The Value of MRI in Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Tumors

S. Bayar, Pratima Mahaseth, Q. Feng
{"title":"The Value of MRI in Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Tumors","authors":"S. Bayar, Pratima Mahaseth, Q. Feng","doi":"10.4172/2167-0846.1000307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To investigate the value of 3.0 T MRI in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic tumor. \nMaterials and Methods: Aggregate of 36 patients were enlisted with suspected or proven as solid pancreatic tumors were collected from the first affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University Teaching Hospital during the period of January 2012 to August 2015, contained 20 cases of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 7 cases of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs), 5 cases of pancreatic metastases, 4 cases of solid pseudopapillary tumors (SPTP). All the patients performed with plain scan and multiphasic contrast enhanced imaging on 3.0 T MR, 23 cases performed with MRCP. The data of clinic and imaging were retrospectively analyzed. \nResults: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma was irregular in shape, lesion was hypo intense in 10 cases, slightly hypo intense in 9 cases and isointense in one case on T1WI. 10 tumor showed slightly enhancement in arterial phase, and all of tumors showed moderate enhancement during portal and delayed phase; 19 cases showed double duct sign, and one case showed distal pancreatic duct dilation. Of the 7 cases with PNETs, the margin was well defined in six well differentiated lesions and ill-defined in one pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma; six tumors were marked enhancement in arterial phase and one tumor was moderate enhancement in pancreatic parenchyma in all of three phases. The mean diameter of SPTP was 5.2 cm. The solid part of tumors was hyperintense on T1WI and slightly hyper intense on T2WI, with progressively enhancement. 4 SPTPs had capsule which were hyperintense on T1WI and T2WI exhibited moderate enhancement. Of the 5 pancreatic metastases, one cases had only one lesion, two cases had multiple lesions and two cases showed diffuse pancreatic enlargement, one case showed heterogenous slightly enhancement, two case showed peripheral rim enhancement, two case showed marked enhancement in arterial, then wash-out in delayed and portal phases. \nConclusion: MRI is valuable for diagnosis and distinguishing solid pancreatic tumors.","PeriodicalId":16641,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain and Relief","volume":"85 1","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain and Relief","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0846.1000307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To investigate the value of 3.0 T MRI in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic tumor. Materials and Methods: Aggregate of 36 patients were enlisted with suspected or proven as solid pancreatic tumors were collected from the first affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University Teaching Hospital during the period of January 2012 to August 2015, contained 20 cases of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 7 cases of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs), 5 cases of pancreatic metastases, 4 cases of solid pseudopapillary tumors (SPTP). All the patients performed with plain scan and multiphasic contrast enhanced imaging on 3.0 T MR, 23 cases performed with MRCP. The data of clinic and imaging were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma was irregular in shape, lesion was hypo intense in 10 cases, slightly hypo intense in 9 cases and isointense in one case on T1WI. 10 tumor showed slightly enhancement in arterial phase, and all of tumors showed moderate enhancement during portal and delayed phase; 19 cases showed double duct sign, and one case showed distal pancreatic duct dilation. Of the 7 cases with PNETs, the margin was well defined in six well differentiated lesions and ill-defined in one pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma; six tumors were marked enhancement in arterial phase and one tumor was moderate enhancement in pancreatic parenchyma in all of three phases. The mean diameter of SPTP was 5.2 cm. The solid part of tumors was hyperintense on T1WI and slightly hyper intense on T2WI, with progressively enhancement. 4 SPTPs had capsule which were hyperintense on T1WI and T2WI exhibited moderate enhancement. Of the 5 pancreatic metastases, one cases had only one lesion, two cases had multiple lesions and two cases showed diffuse pancreatic enlargement, one case showed heterogenous slightly enhancement, two case showed peripheral rim enhancement, two case showed marked enhancement in arterial, then wash-out in delayed and portal phases. Conclusion: MRI is valuable for diagnosis and distinguishing solid pancreatic tumors.
MRI在胰腺实体瘤诊断中的价值
目的:探讨3.0 T MRI对胰腺实性肿瘤的诊断价值。材料与方法:收集2012年1月至2015年8月安徽医科大学附属第一医院疑似或证实为实体性胰腺肿瘤的患者36例,其中胰腺腺癌20例,胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤(PNETs) 7例,胰腺转移瘤5例,实体性假乳头状肿瘤(SPTP) 4例。所有患者均行3.0 T MR平扫及多相增强成像,其中23例行MRCP。回顾性分析临床及影像学资料。结果:胰腺腺癌形态不规则,T1WI呈低强度病变10例,轻度低强度病变9例,等强度病变1例。10例肿瘤动脉期轻度强化,门脉期和延迟期均中度强化;双管征19例,远端胰管扩张1例。在7例PNETs中,6例分化良好的病变边界清晰,1例胰腺神经内分泌癌边界不清;6个肿瘤在动脉期表现为明显强化,1个肿瘤在三个阶段均表现为胰腺实质中度强化。SPTP平均直径为5.2 cm。肿瘤实部T1WI呈高影,T2WI呈微高影,呈渐进式增强。4例sptp患者T1WI呈高信号,T2WI呈中度增强。5例胰腺转移灶中,1例单发灶,2例多发灶,2例胰腺弥漫性增大,1例表现为异质性轻度强化,2例表现为外周边缘强化,2例表现为动脉明显强化,后表现为延迟期和门脉期消失。结论:MRI对胰腺实体瘤的诊断和鉴别具有重要价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信