Mosquitoes and their Control

M. Service
{"title":"Mosquitoes and their Control","authors":"M. Service","doi":"10.1179/136485910X12851868780306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"So how does this new edition of Mosquitoes and their Control differ from the first, which was published 7 years ago and also reviewed in the Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology (98, 429)? There is a new coauthor (Minoo Madon) and there are now colour photographs, more line-drawings and tables, and a considerable reorganization and expansion of Part IV, on control. The most significant change — the inclusion of brief taxonomic keys for the identification of non-European mosquitoes — was apparently made in response to criticism that, as a title for the first edition, Mosquitoes and their Control was misleading because the book only covered European mosquitoes. I understand that, after considerable discussion, the authors opted to create new chapters and present taxonomic keys to the adult females of selected species from Africa, Asia, Australia and Central, South and North America. Given the vast number of mosquito species in these areas, it is not surprising that only those that are important vectors and/or cause serious biting problems are included. I do, however, find this subjective approach rather unsatisfactory. I wonder whether the additional brief accounts of non-European mosquitoes are relevant in a book whose raison d’être is (or, at least, was) to provide more information on European mosquitoes. The largest section (41%) of the book is still devoted to the identification, morphology, biology, medical importance and distribution of European mosquitoes, and I think it would have been better if the title had simply been changed to European Mosquitoes and their Control. There is a list of known mosquito species in Europe (pages xix–xxi) but even more useful is the list of new generic names and the years in which they were adopted (pages 6 and 7). Many familiar names disappear. Ochlerotatus japonicus, for example, is now Hulecoeteomyia japonica, and Oc. geniculatus becomes Dahliana geniculata. Not everyone likes, or even accepts, the elevation of some former subgenera. The authors use of ‘Aedes/Ochlerotatus’ for Aedes and Ochlerotatus species that were previously in the genus Aedes, and ‘Aedes albopictus [Stegomyia albopicta]’ — with the older and more widely recognised species name followed, in brackets, by the new name — I found useful. Unfortunately, some anomalies remain. ‘Ochlerotatus (Mucidus) alternans’, for example, is still used as a heading on page 357, with no explanation that this taxon has become Mucidus (Mucidus) alternans. I think this shows the difficulties that can arise, especially for non-taxonomists, when so many subgenera are upgraded to generic status. Chapter 5 of Part I gives a good account of the morphology of the adults, pupae and larvae of mosquitoes, while chapters 6–10 of Part II present very-clearly-illustrated taxonomic keys for the identification of adult females and males, pupae and fourth-instar larvae of European mosquitoes. Part IV, which deals with mosquito control, has been considerably updated. It covers nearly all aspects of control, including biological control using vertebrate and invertebrate predators, fungi and parasites. About 12 pages are devoted to Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis. Another section deals with environmental management and, understandably, there is a large section (55 pages) devoted to chemical control and the management of insecticide resistance. Other control methods that are discussed include the use of insect growth regulators and juvenile hormone analogues, genetic control Annals of Tropical Medicine & Parasitology, Vol. 104, No. 8, 687–688 (2010)","PeriodicalId":8038,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Tropical Medicine & Parasitology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Tropical Medicine & Parasitology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/136485910X12851868780306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

So how does this new edition of Mosquitoes and their Control differ from the first, which was published 7 years ago and also reviewed in the Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology (98, 429)? There is a new coauthor (Minoo Madon) and there are now colour photographs, more line-drawings and tables, and a considerable reorganization and expansion of Part IV, on control. The most significant change — the inclusion of brief taxonomic keys for the identification of non-European mosquitoes — was apparently made in response to criticism that, as a title for the first edition, Mosquitoes and their Control was misleading because the book only covered European mosquitoes. I understand that, after considerable discussion, the authors opted to create new chapters and present taxonomic keys to the adult females of selected species from Africa, Asia, Australia and Central, South and North America. Given the vast number of mosquito species in these areas, it is not surprising that only those that are important vectors and/or cause serious biting problems are included. I do, however, find this subjective approach rather unsatisfactory. I wonder whether the additional brief accounts of non-European mosquitoes are relevant in a book whose raison d’être is (or, at least, was) to provide more information on European mosquitoes. The largest section (41%) of the book is still devoted to the identification, morphology, biology, medical importance and distribution of European mosquitoes, and I think it would have been better if the title had simply been changed to European Mosquitoes and their Control. There is a list of known mosquito species in Europe (pages xix–xxi) but even more useful is the list of new generic names and the years in which they were adopted (pages 6 and 7). Many familiar names disappear. Ochlerotatus japonicus, for example, is now Hulecoeteomyia japonica, and Oc. geniculatus becomes Dahliana geniculata. Not everyone likes, or even accepts, the elevation of some former subgenera. The authors use of ‘Aedes/Ochlerotatus’ for Aedes and Ochlerotatus species that were previously in the genus Aedes, and ‘Aedes albopictus [Stegomyia albopicta]’ — with the older and more widely recognised species name followed, in brackets, by the new name — I found useful. Unfortunately, some anomalies remain. ‘Ochlerotatus (Mucidus) alternans’, for example, is still used as a heading on page 357, with no explanation that this taxon has become Mucidus (Mucidus) alternans. I think this shows the difficulties that can arise, especially for non-taxonomists, when so many subgenera are upgraded to generic status. Chapter 5 of Part I gives a good account of the morphology of the adults, pupae and larvae of mosquitoes, while chapters 6–10 of Part II present very-clearly-illustrated taxonomic keys for the identification of adult females and males, pupae and fourth-instar larvae of European mosquitoes. Part IV, which deals with mosquito control, has been considerably updated. It covers nearly all aspects of control, including biological control using vertebrate and invertebrate predators, fungi and parasites. About 12 pages are devoted to Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis. Another section deals with environmental management and, understandably, there is a large section (55 pages) devoted to chemical control and the management of insecticide resistance. Other control methods that are discussed include the use of insect growth regulators and juvenile hormone analogues, genetic control Annals of Tropical Medicine & Parasitology, Vol. 104, No. 8, 687–688 (2010)
蚊子及其防治
那么,新版《蚊子及其控制》与7年前出版的第一版《热带医学与寄生虫学年鉴》(Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, 98,429)有何不同?有了一位新的合著者(Minoo Madon),现在有了彩色照片,更多的线条图和表格,并且对第四部分进行了相当大的重组和扩展,即控制。最重要的变化——包括识别非欧洲蚊子的简短分类键——显然是为了回应批评,即作为第一版的标题,《蚊子及其控制》具有误导性,因为该书只涉及欧洲蚊子。据我所知,经过大量的讨论,作者选择创建新的章节,并提供来自非洲,亚洲,澳大利亚和中,南美和北美的精选物种的成年雌性的分类钥匙。鉴于这些地区的蚊子种类繁多,只包括那些重要的病媒和/或造成严重叮咬问题的蚊子也就不足为奇了。然而,我确实发现这种主观的方法相当令人不满意。我想知道这些关于非欧洲蚊子的简短描述是否与这本书有关,这本书之所以创建être的目的是(或者至少曾经是)提供更多关于欧洲蚊子的信息。书中最大的部分(41%)仍然是关于欧洲蚊子的鉴定、形态学、生物学、医学重要性和分布的,我认为如果把书名改成《欧洲蚊子及其控制》会更好。有一份欧洲已知蚊子种类的清单(第19 - 22页),但更有用的是新的属名及其采用年份的清单(第6和7页)。许多熟悉的名字消失了。例如,Ochlerotatus japonicus现在是Hulecoeteomyia japonica, Oc。龙葵变成龙葵。并不是每个人都喜欢甚至接受一些前亚属的提升。作者用“伊蚊/赤纹伊蚊”来表示以前属于伊蚊属的伊蚊和赤纹伊蚊,用“白纹伊蚊[白纹伊蚊]”——括号里是更古老、更广为人知的物种名称,后面是新名称——我发现这很有用。不幸的是,一些反常现象仍然存在。例如,“Ochlerotatus (Mucidus) alternans”仍然被用作357页的标题,没有解释这个分类群已经成为Mucidus (Mucidus) alternans。我认为这表明了可能出现的困难,特别是对于非分类学家来说,当如此多的亚属被升级为属时。第1部分第5章很好地描述了蚊子的成虫、蛹和幼虫的形态,第2部分第6-10章非常清楚地说明了欧洲蚊子的成年雌蚊和雄蚊、蛹和4龄幼虫的分类关键。第四部分涉及蚊虫控制,已作了相当大的更新。它涵盖了控制的几乎所有方面,包括利用脊椎动物和无脊椎动物捕食者、真菌和寄生虫进行生物控制。大约有12页是关于苏云金芽孢杆菌的。另一节涉及环境管理,可以理解的是,有一大节(55页)专门讨论化学控制和杀虫剂抗性管理。讨论的其他控制方法包括使用昆虫生长调节剂和幼虫激素类似物,遗传控制热带医学与寄生虫学年鉴,Vol. 104, No. 8, 687-688 (2010)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信