Moving Beyond the Characterization of Activity Intensity Bouts as Square Waves Signals

M. O'Brien, Jennifer L. Petterson, Liam P. Pellerine, Madeline E. Shivgulam, D. Kimmerly, Ryan J. Frayne, P. Hettiarachchi, Peter J. Johansson
{"title":"Moving Beyond the Characterization of Activity Intensity Bouts as Square Waves Signals","authors":"M. O'Brien, Jennifer L. Petterson, Liam P. Pellerine, Madeline E. Shivgulam, D. Kimmerly, Ryan J. Frayne, P. Hettiarachchi, Peter J. Johansson","doi":"10.1123/jmpb.2022-0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wearable activity monitors provide objective estimates of time in different physical activity intensities. Each continuous stepping period is described by its length and a corresponding single intensity (in metabolic equivalents of task [METs]), creating square wave–shaped signals. We argue that physiological responses do not resemble square waves, with the purpose of this technical report to challenge this idea and use experimental data as a proof of concept and direct potential solutions to better characterize activity intensity. Healthy adults (n = 43, 19♀; 23 ± 5 years) completed 6-min treadmill stages (five walking and five jogging/running) where oxygen consumption (3.5 ml O2·kg−1·min−1 = 1 MET) was recorded throughout and following the cessation of stepping. The time to steady state was ∼1–1.5 min, and time back to baseline following exercise was ∼1–2 min, with faster stepping stages generally exhibiting longer durations. Instead of square waves, the duration intensity signal reflected a trapezoid shape for each stage. The METs per minute during the rise to steady state (upstroke slopes; average: 1.7–6.3 METs/min for slow walking to running) may be used to better characterize activity intensity for shorter activity bouts where steady state is not achieved (within ∼90 s). While treating each activity bout as a single intensity is a much simpler analytical procedure, characterizing each bout in a continuous manner may better reflect the true physiological responses to movement. The information provided herein may be used to improve the characterization of activity intensity, definition of bout breaks, and act as a starting point for researchers and software developers interested in using wearables to measure activity intensity.","PeriodicalId":73572,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the measurement of physical behaviour","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for the measurement of physical behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jmpb.2022-0041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wearable activity monitors provide objective estimates of time in different physical activity intensities. Each continuous stepping period is described by its length and a corresponding single intensity (in metabolic equivalents of task [METs]), creating square wave–shaped signals. We argue that physiological responses do not resemble square waves, with the purpose of this technical report to challenge this idea and use experimental data as a proof of concept and direct potential solutions to better characterize activity intensity. Healthy adults (n = 43, 19♀; 23 ± 5 years) completed 6-min treadmill stages (five walking and five jogging/running) where oxygen consumption (3.5 ml O2·kg−1·min−1 = 1 MET) was recorded throughout and following the cessation of stepping. The time to steady state was ∼1–1.5 min, and time back to baseline following exercise was ∼1–2 min, with faster stepping stages generally exhibiting longer durations. Instead of square waves, the duration intensity signal reflected a trapezoid shape for each stage. The METs per minute during the rise to steady state (upstroke slopes; average: 1.7–6.3 METs/min for slow walking to running) may be used to better characterize activity intensity for shorter activity bouts where steady state is not achieved (within ∼90 s). While treating each activity bout as a single intensity is a much simpler analytical procedure, characterizing each bout in a continuous manner may better reflect the true physiological responses to movement. The information provided herein may be used to improve the characterization of activity intensity, definition of bout breaks, and act as a starting point for researchers and software developers interested in using wearables to measure activity intensity.
超越活动强度回合作为方波信号的表征
可穿戴式活动监测器在不同的身体活动强度下提供客观的时间估计。每个连续的步进周期由其长度和相应的单个强度(在任务的代谢当量[METs]中)来描述,形成方波状信号。我们认为生理反应不像方波,本技术报告的目的是挑战这一观点,并使用实验数据作为概念的证明和直接潜在的解决方案,以更好地表征活动强度。健康成人(n = 43, 19♀;23±5年)完成6分钟的跑步机阶段(5次步行和5次慢跑/跑步),在整个过程中和停止行走后记录耗氧量(3.5 ml O2·kg−1·min−1 = 1 MET)。达到稳定状态的时间为~ 1-1.5分钟,运动后回到基线的时间为~ 1-2分钟,越快的踏步阶段通常持续时间越长。而不是方波,持续时间强度信号反映了梯形形状的每一个阶段。上升到稳定状态时的每分钟代谢当量(上冲程斜率;平均:1.7-6.3 METs/min(慢走到跑步)可用于更好地表征未达到稳定状态(在~ 90秒内)的较短活动回合的活动强度。虽然将每次活动回合视为单一强度是一种更简单的分析过程,但以连续的方式表征每次活动回合可能更好地反映对运动的真实生理反应。本文提供的信息可用于改进活动强度的表征,间歇的定义,并作为对使用可穿戴设备测量活动强度感兴趣的研究人员和软件开发人员的起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信