How Well Do We Understand the Land-Ocean-Atmosphere Carbon Cycle?

IF 25.2 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
David Crisp, Han Dolman, Toste Tanhua, Galen A. McKinley, Judith Hauck, Ana Bastos, Stephen Sitch, Simon Eggleston, Valentin Aich
{"title":"How Well Do We Understand the Land-Ocean-Atmosphere Carbon Cycle?","authors":"David Crisp,&nbsp;Han Dolman,&nbsp;Toste Tanhua,&nbsp;Galen A. McKinley,&nbsp;Judith Hauck,&nbsp;Ana Bastos,&nbsp;Stephen Sitch,&nbsp;Simon Eggleston,&nbsp;Valentin Aich","doi":"10.1029/2021RG000736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Fossil fuel combustion, land use change and other human activities have increased the atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) abundance by about 50% since the beginning of the industrial age. The atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> growth rates would have been much larger if natural sinks in the land biosphere and ocean had not removed over half of this anthropogenic CO<sub>2</sub>. As these CO<sub>2</sub> emissions grew, uptake by the ocean increased in response to increases in atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure (pCO<sub>2</sub>). On land, gross primary production also increased, but the dynamics of other key aspects of the land carbon cycle varied regionally. Over the past three decades, CO<sub>2</sub> uptake by intact tropical humid forests declined, but these changes are offset by increased uptake across mid- and high-latitudes. While there have been substantial improvements in our ability to study the carbon cycle, measurement and modeling gaps still limit our understanding of the processes driving its evolution. Continued ship-based observations combined with expanded deployments of autonomous platforms are needed to quantify ocean-atmosphere fluxes and interior ocean carbon storage on policy-relevant spatial and temporal scales. There is also an urgent need for more comprehensive measurements of stocks, fluxes and atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> in humid tropical forests and across the Arctic and boreal regions, which are experiencing rapid change. Here, we review our understanding of the atmosphere, ocean, and land carbon cycles and their interactions, identify emerging measurement and modeling capabilities and gaps and the need for a sustainable, operational framework to ensure a scientific basis for carbon management.</p>","PeriodicalId":21177,"journal":{"name":"Reviews of Geophysics","volume":"60 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":25.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2021RG000736","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews of Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2021RG000736","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

Abstract

Fossil fuel combustion, land use change and other human activities have increased the atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) abundance by about 50% since the beginning of the industrial age. The atmospheric CO2 growth rates would have been much larger if natural sinks in the land biosphere and ocean had not removed over half of this anthropogenic CO2. As these CO2 emissions grew, uptake by the ocean increased in response to increases in atmospheric CO2 partial pressure (pCO2). On land, gross primary production also increased, but the dynamics of other key aspects of the land carbon cycle varied regionally. Over the past three decades, CO2 uptake by intact tropical humid forests declined, but these changes are offset by increased uptake across mid- and high-latitudes. While there have been substantial improvements in our ability to study the carbon cycle, measurement and modeling gaps still limit our understanding of the processes driving its evolution. Continued ship-based observations combined with expanded deployments of autonomous platforms are needed to quantify ocean-atmosphere fluxes and interior ocean carbon storage on policy-relevant spatial and temporal scales. There is also an urgent need for more comprehensive measurements of stocks, fluxes and atmospheric CO2 in humid tropical forests and across the Arctic and boreal regions, which are experiencing rapid change. Here, we review our understanding of the atmosphere, ocean, and land carbon cycles and their interactions, identify emerging measurement and modeling capabilities and gaps and the need for a sustainable, operational framework to ensure a scientific basis for carbon management.

Abstract Image

我们对陆地-海洋-大气碳循环的了解有多深?
自工业时代开始以来,化石燃料燃烧、土地利用变化和其他人类活动使大气中的二氧化碳(CO2)丰度增加了约50%。如果陆地生物圈和海洋中的自然汇没有消除一半以上的人为二氧化碳,大气中的二氧化碳增长率将会大得多。随着这些二氧化碳排放量的增加,海洋的吸收量也随着大气二氧化碳分压(pCO2)的增加而增加。在土地上,初级生产总值也有所增加,但土地碳循环其他关键方面的动态因区域而异。在过去三十年中,完整的热带潮湿森林的二氧化碳吸收量下降,但这些变化被中高纬度地区吸收量的增加所抵消。虽然我们研究碳循环的能力有了实质性的提高,但测量和建模的差距仍然限制了我们对推动其演变的过程的理解。要在与政策相关的时空尺度上量化海洋-大气通量和海洋内部碳储量,需要持续的船舶观测与自主平台的扩大部署相结合。还迫切需要更全面地测量潮湿的热带森林以及整个北极和北方地区的二氧化碳储量、通量和大气中的二氧化碳,这些地区正在经历迅速的变化。在这里,我们回顾了我们对大气、海洋和陆地碳循环及其相互作用的认识,确定了新兴的测量和建模能力和差距,以及需要一个可持续的、可操作的框架,以确保碳管理的科学基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reviews of Geophysics
Reviews of Geophysics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
50.30
自引率
0.80%
发文量
28
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Geophysics Reviews (ROG) offers comprehensive overviews and syntheses of current research across various domains of the Earth and space sciences. Our goal is to present accessible and engaging reviews that cater to the diverse AGU community. While authorship is typically by invitation, we warmly encourage readers and potential authors to share their suggestions with our editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信