Validation of Student Worksheet (LKPD) Based Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) Assisted with PhET to Train Argumentation Skills the Pressure Materials

Yunita Ayana, F. Fakhruddin, Zulfarina Zulfarina
{"title":"Validation of Student Worksheet (LKPD) Based Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) Assisted with PhET to Train Argumentation Skills the Pressure Materials","authors":"Yunita Ayana, F. Fakhruddin, Zulfarina Zulfarina","doi":"10.15294/usej.v11i2.58185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine the feasibility of student worksheets based on the PhET-assisted Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) to train students’ argumentation skills on the subject of substance pressure. This research uses Research and Development (R&D) research using a 4-D development model (Define, Design, Development, and Dissemination). This study uses the LKPD validation sheet instrument, which consists of 6 assessment aspects. The research data was obtained from the validation test results by three validators consisting of two physics education lecturers and one science education lecturer at the University of Riau. The validation test results for developing an Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) based on PhET from each validator were 3.63%, 3.57%, and 3.53%, respectively. So that the average validator results reach 3.58% in the very valid category. Based on the results of the validity assessment, it can be concluded that the development of PhET-assisted Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI)-based worksheets on substance pressure materials is included in the appropriate category to be used as teaching materials to train students’ argumentation skills in the learning process.","PeriodicalId":30735,"journal":{"name":"USEJ Unnes Science Education Journal","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"USEJ Unnes Science Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/usej.v11i2.58185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to determine the feasibility of student worksheets based on the PhET-assisted Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) to train students’ argumentation skills on the subject of substance pressure. This research uses Research and Development (R&D) research using a 4-D development model (Define, Design, Development, and Dissemination). This study uses the LKPD validation sheet instrument, which consists of 6 assessment aspects. The research data was obtained from the validation test results by three validators consisting of two physics education lecturers and one science education lecturer at the University of Riau. The validation test results for developing an Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) based on PhET from each validator were 3.63%, 3.57%, and 3.53%, respectively. So that the average validator results reach 3.58% in the very valid category. Based on the results of the validity assessment, it can be concluded that the development of PhET-assisted Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI)-based worksheets on substance pressure materials is included in the appropriate category to be used as teaching materials to train students’ argumentation skills in the learning process.
基于论证驱动型查询(ADI)的学生工作表验证帮助PhET训练压力材料的论证技能
本研究的目的是确定学生工作表的可行性,基于phet辅助论据驱动的探究(ADI),以培养学生在物质压力的主题上的论证技能。本研究采用4-D开发模型(定义、设计、开发和传播)进行研发(R&D)研究。本研究采用LKPD验证表工具,由6个评估方面组成。研究数据来自廖内大学两名物理教育讲师和一名科学教育讲师三名验证者的验证测试结果。基于PhET开发论证驱动查询(ADI)的验证测试结果分别为3.63%、3.57%和3.53%。因此,在非常有效的类别中,验证器的平均结果达到3.58%。根据效度评估的结果,可以得出结论,基于物质压力材料的pht辅助论证驱动探究(ADI)工作表的开发被纳入适当的类别,作为教学材料,在学习过程中训练学生的论证技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信