Classic sports massage vs. Chinese self-massage. Which one is more effective in warm-up?

IF 0.8 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES

Biomedical Human Kinetics Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2478/bhk-2021-0012

D. Boguszewski, J. Adamczyk, Aleksandra Hanc, A. Szymanska, Sylwia Chełchowska, D. Białoszewski

{"title":"Classic sports massage vs. Chinese self-massage. Which one is more effective in warm-up?","authors":"D. Boguszewski, J. Adamczyk, Aleksandra Hanc, A. Szymanska, Sylwia Chełchowska, D. Białoszewski","doi":"10.2478/bhk-2021-0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Study aim: Warm-up is an indispensable element of sports training. The aim of the study was to determine the effect of warm-up exercises with Swedish, classic sports massage and Chinese self-massage on functional limitations of the locomotive system. Materials and methods: The study included 42 women and 13 men aged 19 to 22. They all performed the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) test, without a warm-up, and then (after a week) performed it again after either a standard warm-up with sports massage (Group 1) or a warm-up with Chinese self-massage (Group 2). Results: Both groups obtained significantly higher results in the second measurement (FMS test), preceded by a standard warm-up with sports massage (Group 1, p = 0.003) and warm-up with Chinese self-massage (Group 2, p = 0.000). In Group 1, statistically significant differences were observed in the results of the exercises: hurdle step and push-ups. In Group 2, the difference was significant in the attempts to sit down deep, walk over the fence and pump. Conclusion: There were no significant differences between the groups that used massage and self-massage. Both methods can improve movement functionality.","PeriodicalId":44223,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Human Kinetics","volume":"47 1","pages":"97 - 102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Human Kinetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/bhk-2021-0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Study aim: Warm-up is an indispensable element of sports training. The aim of the study was to determine the effect of warm-up exercises with Swedish, classic sports massage and Chinese self-massage on functional limitations of the locomotive system. Materials and methods: The study included 42 women and 13 men aged 19 to 22. They all performed the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) test, without a warm-up, and then (after a week) performed it again after either a standard warm-up with sports massage (Group 1) or a warm-up with Chinese self-massage (Group 2). Results: Both groups obtained significantly higher results in the second measurement (FMS test), preceded by a standard warm-up with sports massage (Group 1, p = 0.003) and warm-up with Chinese self-massage (Group 2, p = 0.000). In Group 1, statistically significant differences were observed in the results of the exercises: hurdle step and push-ups. In Group 2, the difference was significant in the attempts to sit down deep, walk over the fence and pump. Conclusion: There were no significant differences between the groups that used massage and self-massage. Both methods can improve movement functionality.

查看原文本刊更多论文

经典运动按摩vs中国式自我按摩。哪一个在热身时更有效?

摘要研究目的:热身是运动训练中不可缺少的组成部分。本研究的目的是确定瑞典式、经典运动按摩和中国式自我按摩的热身运动对机车系统功能限制的影响。材料与方法:研究对象为42名女性和13名男性，年龄在19 - 22岁之间。他们都进行了功能运动屏幕(FMS)测试，没有热身，然后(一周后)在运动按摩的标准热身(第1组)或中国自我按摩的热身(第2组)之后再次进行功能运动屏幕测试。结果:两组在第二次测量(FMS测试)中获得了显著更高的结果，在此之前进行了运动按摩的标准热身(第1组，p = 0.003)和中国自我按摩的热身(第2组，p = 0.000)。在第一组中，跨栏步和俯卧撑的训练结果有统计学意义。在第二组中，在尝试深坐、走过篱笆和抽水方面，差异是显著的。结论:按摩组与自我按摩组之间无显著性差异。这两种方法都可以改善运动功能。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Biomedical Human Kinetics HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

12.50%

发文量

审稿时长

15 weeks

期刊介绍： The leading idea is the health-directed quality of life. The journal thus covers many biomedical areas related to physical activity, e.g. physiology, biochemistry, biomechanics, anthropology, medical issues associated with physical activities, physical and motor development, psychological and sociological issues associated with physical activities, rehabilitation, health-related sport issues and fitness, etc.