Assessment of activation, intensity and duration of positive and negative emotions: psychometric properties of the Polish version of the Perth Emtional Reactivity Scale - Short Form.

IF 1 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Current Issues in Personality Psychology Pub Date : 2022-12-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5114/cipp/156146
Paweł Larionow, Karolina Mudło-Głagolska
{"title":"Assessment of activation, intensity and duration of positive and negative emotions: psychometric properties of the Polish version of the Perth Emtional Reactivity Scale - Short Form.","authors":"Paweł Larionow, Karolina Mudło-Głagolska","doi":"10.5114/cipp/156146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Perth Emotional Reactivity Scale - Short Form (PERS-S) is an 18-item self-report questionnaire that assesses emotional reactivity. The PERS-S measures activation, intensity, and duration of negative and positive emotions. The study aims to validate the Polish version of the PERS-S.</p><p><strong>Participants and procedure: </strong>The study was performed on a sample of 675 people aged 18-80 (<i>M</i> = 28.88, <i>SD</i> = 13.17, 56.15% female). The factor structure and measurement invariance across gender, age and educational categories were verified with confirmatory factor analysis. Convergent and divergent validity were assessed based on the relationship between the PERS-S scale and the Emotional Reactivity scale taken from the Formal Characteristics of Behaviour-Temperament Inventory, the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, the Perceived Stress Scale, the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale and the Subjective Vitality Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intended 6-factor model was an excellent fit for the data (CFI = .963; TLI = .953; RMSEA = .053, 90% CI [.046; .061]; SRMR = .057) and was invariant across gender, educational level and age groups. All PERS-S subscales correlated with another emotional reactivity questionnaire, stress, emotion regulation strategies, well-being and vitality as expected. The reliability was high for all subscales (α > .70); it was slightly lower only for the positive-activation subscale (α = .68). Due to gender differences in emotional reactivity traits, group norms (sten scale) were calculated separately for females and males.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Polish version of the PERS-S has strong psychometric properties. Its practical applications are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":43067,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues in Personality Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11094455/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues in Personality Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp/156146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Perth Emotional Reactivity Scale - Short Form (PERS-S) is an 18-item self-report questionnaire that assesses emotional reactivity. The PERS-S measures activation, intensity, and duration of negative and positive emotions. The study aims to validate the Polish version of the PERS-S.

Participants and procedure: The study was performed on a sample of 675 people aged 18-80 (M = 28.88, SD = 13.17, 56.15% female). The factor structure and measurement invariance across gender, age and educational categories were verified with confirmatory factor analysis. Convergent and divergent validity were assessed based on the relationship between the PERS-S scale and the Emotional Reactivity scale taken from the Formal Characteristics of Behaviour-Temperament Inventory, the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, the Perceived Stress Scale, the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale and the Subjective Vitality Scale.

Results: The intended 6-factor model was an excellent fit for the data (CFI = .963; TLI = .953; RMSEA = .053, 90% CI [.046; .061]; SRMR = .057) and was invariant across gender, educational level and age groups. All PERS-S subscales correlated with another emotional reactivity questionnaire, stress, emotion regulation strategies, well-being and vitality as expected. The reliability was high for all subscales (α > .70); it was slightly lower only for the positive-activation subscale (α = .68). Due to gender differences in emotional reactivity traits, group norms (sten scale) were calculated separately for females and males.

Conclusions: The Polish version of the PERS-S has strong psychometric properties. Its practical applications are discussed.

积极和消极情绪的激活、强度和持续时间评估:波兰语版珀斯情绪反应量表--简表的心理测量特性。
背景介绍珀斯情绪反应性量表-简表(PERS-S)是一份包含 18 个项目的自我报告问卷,用于评估情绪反应性。PERS-S 可测量消极和积极情绪的激活、强度和持续时间。本研究旨在验证波兰语版本的 PERS-S:研究对象为 675 名年龄在 18-80 岁之间的样本(M=28.88,SD=13.17,56.15% 为女性)。通过确认性因子分析验证了不同性别、年龄和教育程度类别的因子结构和测量不变性。根据 PERS-S 量表与行为表现特征-气质量表中的情绪反应量表、情绪调节问卷、知觉压力量表、沃里克-爱丁堡心理健康量表和主观活力量表之间的关系,对收敛效度和发散效度进行了评估:预期的 6 因子模型非常适合数据(CFI = .963;TLI = .953;RMSEA = .053,90% CI [.046;.061];SRR = .057),并且在不同性别、教育水平和年龄组之间保持不变。正如预期的那样,PERS-S 的所有分量表都与另一份情绪反应问卷、压力、情绪调节策略、幸福感和活力相关。所有分量表的信度都很高(α > .70),只有积极激活分量表的信度稍低(α = .68)。由于在情绪反应特质上存在性别差异,因此分别计算了女性和男性的团体标准(sten 量表):波兰版 PERS-S 具有很强的心理测量特性。对其实际应用进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信