Die Tonarten der klassischen Vokalpolyphonie im Konflikt der deutschen Musikwissenschaft

IF 0.1 2区 艺术学 0 MUSIC
H. Loos
{"title":"Die Tonarten der klassischen Vokalpolyphonie im Konflikt der deutschen Musikwissenschaft","authors":"H. Loos","doi":"10.25162/afmw-2020-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since its revival in German musicology in the 1950s, Renaissance research has been accompanied by a fundamental methodological dispute between Carl Dahlhaus and Bernhard Meier. In his habilitation thesis of 1968, Dahlhaus attacked Meier’s rigorously historical, early studies that were based on the definitive importance of church modes for sixteenth-century composition. Dahlhaus, on the other hand, propagated an authentic-plagal general mode in the development towards major-minor tonality. Meier offered a fundamental critique of this approach in his 1974 publication The Modes of Classical Vocal Polyphony. Initially exposed not only to objective criticism but also to hostility, its importance as a scholarly treatise, fundamental to the understanding of the sixteenth-century music, only came to be appreciated posthumously.","PeriodicalId":42754,"journal":{"name":"ARCHIV FUR MUSIKWISSENSCHAFT","volume":"46 1","pages":"239-253"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCHIV FUR MUSIKWISSENSCHAFT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25162/afmw-2020-0011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since its revival in German musicology in the 1950s, Renaissance research has been accompanied by a fundamental methodological dispute between Carl Dahlhaus and Bernhard Meier. In his habilitation thesis of 1968, Dahlhaus attacked Meier’s rigorously historical, early studies that were based on the definitive importance of church modes for sixteenth-century composition. Dahlhaus, on the other hand, propagated an authentic-plagal general mode in the development towards major-minor tonality. Meier offered a fundamental critique of this approach in his 1974 publication The Modes of Classical Vocal Polyphony. Initially exposed not only to objective criticism but also to hostility, its importance as a scholarly treatise, fundamental to the understanding of the sixteenth-century music, only came to be appreciated posthumously.
在德国音乐的冲突中古典元音的语调
自20世纪50年代在德国音乐学中复兴以来,文艺复兴研究一直伴随着卡尔·达尔豪斯和伯恩哈德·迈耶之间的基本方法论争论。在他1968年的康复论文中,达尔豪斯抨击了迈耶严格的历史,早期的研究是基于教会模式对16世纪作曲的决定性重要性。另一方面,达尔豪斯在向大调-小调发展的过程中,传播了一种真实-悲歌的一般模式。Meier在他1974年出版的《古典声乐复调模式》中对这种方法提出了根本性的批评。最初不仅受到客观的批评,而且还受到敌意的批评,它作为一篇学术论文的重要性,是理解16世纪音乐的基础,直到死后才得到欣赏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书