Early postoperative mobilization in patients undergoing abdominal surgery: a best practice implementation project.

Yan Hu, A. McArthur, Zhenghong Yu
{"title":"Early postoperative mobilization in patients undergoing abdominal surgery: a best practice implementation project.","authors":"Yan Hu, A. McArthur, Zhenghong Yu","doi":"10.11124/jbisrir-d-19-00063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\nThe aim of this project was to improve early postoperative mobilization in patients undergoing abdominal surgery according to best practice.\n\n\nINTRODUCTION\nEarly mobilization is a crucial element of postoperative care; however, there are challenges implementing early mobilization protocols in daily practice. This project used the evidence to improve awareness and practice of early mobilization in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThis study utilized clinical audit strategies under the JBI Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System (JBI PACES) module. An audit-feedback cycle was used from April 2018 to August 2018. The baseline audit was conducted using 18 nurses and 30 patients in a general surgery ward. The Getting Research into Practice audit and feedback tool was used to identify barriers, strategies, resources and outcomes. After implementing evidence-based strategies, a re-audit was conducted following the same number of samples and audit criteria. We analyzed the compliance with best practice and its impact on length of hospitalization, postoperative physical activities, gastrointestinal function and complications.\n\n\nRESULTS\nAfter implementing best-practice strategies, the compliance rate of the six criteria improved as follows: criterion 1 from 0% to 100% (P = 0.000), criterion 2 from 87% to 100% (χ = 4.29, P = 0.038), criterion 3 from 60% to 70% (χ = 6.67, P = 0.010), criterion 4 from 7% to 79% (χ = 52.55, P = 0.000), criterion 5 from 40% to 70% (χ = 35.00, P = 0.000), and criterion 6 from 0% to 100% (P = 0.000). The differences in the length of hospitalization and physical activities between the pre-implementation and post-implementation were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). The rate of postoperative complications did not show a significant difference because of low occurrence.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe results indicate that evidence-based practice is an effective method for enhancing early recovery in patients undergoing abdominal surgery through promoting early mobilization. Sustaining best practice should continue through further follow-up audits.","PeriodicalId":73539,"journal":{"name":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/jbisrir-d-19-00063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

OBJECTIVES The aim of this project was to improve early postoperative mobilization in patients undergoing abdominal surgery according to best practice. INTRODUCTION Early mobilization is a crucial element of postoperative care; however, there are challenges implementing early mobilization protocols in daily practice. This project used the evidence to improve awareness and practice of early mobilization in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. METHODS This study utilized clinical audit strategies under the JBI Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System (JBI PACES) module. An audit-feedback cycle was used from April 2018 to August 2018. The baseline audit was conducted using 18 nurses and 30 patients in a general surgery ward. The Getting Research into Practice audit and feedback tool was used to identify barriers, strategies, resources and outcomes. After implementing evidence-based strategies, a re-audit was conducted following the same number of samples and audit criteria. We analyzed the compliance with best practice and its impact on length of hospitalization, postoperative physical activities, gastrointestinal function and complications. RESULTS After implementing best-practice strategies, the compliance rate of the six criteria improved as follows: criterion 1 from 0% to 100% (P = 0.000), criterion 2 from 87% to 100% (χ = 4.29, P = 0.038), criterion 3 from 60% to 70% (χ = 6.67, P = 0.010), criterion 4 from 7% to 79% (χ = 52.55, P = 0.000), criterion 5 from 40% to 70% (χ = 35.00, P = 0.000), and criterion 6 from 0% to 100% (P = 0.000). The differences in the length of hospitalization and physical activities between the pre-implementation and post-implementation were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). The rate of postoperative complications did not show a significant difference because of low occurrence. CONCLUSIONS The results indicate that evidence-based practice is an effective method for enhancing early recovery in patients undergoing abdominal surgery through promoting early mobilization. Sustaining best practice should continue through further follow-up audits.
腹部手术患者术后早期活动:最佳实践实施项目。
目的:根据最佳实践,提高腹部手术患者术后早期活动能力。早期活动是术后护理的关键因素;然而,在日常实践中实施早期动员方案存在挑战。本项目利用证据来提高腹部手术患者早期动员的意识和实践。方法本研究采用JBI临床证据系统实践应用(JBI PACES)模块下的临床审计策略。审计反馈周期为2018年4月至2018年8月。基线审计对普通外科病房的18名护士和30名患者进行。将研究转化为实践的审计和反馈工具用于识别障碍、策略、资源和结果。在实施循证战略后,按照相同数量的样本和审计标准进行了重新审计。我们分析了最佳实践的依从性及其对住院时间、术后身体活动、胃肠功能和并发症的影响。RESULTSAfter实施最佳实践策略,合规率的六个标准改进如下:标准1从0%降至100% (P = 0.000),标准2从87%到100%(χ= 4.29,P = 0.038),标准3从60%到70%(χ= 6.67,P = 0.010),标准4从7%到79%(χ= 52.55,P = 0.000),标准5从40%到70%(χ= 35.00,P = 0.000),及标准6从0%降至100% (P = 0.000)。实施前和实施后住院时间和体力活动的差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组术后并发症发生率均较低,无明显差异。结论循证实践是促进腹部手术患者早期康复的有效方法。应通过进一步的后续审计继续维持最佳实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信