Self Study as Timely and Timeless

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
J. Kitchen, A. Berry
{"title":"Self Study as Timely and Timeless","authors":"J. Kitchen, A. Berry","doi":"10.1080/17425964.2021.1903217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Self-study practitioners critically and reflectively examine themselves, their practice and the contexts in which they work. Quality self-studies, such as the six articles in this issue of Studying Teacher Education, are situated in the present moment yet engage perennial questions in teaching and teacher education. The ‘self’ figures prominently in the Self-Study of Teacher Education Practices. Most studies implicitly or explicitly explore practitioner identity, voice and/or agency. While the treatment of self may be timeless in S-STEP, it may be time to revisit our conceptions of self. Oren Ergas was an outsider to ‘self-study’ when he stumbled upon the S-STEP Special Interest Group at the American Educational Research Association conference in 2018. Oren’s questioning was welcomed by S-STEP stalwart Jason K. Ritter. Together, Ergas and Ritter (2020) embarked on a journey to examine the self in teacher education that has resulted in an edited volume, Exploring Self toward Expanding Teaching, Teacher Education and Practitioner Research, that features chapters by notable voices in self-study. ‘Expanding the Place of Self in Self-Study through an Autoethnography of Discontents,’ their article in this issue, is a timely reconsideration of the self in self-study in the form of an autoethnography of Oren and his discontents. They conclude by considering the implications of their scholarly examination of the treatment of self in self-study by identifying implications for ontology, epistemology, ethical commitments, and methodology and authority of self. While there is much that is fresh in this article, Oren and Jason situate their ideas as ‘accentuations’ of claims made in seminal works in self-study, notably Bullough and Pinnegar (2004) on ontology of self in self-study and by LaBoskey (2004) on practices of self-reflection and self-transformation. Nothing could be more timely than an article on Covid-19. ‘Self-study,’ as Berry and Kitchen (2020) wrote in the editorial for issue 16(2) of this journal, ‘has important contributions to make in these times for documenting the experiences and insights that come from radical educational change’ (p. 123). We posed three questions:","PeriodicalId":45793,"journal":{"name":"Studying Teacher Education","volume":"183 1","pages":"1 - 3"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studying Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2021.1903217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Self-study practitioners critically and reflectively examine themselves, their practice and the contexts in which they work. Quality self-studies, such as the six articles in this issue of Studying Teacher Education, are situated in the present moment yet engage perennial questions in teaching and teacher education. The ‘self’ figures prominently in the Self-Study of Teacher Education Practices. Most studies implicitly or explicitly explore practitioner identity, voice and/or agency. While the treatment of self may be timeless in S-STEP, it may be time to revisit our conceptions of self. Oren Ergas was an outsider to ‘self-study’ when he stumbled upon the S-STEP Special Interest Group at the American Educational Research Association conference in 2018. Oren’s questioning was welcomed by S-STEP stalwart Jason K. Ritter. Together, Ergas and Ritter (2020) embarked on a journey to examine the self in teacher education that has resulted in an edited volume, Exploring Self toward Expanding Teaching, Teacher Education and Practitioner Research, that features chapters by notable voices in self-study. ‘Expanding the Place of Self in Self-Study through an Autoethnography of Discontents,’ their article in this issue, is a timely reconsideration of the self in self-study in the form of an autoethnography of Oren and his discontents. They conclude by considering the implications of their scholarly examination of the treatment of self in self-study by identifying implications for ontology, epistemology, ethical commitments, and methodology and authority of self. While there is much that is fresh in this article, Oren and Jason situate their ideas as ‘accentuations’ of claims made in seminal works in self-study, notably Bullough and Pinnegar (2004) on ontology of self in self-study and by LaBoskey (2004) on practices of self-reflection and self-transformation. Nothing could be more timely than an article on Covid-19. ‘Self-study,’ as Berry and Kitchen (2020) wrote in the editorial for issue 16(2) of this journal, ‘has important contributions to make in these times for documenting the experiences and insights that come from radical educational change’ (p. 123). We posed three questions:
适时和永恒的自学
自学从业者批判性和反思性地审视自己,他们的实践和他们工作的环境。高质量的自学,如本期《教师教育研究》的六篇文章,虽然处于当下,但却涉及教学和教师教育的长期问题。“自我”在教师教育实践自我研究中占有突出地位。大多数研究都或隐或明地探讨从业者的身份、声音和/或代理。虽然在S-STEP中对自我的处理可能是永恒的,但也许是时候重新审视我们对自我的概念了。2018年,奥伦·厄加斯在美国教育研究协会的会议上偶然发现了S-STEP特殊兴趣小组,当时他是一个“自学”的局外人。奥伦的提问受到了S-STEP忠实拥护者杰森·k·里特的欢迎。厄加斯和里特尔(2020)共同踏上了一段探索教师教育中的自我的旅程,这一旅程产生了一本编辑过的书,《探索自我走向扩展教学、教师教育和实践者研究》,其中以自学中的著名声音为特色。"通过不满者的自我民族志扩展自我在自我学习中的地位"他们在本期的文章,及时地以奥伦和他的不满者的自我民族志的形式重新思考了自我在自我学习中的地位。最后,他们通过确定本体论、认识论、伦理承诺、方法论和自我权威的含义,考虑了他们对自我学习中自我处理的学术检查的含义。虽然这篇文章中有很多新鲜的东西,但Oren和Jason将他们的观点定位为“强调”自我学习开创性著作中的主张,特别是布洛和平尼加尔(2004)关于自我学习中的自我本体论和拉博斯基(2004)关于自我反思和自我转化的实践。没有什么比一篇关于Covid-19的文章更及时了。Berry和Kitchen(2020)在本刊第16期(2)的社论中写道,“自学”在记录激进教育变革带来的经验和见解方面做出了重要贡献(第123页)。我们提出了三个问题:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studying Teacher Education
Studying Teacher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
43.80%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Studying Teacher Education invites submissions from authors who have a strong interest in improving the quality of teaching generally and of teacher education in particular. The central purpose of the journal is to disseminate high-quality research and dialogue in self-study of teacher education practices. Thus the journal is primarily a forum for teacher educators who work in contexts and programs of teacher education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信