‘More than Marking and Moderation’: A Self-Study of Teacher Educator Learning through Engaging with Graduate Teaching Performance Assessment

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
R. Brandenburg, A. Fletcher, Anitra Gorriss-Hunter, Cameron Van der Smee, Wendy Holcombe, Katrina Griffiths, Karen Schneider
{"title":"‘More than Marking and Moderation’: A Self-Study of Teacher Educator Learning through Engaging with Graduate Teaching Performance Assessment","authors":"R. Brandenburg, A. Fletcher, Anitra Gorriss-Hunter, Cameron Van der Smee, Wendy Holcombe, Katrina Griffiths, Karen Schneider","doi":"10.1080/17425964.2022.2164761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Global attention continues to focus on the quality of teaching, teacher quality, teacher education programs and the preparation of graduates who are ready to teach. This self-study research focuses on one aspect of the preparation and assessment of graduates for teaching: the marking and moderation of a Teaching Assessment Performance (TPA), a mandated assessment tool implemented in Australian universities and education institutions that is used as one key determinant to assess graduate readiness for the profession. While there is a developing field of research related to the implementation and effectiveness of TPAs, less is known about the teacher educator expertise required to mark and moderate these assessments. The purpose of this self-study, conducted at Federation University, a regional university in Australia, aimed to identify and examine teacher educator marker and moderator experience and expertise through the establishment of a professional learning community (PLC). Using audio-recorded transcripts of team meetings and teacher educator vignettes, the data were analysed using NVivo and were individually and collectively categorised and coded. Reflecting in and on our practice, we focused on critical moments, interactions, and experiences to interrogate the data. The key themes included: 1) collaboration through marking and moderation; 2) reflection through critical engagement; 3) growth as a teacher educator and 4) enactment in teacher educator practice. This self-study of practice, using a PLC, enabled us to make our often-tacit knowledge, understanding and expertise explicit, and provided frameworks and structures for enacting this new knowledge in practice.","PeriodicalId":45793,"journal":{"name":"Studying Teacher Education","volume":"8 1","pages":"330 - 350"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studying Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2022.2164761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Global attention continues to focus on the quality of teaching, teacher quality, teacher education programs and the preparation of graduates who are ready to teach. This self-study research focuses on one aspect of the preparation and assessment of graduates for teaching: the marking and moderation of a Teaching Assessment Performance (TPA), a mandated assessment tool implemented in Australian universities and education institutions that is used as one key determinant to assess graduate readiness for the profession. While there is a developing field of research related to the implementation and effectiveness of TPAs, less is known about the teacher educator expertise required to mark and moderate these assessments. The purpose of this self-study, conducted at Federation University, a regional university in Australia, aimed to identify and examine teacher educator marker and moderator experience and expertise through the establishment of a professional learning community (PLC). Using audio-recorded transcripts of team meetings and teacher educator vignettes, the data were analysed using NVivo and were individually and collectively categorised and coded. Reflecting in and on our practice, we focused on critical moments, interactions, and experiences to interrogate the data. The key themes included: 1) collaboration through marking and moderation; 2) reflection through critical engagement; 3) growth as a teacher educator and 4) enactment in teacher educator practice. This self-study of practice, using a PLC, enabled us to make our often-tacit knowledge, understanding and expertise explicit, and provided frameworks and structures for enacting this new knowledge in practice.
“不仅仅是评分和节制”:参与研究生教学绩效评估的教师教育学习自我研究
全球的注意力继续集中在教学质量、教师素质、教师教育计划和准备教书的毕业生的准备上。这项自学研究的重点是准备和评估毕业生教学的一个方面:教学评估绩效(TPA)的评分和调节,这是一项在澳大利亚大学和教育机构实施的强制性评估工具,被用作评估毕业生职业准备的一个关键决定因素。虽然与tpa的实施和有效性相关的研究领域正在发展,但对教师和教育工作者对这些评估进行评分和调节所需的专业知识知之甚少。本研究在澳大利亚的一所地区性大学联邦大学进行,旨在通过建立一个专业学习社区(PLC)来识别和检验教师、教育者、市场参与者和主持人的经验和专业知识。利用团队会议的录音记录和教师教育短片,使用NVivo对数据进行分析,并对其进行单独和集体分类和编码。反思我们的实践,我们专注于关键时刻,互动和经验来询问数据。主要主题包括:1)通过评分和审核进行协作;2)通过批判性参与进行反思;3)作为教师教育者的成长和4)在教师教育者实践中的制定。这种实践的自学,使用PLC,使我们能够使我们经常隐性的知识,理解和专业知识明确,并为在实践中制定这些新知识提供框架和结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studying Teacher Education
Studying Teacher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
43.80%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Studying Teacher Education invites submissions from authors who have a strong interest in improving the quality of teaching generally and of teacher education in particular. The central purpose of the journal is to disseminate high-quality research and dialogue in self-study of teacher education practices. Thus the journal is primarily a forum for teacher educators who work in contexts and programs of teacher education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信