Assessing and addressing barriers towards MDI use in acute asthma exacerbations at a tertiary pediatric ED in the United Arab Emirates

Q2 Medicine
Nida Fatima Sakrani , Salah Eldin Hussein , Malcolm Borg , Sofia Konstantinopoulou
{"title":"Assessing and addressing barriers towards MDI use in acute asthma exacerbations at a tertiary pediatric ED in the United Arab Emirates","authors":"Nida Fatima Sakrani ,&nbsp;Salah Eldin Hussein ,&nbsp;Malcolm Borg ,&nbsp;Sofia Konstantinopoulou","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpam.2021.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Asthma is one of the most common causes of emergency department (ED) visits in children. Therapy delivered through a meter dose inhaler with spacer (MDI + S) is equally as effective as nebulization in mild and moderate asthma exacerbations but was not routinely prescribed in the ED at the largest tertiary center for pediatrics in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Phase 1 of this cohort study involved a validated survey to evaluate physicians’ knowledge, attitudes and perceptions towards MDI therapy. While 62% of physicians reported that MDI + S was equally effective as nebulizers and 82% believed that they had sufficient knowledge with regard to its use, only 28% prescribed it. Perceived barriers to change of practice included: Lack of clinical practice guidelines (CPG), poor knowledge amongst nurses and physicians, caregivers’ reluctance and a difficult prescription process. Phase 2 consisted of administering the same survey after completing interventions to address the aforementioned barriers. Comparisons were made between the subgroups within phase 1 and statistically significant differences were noted with a p value &lt; .05. The number of physicians who prescribed MDI + S increased from 28% to 41% (p value = .046). Moreover, physicians who believed that convincing parents to use MDI + S therapy would be easy, increased from 35% to 66% (p value &lt; .0001). In conclusion, more physicians reported prescribing MDI + S in Phase 2 while concerns about barriers that exist to change in practice remained similar in both phases showing that consistent and prolonged advocacy is required to achieve long-term compliance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36646,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine","volume":"9 1","pages":"Pages 41-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ijpam.2021.03.004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352646721000284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Asthma is one of the most common causes of emergency department (ED) visits in children. Therapy delivered through a meter dose inhaler with spacer (MDI + S) is equally as effective as nebulization in mild and moderate asthma exacerbations but was not routinely prescribed in the ED at the largest tertiary center for pediatrics in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Phase 1 of this cohort study involved a validated survey to evaluate physicians’ knowledge, attitudes and perceptions towards MDI therapy. While 62% of physicians reported that MDI + S was equally effective as nebulizers and 82% believed that they had sufficient knowledge with regard to its use, only 28% prescribed it. Perceived barriers to change of practice included: Lack of clinical practice guidelines (CPG), poor knowledge amongst nurses and physicians, caregivers’ reluctance and a difficult prescription process. Phase 2 consisted of administering the same survey after completing interventions to address the aforementioned barriers. Comparisons were made between the subgroups within phase 1 and statistically significant differences were noted with a p value < .05. The number of physicians who prescribed MDI + S increased from 28% to 41% (p value = .046). Moreover, physicians who believed that convincing parents to use MDI + S therapy would be easy, increased from 35% to 66% (p value < .0001). In conclusion, more physicians reported prescribing MDI + S in Phase 2 while concerns about barriers that exist to change in practice remained similar in both phases showing that consistent and prolonged advocacy is required to achieve long-term compliance.

评估和解决阿拉伯联合酋长国第三儿科急诊科在急性哮喘加重中使用MDI的障碍
哮喘是儿童急诊科(ED)就诊的最常见原因之一。在轻度和中度哮喘加重中,通过带间隔剂的米剂量吸入器(MDI + S)进行治疗与雾化治疗同样有效,但在阿拉伯联合酋长国(UAE)最大的三级儿科中心的急诊科中,没有常规处方。本队列研究的第一阶段包括一项有效的调查,以评估医生对MDI治疗的知识、态度和看法。虽然62%的医生报告MDI + S与雾化器同样有效,82%的医生认为他们对其使用有足够的了解,但只有28%的医生开了处方。改变实践的感知障碍包括:缺乏临床实践指南(CPG),护士和医生之间的知识贫乏,护理人员的不情愿和困难的处方过程。第二阶段包括在完成解决上述障碍的干预措施后进行相同的调查。第1期亚组间比较,p值为<,差异有统计学意义;. 05。开MDI + S的医生数量从28%增加到41% (p值= 0.046)。此外,认为说服父母使用MDI + S疗法很容易的医生从35%增加到66% (p值<。)。总之,更多的医生报告在第二阶段开了MDI + S处方,而对实践中存在的障碍的担忧在这两个阶段仍然相似,这表明需要持续和长期的宣传来实现长期依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine
International Journal of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信