COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF FLEXURAL STIFFNESS OF CONCRETE ELEMENTS WITH DIFFERENT TYPES OF COMPOSITE REINFORCEMENT SYSTEMS

Haji Akbar Sulatani, V. Gribniak, Arvydas Rimkus, A. Sokolov, L. Torres
{"title":"COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF FLEXURAL STIFFNESS OF CONCRETE ELEMENTS WITH DIFFERENT TYPES OF COMPOSITE REINFORCEMENT SYSTEMS","authors":"Haji Akbar Sulatani, V. Gribniak, Arvydas Rimkus, A. Sokolov, L. Torres","doi":"10.3846/mla.2021.13713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Various materials and reinforcement technologies have been created for concrete structures. However, there is no uniform methodology to compare the mechanical characteristics of different reinforcement systems. In structural systems, residual stiffness can estimate the efficiency of the reinforcement. This study introduces a simplified approach for the flexural stiffness analysis. It employs a new testing layout designed with the purpose to form multiple cracks in a small laboratory specimen. The achieved solution requires neither iterative calculations nor a description of the loading history. Several composite reinforcement schemes, including internal glass fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars, carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP) sheets and near-surface mounted (NSM) strips are considered. The analysis of the test results reveals a substantial efficiency of the external CFRP reinforcement systems.","PeriodicalId":30324,"journal":{"name":"Mokslas Lietuvos Ateitis","volume":"202 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mokslas Lietuvos Ateitis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/mla.2021.13713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Various materials and reinforcement technologies have been created for concrete structures. However, there is no uniform methodology to compare the mechanical characteristics of different reinforcement systems. In structural systems, residual stiffness can estimate the efficiency of the reinforcement. This study introduces a simplified approach for the flexural stiffness analysis. It employs a new testing layout designed with the purpose to form multiple cracks in a small laboratory specimen. The achieved solution requires neither iterative calculations nor a description of the loading history. Several composite reinforcement schemes, including internal glass fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars, carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP) sheets and near-surface mounted (NSM) strips are considered. The analysis of the test results reveals a substantial efficiency of the external CFRP reinforcement systems.
不同类型复合配筋体系混凝土构件抗弯刚度比较分析
为混凝土结构创造了各种材料和加固技术。然而,目前还没有统一的方法来比较不同加固体系的力学特性。在结构体系中,剩余刚度可以用来评价配筋的有效性。本文介绍了一种简化的抗弯刚度分析方法。它采用了一种新的测试布局,设计的目的是在一个小的实验室样品中形成多个裂缝。实现的解决方案既不需要迭代计算,也不需要对加载历史的描述。考虑了几种复合增强方案,包括内部玻璃纤维增强聚合物(GFRP)棒,碳纤维增强聚合物(CFRP)片和近表面安装(NSM)条。试验结果分析表明,CFRP外加固体系具有显著的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信