Palatability of Beef Strip Loin Steaks Representing Various Marbling and Maturity Levels from Grain-Fed Beef

David Andrew Cashman, Hope R. Hall, A. Garmyn, T. O’Quinn, J. Brooks, M. Miller
{"title":"Palatability of Beef Strip Loin Steaks Representing Various Marbling and Maturity Levels from Grain-Fed Beef","authors":"David Andrew Cashman, Hope R. Hall, A. Garmyn, T. O’Quinn, J. Brooks, M. Miller","doi":"10.22175/MMB2019.03.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study compared palatability traits of beef strip loin steaks with varying marbling scores from young and mature grain-fed beef. Strip loins (n = 150) were selected from grain fed cattle representing ten treatments with the following USDA marbling scores: Slightly Abundant or greater (SLAB+), Moderate or Modest (MD/MT), Small (SM), Slight (SL), and Traces or Practically Devoid (TR/PD) from young “A” maturity carcasses (Y) and mature “C” or greater maturity carcasses (M). Subprimals were fabricated into 2.5-cm steaks at 21 d postmortem and stored frozen until further analysis. Consumer (n = 120) sensory panelists evaluated cooked steaks for tenderness, juiciness, flavor liking, and overall liking. Trained panelists (n = 15 sessions) evaluated each sample for initial and sustained juiciness, initial and sustained tenderness, flavor intensity, and off-flavor intensity. For all traits, consumer and trained panelists’ scores generally decreased with decreasing marbling score, regardless of maturity. According to consumers, maturity had no effect on juiciness or flavor liking within each marbling score, except flavor liking of SLAB+ was greater (P < 0.05) for young than mature carcasses. Conversely, young carcasses had greater tenderness scores than mature within all marbling categories except SM, which translated to greater overall liking of MD/MT, SL, and TR/PD of young compared to their mature counterparts (P < 0.05). Trained panelists detected very few differences between young and mature samples within their respective marbling score; however, M-MD/MT had lower initial and sustained tenderness coupled with greater off-flavor intensity than Y-MD/MT (P < 0.05). Mature samples with SLAB+ and MD/MT marbling were rated greater than or equal to Y-SM for all traits, indicating the presence of marbling from feeding a grain diet prior to harvest may elicit a similar eating experience to young beef by offsetting negative palatability traits often associated with mature beef.","PeriodicalId":18316,"journal":{"name":"Meat and Muscle Biology","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meat and Muscle Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22175/MMB2019.03.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study compared palatability traits of beef strip loin steaks with varying marbling scores from young and mature grain-fed beef. Strip loins (n = 150) were selected from grain fed cattle representing ten treatments with the following USDA marbling scores: Slightly Abundant or greater (SLAB+), Moderate or Modest (MD/MT), Small (SM), Slight (SL), and Traces or Practically Devoid (TR/PD) from young “A” maturity carcasses (Y) and mature “C” or greater maturity carcasses (M). Subprimals were fabricated into 2.5-cm steaks at 21 d postmortem and stored frozen until further analysis. Consumer (n = 120) sensory panelists evaluated cooked steaks for tenderness, juiciness, flavor liking, and overall liking. Trained panelists (n = 15 sessions) evaluated each sample for initial and sustained juiciness, initial and sustained tenderness, flavor intensity, and off-flavor intensity. For all traits, consumer and trained panelists’ scores generally decreased with decreasing marbling score, regardless of maturity. According to consumers, maturity had no effect on juiciness or flavor liking within each marbling score, except flavor liking of SLAB+ was greater (P < 0.05) for young than mature carcasses. Conversely, young carcasses had greater tenderness scores than mature within all marbling categories except SM, which translated to greater overall liking of MD/MT, SL, and TR/PD of young compared to their mature counterparts (P < 0.05). Trained panelists detected very few differences between young and mature samples within their respective marbling score; however, M-MD/MT had lower initial and sustained tenderness coupled with greater off-flavor intensity than Y-MD/MT (P < 0.05). Mature samples with SLAB+ and MD/MT marbling were rated greater than or equal to Y-SM for all traits, indicating the presence of marbling from feeding a grain diet prior to harvest may elicit a similar eating experience to young beef by offsetting negative palatability traits often associated with mature beef.
代表不同大理石纹和成熟程度的谷物饲养牛肉的牛里脊牛排的适口性
本研究比较了不同大理石纹评分的幼龄和成熟谷饲牛肉里脊牛排的适口性状。从美国农业部大理石纹评分为以下10种处理方式的谷物饲养牛中选择条状腰部(n = 150):略丰富或更多(SLAB+),中等或适度(MD/MT),小(SM),轻微(SL)和痕迹或几乎缺乏(TR/PD),来自年轻的“A”成熟胴体(Y)和成熟的“C”或更成熟的胴体(M)。亚动物在死后21天制成2.5厘米的牛排并冷冻保存,等待进一步分析。消费者(n = 120)感官小组成员评估熟牛排的嫩度、多汁性、风味喜好和整体喜好。训练有素的小组成员(n = 15次会议)评估每个样品的初始和持续多汁性,初始和持续嫩度,风味强度和异味强度。对于所有的特征,消费者和受过训练的小组成员的得分通常随着大理石纹得分的降低而降低,无论成熟度如何。消费者反映,成熟度对各大理石纹评分内肉质的多汁性和风味均无影响,但幼肉的SLAB+风味高于成熟肉(P < 0.05)。相反,在所有大理石纹类别中,幼体的嫩度评分都高于成熟体,除了SM,这意味着幼体对MD/MT、SL和TR/PD的总体喜爱程度高于成熟体(P < 0.05)。训练有素的小组成员在各自的大理石纹评分中发现年轻和成熟样本之间的差异很小;与Y-MD/MT相比,M-MD/MT的初始嫩度和持续嫩度较低,且异味强度较大(P < 0.05)。具有SLAB+和MD/MT大理石纹的成熟样品的所有性状都大于或等于Y-SM,这表明在收获前喂养谷物饮食中存在的大理石纹可能会抵消通常与成熟牛肉相关的负面适口性状,从而引起与年轻牛肉相似的食用体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信