatever it is called in different countries, this is an extraordinary important branch of preventive medicine. In some European countries, occupational medicine as a scientific study lost its recognition, starting from health centres to medical schools. The question to be asked is whether such an automatic negation of a new danger is positive, not only for the reason of the lost dignity, but also because of endangering community and environment. For a long while now we witness the results of low rating and significance of the occupational medicine. The traffic accidents and misuse of firearms have increased, as well as sudden deaths of young athletes at sports events, the number of work injuries and professional illnesses. Further question is the growing privatization and tendency of the total privatization of primary and specific healthcare, i.e. the whole health system except partially hospitals. The occupational medicine specialist at the open market losses the much needed neutrality and in order to keep the clients and survive, panders to contracted firms or to the workers. Furthermore, psychologists and psychiatrists that make a compulsory part of the occupational medicine teams, do inadequate work capacity assessments by overlooking specificity of the workplace. It is necessary to return dignity and independency to occupational medicine, so that it can achieve its primary task – assessment of work capacity, without any type of pressure. Trends of the modern occupational health services, visiting of work places, questioning and screenings have to be conducted but at the strong stationary Occupational medicine centres, preferably at scientific educational institutions.
职业医学何去何从?
职业医学,职业与环境医学,工业卫生,职业与运动医学,工作保护,不管在不同的国家叫什么,这是预防医学的一个非常重要的分支。在一些欧洲国家,从保健中心到医学院,职业医学作为一门科学研究失去了承认。要问的问题是,这种对新危险的自动否定是否积极,不仅因为失去了尊严,而且因为危及社区和环境。长期以来,我们目睹了职业医学的低评价和低意义的结果。交通事故和枪支滥用有所增加,年轻运动员在体育比赛中突然死亡、工伤和职业疾病的数量也有所增加。进一步的问题是日益增长的私有化和初级和特定医疗保健的全面私有化的趋势,即整个卫生系统,除了部分医院。职业医学专家在公开市场失去了急需的中立性,为了保持客户和生存,迎合合同公司或工人。此外,作为职业医疗团队的强制性组成部分的心理学家和精神科医生,由于忽视了工作场所的特殊性,对工作能力的评估不足。有必要恢复职业医学的尊严和独立性,使其能够在没有任何压力的情况下完成其主要任务-评估工作能力。现代职业健康服务的趋势、对工作场所的访问、询问和检查必须在强大的固定职业医学中心进行,最好是在科学教育机构进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信