Distinct roles for the anterior temporal lobe and angular gyrus in the spatiotemporal cortical semantic network

S. Farahibozorg, R. Henson, A. Woollams, O. Hauk
{"title":"Distinct roles for the anterior temporal lobe and angular gyrus in the spatiotemporal cortical semantic network","authors":"S. Farahibozorg, R. Henson, A. Woollams, O. Hauk","doi":"10.1101/544114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is now well recognised that human semantic knowledge is supported by a large neural network distributed over multiple brain regions, but the dynamic organisation of this network remains unknown. Some studies have proposed that a central semantic hub coordinates this network. We explored the possibility of different types of semantic hubs; namely “representational hubs”, whose neural activity is modulated by semantic variables, and “connectivity hubs”, whose connectivity to distributed areas is modulated by semantic variables. We utilised the spatio-temporal resolution of source-estimated Electro-/Magnetoencephalography data in a word-concreteness task (17 participants, 12 female) in order to: (i) find representational hubs at different timepoints based on semantic modulation of evoked brain activity in source space; (ii) identify connectivity hubs among left Anterior Temporal Lobe (ATL), Angular Gyrus (AG), Middle Temporal Gyrus and Inferior Frontal Gyrus based on their functional connectivity to the whole cortex, in particular sensory-motor-limbic systems; and (iii) explicitly compare network models with and without an intermediate hub linking sensory input to other candidate hub regions using Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) of evoked responses. ATL’s activity was modulated as early as 150ms post-stimulus, while both ATL and AG showed modulations of functional connectivity with sensory-motor-limbic areas from 150-450ms. DCM favoured models with one intermediate hub, namely ATL in an early time window and AG in a later time-window. Our results support ATL as a single representational hub with an early onset, but suggest that both ATL and AG function as connectivity hubs depending on the stage of semantic processing.","PeriodicalId":9825,"journal":{"name":"Cerebral Cortex (New York, NY)","volume":"59 1","pages":"4549 - 4564"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebral Cortex (New York, NY)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/544114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

It is now well recognised that human semantic knowledge is supported by a large neural network distributed over multiple brain regions, but the dynamic organisation of this network remains unknown. Some studies have proposed that a central semantic hub coordinates this network. We explored the possibility of different types of semantic hubs; namely “representational hubs”, whose neural activity is modulated by semantic variables, and “connectivity hubs”, whose connectivity to distributed areas is modulated by semantic variables. We utilised the spatio-temporal resolution of source-estimated Electro-/Magnetoencephalography data in a word-concreteness task (17 participants, 12 female) in order to: (i) find representational hubs at different timepoints based on semantic modulation of evoked brain activity in source space; (ii) identify connectivity hubs among left Anterior Temporal Lobe (ATL), Angular Gyrus (AG), Middle Temporal Gyrus and Inferior Frontal Gyrus based on their functional connectivity to the whole cortex, in particular sensory-motor-limbic systems; and (iii) explicitly compare network models with and without an intermediate hub linking sensory input to other candidate hub regions using Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) of evoked responses. ATL’s activity was modulated as early as 150ms post-stimulus, while both ATL and AG showed modulations of functional connectivity with sensory-motor-limbic areas from 150-450ms. DCM favoured models with one intermediate hub, namely ATL in an early time window and AG in a later time-window. Our results support ATL as a single representational hub with an early onset, but suggest that both ATL and AG function as connectivity hubs depending on the stage of semantic processing.
前颞叶和角回在时空皮层语义网络中的不同作用
现在人们已经认识到,人类的语义知识是由分布在多个大脑区域的大型神经网络支持的,但是这个网络的动态组织仍然是未知的。一些研究提出一个中央语义枢纽协调这个网络。我们探索了不同类型语义中心的可能性;即“表征中心”,其神经活动由语义变量调节;“连接中心”,其与分布式区域的连接由语义变量调节。我们在单词具体化任务(17名参与者,12名女性)中利用源估计的脑电/脑磁图数据的时空分辨率,以便:(i)基于源空间中诱发的大脑活动的语义调制,在不同的时间点找到代表性中心;(ii)根据左颞叶前叶(ATL)、角回(AG)、颞中回和额下回与整个皮层(特别是感觉-运动-边缘系统)的功能连接,确定它们之间的连接枢纽;(iii)使用诱发反应的动态因果模型(DCM)明确比较有和没有中间中枢连接感觉输入和其他候选中枢区域的网络模型。ATL的活动早在刺激后150ms就出现了调节,而ATL和AG在刺激后150-450ms均表现出与感觉-运动-边缘区功能连接的调节。DCM倾向于具有一个中间枢纽的模型,即ATL在早期时间窗口,AG在较晚的时间窗口。我们的结果支持ATL作为一个早期发作的单一表征中心,但表明ATL和AG都作为连接中心发挥作用,这取决于语义处理的阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信