The Discussion of Ziben zhuyi (capitalism) in China’s Debate on Socialism (1920-1921)

Longhu Cao
{"title":"The Discussion of Ziben zhuyi (capitalism) in China’s Debate on Socialism (1920-1921)","authors":"Longhu Cao","doi":"10.3726/cul022020.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: The spread of “capitalism” from West to East not only brought knowledge of an economic model but also offered nations a new path for development. This expansion was met by the rise of the socialist revolutionary movement, which aimed to overthrow the\n capitalist political and economic system. This article examines the concept of “capitalism” in the context of the debate on socialism. By studying the elaborations of Ziben zhuyi (capitalism) by its proponents and opponents, as well as the debate-related expressions proposed\n by later scholars in different contexts, this study reflects on the politicization of “capitalism”, the complexity of its meaning, and the degree of political ideology in its implementation. Based on the analysis of relevant papers on the debate, it concludes that (1) as a highly\n politicized concept, “capitalism” reflects intellectuals’ assumptions regarding China’s future and the evolution of its political ideologies; (2) “capitalism” has a complicated conceptual connotation, and it is necessary to consider its many aspects to present\n the full picture of what people think about it; and (3) the degree of capitalist ideology varies in different periods and contexts.","PeriodicalId":92192,"journal":{"name":"Cultura (Iasi, Romania)","volume":"205 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultura (Iasi, Romania)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3726/cul022020.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: The spread of “capitalism” from West to East not only brought knowledge of an economic model but also offered nations a new path for development. This expansion was met by the rise of the socialist revolutionary movement, which aimed to overthrow the capitalist political and economic system. This article examines the concept of “capitalism” in the context of the debate on socialism. By studying the elaborations of Ziben zhuyi (capitalism) by its proponents and opponents, as well as the debate-related expressions proposed by later scholars in different contexts, this study reflects on the politicization of “capitalism”, the complexity of its meaning, and the degree of political ideology in its implementation. Based on the analysis of relevant papers on the debate, it concludes that (1) as a highly politicized concept, “capitalism” reflects intellectuals’ assumptions regarding China’s future and the evolution of its political ideologies; (2) “capitalism” has a complicated conceptual connotation, and it is necessary to consider its many aspects to present the full picture of what people think about it; and (3) the degree of capitalist ideology varies in different periods and contexts.
中国社会主义论争中的资本主义论(1920-1921)
摘要:“资本主义”从西方传播到东方,不仅带来了一种经济模式的知识,而且为各国提供了一条新的发展道路。这种扩张遇到了旨在推翻资本主义政治和经济制度的社会主义革命运动的兴起。本文在社会主义争论的背景下考察“资本主义”的概念。本研究通过研究资本主义的支持者和反对者对资本主义的阐述,以及后来的学者在不同语境下提出的与争论相关的表述,来反思“资本主义”的政治化、其含义的复杂性以及其实施过程中的政治意识形态程度。通过对相关文献的分析,本文得出结论:(1)“资本主义”作为一个高度政治化的概念,反映了知识分子对中国未来及其政治意识形态演变的设想;(2)“资本主义”具有复杂的概念内涵,要全面反映人们对资本主义的看法,必须从多方面加以考虑;(3)资本主义意识形态的程度在不同时期和背景下有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书