Drinking Water Disparities in North Carolina Communities Served by Private Wells.

IF 1.3 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Andrew George, Kathleen Gray, Kory Wait, Daniel Gallagher, Marc Edwards, Jefferson Currie, Judy Hogan, Alfred W Kwasikpui, Kelsey J Pieper
{"title":"Drinking Water Disparities in North Carolina Communities Served by Private Wells.","authors":"Andrew George, Kathleen Gray, Kory Wait, Daniel Gallagher, Marc Edwards, Jefferson Currie, Judy Hogan, Alfred W Kwasikpui, Kelsey J Pieper","doi":"10.1089/env.2022.0100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the United States, most private wells are not tested for contaminants, especially in low-income communities, unless state or local testing regulations have been enacted. Few studies have addressed whether Black, Indigenous, and other People of Color (BIPOC) experience similar burden disparities in testing and private well stewardship.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Focusing on four North Carolina regions impacted by 2018 hurricanes (Florence and Michael), researchers and community-based organizations partnered to assess: (1) contamination levels of metals in private wells and (2) differences in water quality and well stewardship among demographic groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Well tests revealed contamination exceeding a federal or state standard or public health goal in more than 67% of the samples. Of 476 private well users enrolled in this study, 44% (<i>n</i> = 209) had previously tested their drinking water, yet more than 58% (<i>n</i> = 192) reported having a treatment system installed. White, high-income households had over 10 times greater odds of testing their private wells, and over 4 times greater odds of treating their drinking water than BIPOC, low-income households.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In this study, private well testing and treatment levels were significantly predicted by race and income (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Although high contamination levels (67%) were equally distributed across the sample, the lack of private well testing and treatment means BIPOC, low-income groups may experience greater burden disparities in exposure to toxic metals in drinking water.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Well-reliant populations in socially and economically marginalized communities will likely remain unaware of potential exposure to contaminated drinking water absent focused efforts to encourage well testing and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":46143,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Justice","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12326544/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2022.0100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the United States, most private wells are not tested for contaminants, especially in low-income communities, unless state or local testing regulations have been enacted. Few studies have addressed whether Black, Indigenous, and other People of Color (BIPOC) experience similar burden disparities in testing and private well stewardship.

Methods: Focusing on four North Carolina regions impacted by 2018 hurricanes (Florence and Michael), researchers and community-based organizations partnered to assess: (1) contamination levels of metals in private wells and (2) differences in water quality and well stewardship among demographic groups.

Results: Well tests revealed contamination exceeding a federal or state standard or public health goal in more than 67% of the samples. Of 476 private well users enrolled in this study, 44% (n = 209) had previously tested their drinking water, yet more than 58% (n = 192) reported having a treatment system installed. White, high-income households had over 10 times greater odds of testing their private wells, and over 4 times greater odds of treating their drinking water than BIPOC, low-income households.

Discussion: In this study, private well testing and treatment levels were significantly predicted by race and income (p < 0.05). Although high contamination levels (67%) were equally distributed across the sample, the lack of private well testing and treatment means BIPOC, low-income groups may experience greater burden disparities in exposure to toxic metals in drinking water.

Conclusions: Well-reliant populations in socially and economically marginalized communities will likely remain unaware of potential exposure to contaminated drinking water absent focused efforts to encourage well testing and treatment.

北卡罗来纳州私人水井服务社区的饮用水差异。
背景:在美国,除非州或地方颁布了检测法规,否则大多数私人井都不进行污染物检测,特别是在低收入社区。很少有研究涉及黑人、原住民和其他有色人种(BIPOC)在测试和私人油井管理方面是否存在类似的负担差异。方法:研究人员与社区组织合作,以受2018年飓风影响的北卡罗来纳州四个地区(佛罗伦萨和迈克尔)为重点,评估:(1)私人水井中金属的污染水平;(2)不同人口群体之间水质和水井管理的差异。结果:油井测试显示,超过67%的样本污染超过联邦或州标准或公共卫生目标。在参与这项研究的476个私人水井用户中,44% (n = 209)之前测试过他们的饮用水,但超过58% (n = 192)报告安装了处理系统。白人,高收入家庭检测私人水井的几率是低收入家庭的10倍以上,处理饮用水的几率是低收入家庭的4倍以上。讨论:在本研究中,种族和收入显著预测了私人井测试和处理水平(p < 0.05)。尽管高污染水平(67%)平均分布在整个样本中,但缺乏私人井测试和处理意味着BIPOC,低收入群体可能在饮用水中接触有毒金属方面面临更大的负担差异。结论:在社会和经济边缘化的社区中,依赖水井的人群可能仍然不知道潜在的污染饮用水暴露,如果没有集中努力鼓励水井检测和处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Justice
Environmental Justice ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Environmental Justice, a quarterly peer-reviewed journal, is the central forum for the research, debate, and discussion of the equitable treatment and involvement of all people, especially minority and low-income populations, with respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies. The Journal explores the adverse and disparate environmental burden impacting marginalized populations and communities all over the world. Environmental Justice draws upon the expertise and perspectives of all parties involved in environmental justice struggles: communities, industry, academia, government, and nonprofit organizations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信