Research on the Security of Visual Reasoning CAPTCHA

Yipeng Gao, Haichang Gao, Sainan Luo, Yang Zi, Shudong Zhang, Wenjie Mao, Ping Wang, Yulong Shen, Jeff Yan
{"title":"Research on the Security of Visual Reasoning CAPTCHA","authors":"Yipeng Gao, Haichang Gao, Sainan Luo, Yang Zi, Shudong Zhang, Wenjie Mao, Ping Wang, Yulong Shen, Jeff Yan","doi":"10.1109/tdsc.2023.3238408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CAPTCHA is an effective mechanism for protecting computers from malicious bots. With the development of deep learning techniques, current mainstream text-based and traditional image-based CAPTCHAs have been proven to be insecure. Therefore, a major effort has been directed toward developing new CAPTCHAs by utilizing some other hard Artificial Intelligence (AI) problems. Recently, some commercial companies (Tencent, NetEase, Geetest, etc.) have begun deploying a new type of CAPTCHA based on visual reasoning to defend against bots. As a newly proposed CAPTCHA, it is therefore natural to ask a fundamental question: are visual reasoning CAPTCHAs as secure as their designers expect? This paper explores the security of visual reasoning CAPTCHAs. We proposed a modular attack and evaluated it on six different real-world visual reasoning CAPTCHAs, which achieved overall success rates ranging from 79.2% to 98.6%. The results show that visual reasoning CAPTCHAs are not as secure as anticipated; this latest effort to use novel, hard AI problems for CAPTCHAs has not yet succeeded. Then, we summarize some guidelines for designing better visual-based CAPTCHAs, and based on the lessons we learned from our attacks, we propose a new CAPTCHA based on commonsense knowledge (CsCAPTCHA) and show its security and usability experimentally.","PeriodicalId":91597,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ... USENIX Security Symposium. UNIX Security Symposium","volume":"6 1","pages":"4976-4992"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ... USENIX Security Symposium. UNIX Security Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/tdsc.2023.3238408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

CAPTCHA is an effective mechanism for protecting computers from malicious bots. With the development of deep learning techniques, current mainstream text-based and traditional image-based CAPTCHAs have been proven to be insecure. Therefore, a major effort has been directed toward developing new CAPTCHAs by utilizing some other hard Artificial Intelligence (AI) problems. Recently, some commercial companies (Tencent, NetEase, Geetest, etc.) have begun deploying a new type of CAPTCHA based on visual reasoning to defend against bots. As a newly proposed CAPTCHA, it is therefore natural to ask a fundamental question: are visual reasoning CAPTCHAs as secure as their designers expect? This paper explores the security of visual reasoning CAPTCHAs. We proposed a modular attack and evaluated it on six different real-world visual reasoning CAPTCHAs, which achieved overall success rates ranging from 79.2% to 98.6%. The results show that visual reasoning CAPTCHAs are not as secure as anticipated; this latest effort to use novel, hard AI problems for CAPTCHAs has not yet succeeded. Then, we summarize some guidelines for designing better visual-based CAPTCHAs, and based on the lessons we learned from our attacks, we propose a new CAPTCHA based on commonsense knowledge (CsCAPTCHA) and show its security and usability experimentally.
视觉推理验证码安全性研究
验证码是保护计算机免受恶意机器人攻击的有效机制。随着深度学习技术的发展,目前主流的基于文本的验证码已被证明是不安全的。因此,主要的工作方向是开发基于图像的captcha,而基于图像的视觉推理正在成为这种发展的新方向。最近,腾讯部署了视觉图灵测试(VTT)验证码。这似乎是视觉推理方案的首次应用。随后,其他CAPTCHA服务商(Geetest,网易,钉向等)也提出了自己的视觉推理方案来防御机器人。因此,很自然地要问一个基本问题:视觉推理验证码是否像其设计者所期望的那样安全?本文提出了解决视觉推理验证码的第一次尝试。我们实施了整体攻击和模块化攻击,对VTT CAPTCHA的总体成功率分别为67.3%和88.0%。结果表明,视觉推理验证码并不像预期的那样安全;这一最新的尝试是在验证码中使用新颖、困难的人工智能问题,但尚未成功。根据我们从攻击中吸取的教训,我们还提供了一些设计具有更好安全性的视觉captcha的指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信