The Impact of Instructional Design on College Students' Cognitive Load and Learning Outcomes in a Large Food Science and Human Nutrition Course.

J. Andrade, W. Huang, D. Bohn
{"title":"The Impact of Instructional Design on College Students' Cognitive Load and Learning Outcomes in a Large Food Science and Human Nutrition Course.","authors":"J. Andrade, W. Huang, D. Bohn","doi":"10.1111/1541-4329.12067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effective design of course materials is critical for student learning, especially for large lecture introductory courses. This quantitative study was designed to explore the effect multimedia and content difficulty has on students’ cognitive load and learning outcomes. College students (n = 268) were randomized into 1 of 3 multimedia groups: text + graphics (Group 1–TG); audio + text + graphics (Group 2–ATG); or video + audio + text + graphics (Group 3–VATG). Participants answered a demographic survey and pretests before viewing 2 food science supplemental lecture materials (i.e., water mobility and amino acid structures) and completing the cognitive load instrument and post-tests within a noncontrolled setting. Cognitive load scores were tabulated and compared using a 3 × 3 ANOVA and Tukey post hoc analysis across multimedia groups and food science supplemental lecture materials. Based on the post hoc, students in Group 1–TG had higher intrinsic cognitive load scores than Group 2–ATG (ANOVA, P < 0.05). Cognitive load and post-test scores were tabulated and compared using a spearman correlation across groups. In Group 1–TG, students that reported less intrinsic cognitive load had higher post-test scores. Also, students that reported more germane cognitive load had higher post-test scores. In Groups 2–ATG and 3–VATG, students that reported less extraneous cognitive load had higher post-test scores (ANOVA, P < 0.05).","PeriodicalId":22784,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Food Science Education","volume":"145 1","pages":"127-135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Food Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4329.12067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The effective design of course materials is critical for student learning, especially for large lecture introductory courses. This quantitative study was designed to explore the effect multimedia and content difficulty has on students’ cognitive load and learning outcomes. College students (n = 268) were randomized into 1 of 3 multimedia groups: text + graphics (Group 1–TG); audio + text + graphics (Group 2–ATG); or video + audio + text + graphics (Group 3–VATG). Participants answered a demographic survey and pretests before viewing 2 food science supplemental lecture materials (i.e., water mobility and amino acid structures) and completing the cognitive load instrument and post-tests within a noncontrolled setting. Cognitive load scores were tabulated and compared using a 3 × 3 ANOVA and Tukey post hoc analysis across multimedia groups and food science supplemental lecture materials. Based on the post hoc, students in Group 1–TG had higher intrinsic cognitive load scores than Group 2–ATG (ANOVA, P < 0.05). Cognitive load and post-test scores were tabulated and compared using a spearman correlation across groups. In Group 1–TG, students that reported less intrinsic cognitive load had higher post-test scores. Also, students that reported more germane cognitive load had higher post-test scores. In Groups 2–ATG and 3–VATG, students that reported less extraneous cognitive load had higher post-test scores (ANOVA, P < 0.05).
大型食品科学与人体营养课程教学设计对大学生认知负荷及学习效果的影响。
课程材料的有效设计对学生的学习至关重要,特别是对于大型讲座的入门课程。本研究旨在探讨多媒体和内容难度对学生认知负荷和学习成果的影响。268名大学生随机分为3个多媒体组:文本+图形组(组1 - tg);音频+文字+图形(2-ATG组);或视频+音频+文字+图形(组3-VATG)。参与者在观看2个食品科学补充讲座材料(即水的流动性和氨基酸结构)之前回答了人口统计调查和预测试,并在非受控环境下完成了认知负荷仪器和后测试。认知负荷得分被制成表格,并使用3 × 3方差分析和Tukey事后分析对多媒体组和食品科学补充讲座材料进行比较。基于事后分析,1-TG组学生的内在认知负荷得分高于2-ATG组(方差分析,P < 0.05)。认知负荷和测试后得分被制成表格,并使用spearman相关性对各组进行比较。在第1-TG组中,报告内在认知负荷较少的学生在测试后得分较高。此外,报告认知负荷更相关的学生在测试后得分更高。在2-ATG组和3-VATG组中,外源认知负荷较少的学生测试后得分较高(方差分析,P < 0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信