[Influence of agents for permanent drinking water disinfection on the fermentation performance of rumen microorganisms in ruminants].

IF 0.8 4区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
A Stettler, B Berchtold, S Probst
{"title":"[Influence of agents for permanent drinking water disinfection on the fermentation performance of rumen microorganisms in ruminants].","authors":"A Stettler, B Berchtold, S Probst","doi":"10.17236/sat00347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Good quality drinking water and adequate water intake is essential in ensuring the health of livestock. Various factors can cause the formation of a biofilm in water pipes that acts as a reservoir for many different pathogens. The addition of disinfection agents, such as chlorine dioxide or peracetic acid, is proven to improve the quality of permanent drinking water. To date this method has primarily been used in pig and poultry housing, however, it is increasingly under discussion for use in cattle husbandry. As the effects of disinfectants in drinking water on rumen fermentation are not yet known, we performed a digestibility test using the Hohenheim Feed Value Test to determine the in vitro digestibility of organic matter (IVOMD). The influence of five different concentrations of chlorine dioxide and peracetic acid disinfectants on the IVOMD of hay and wheat were tested and rumen bacteria were counted under a microscope. The use of chlorine dioxide showed no major changes in the IVOMD of hay and wheat. At the recommended concentration of 0.5 mg/l, the IVOMD relative to the control was 97,1 % for hay and 102,7 % for wheat. The number of rumen bacteria was not affected by the use of chlorine dioxide. Conversely, the use of peracetic acid led to a significant reduction in rumen fermentation. At the recommended concentration of 15-25 mg/l (dosed at 15 mg/l and 25 mg/l), the IVOMD relative to the control was 38,2 % and 38,4 % for hay and 50,4 % and 22,4 % for wheat. The number of rumen bacteria also decreased significantly. Chlorine dioxide seemed to have little to no disinfection effect on in vitro ruminal fermentation, however, the exact mechanisms could not be determined in the present study. This trial shows that disinfectants for permanent drinking water disinfection in cattle farming should be used with caution. In particular, disinfection agents containing peracetic acid may impair fermentation of rumen microbes. Further research is required to determine if the results of the present in vitro study are transferable to practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":21544,"journal":{"name":"Schweizer Archiv fur Tierheilkunde","volume":"35 1","pages":"166-173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schweizer Archiv fur Tierheilkunde","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17236/sat00347","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Good quality drinking water and adequate water intake is essential in ensuring the health of livestock. Various factors can cause the formation of a biofilm in water pipes that acts as a reservoir for many different pathogens. The addition of disinfection agents, such as chlorine dioxide or peracetic acid, is proven to improve the quality of permanent drinking water. To date this method has primarily been used in pig and poultry housing, however, it is increasingly under discussion for use in cattle husbandry. As the effects of disinfectants in drinking water on rumen fermentation are not yet known, we performed a digestibility test using the Hohenheim Feed Value Test to determine the in vitro digestibility of organic matter (IVOMD). The influence of five different concentrations of chlorine dioxide and peracetic acid disinfectants on the IVOMD of hay and wheat were tested and rumen bacteria were counted under a microscope. The use of chlorine dioxide showed no major changes in the IVOMD of hay and wheat. At the recommended concentration of 0.5 mg/l, the IVOMD relative to the control was 97,1 % for hay and 102,7 % for wheat. The number of rumen bacteria was not affected by the use of chlorine dioxide. Conversely, the use of peracetic acid led to a significant reduction in rumen fermentation. At the recommended concentration of 15-25 mg/l (dosed at 15 mg/l and 25 mg/l), the IVOMD relative to the control was 38,2 % and 38,4 % for hay and 50,4 % and 22,4 % for wheat. The number of rumen bacteria also decreased significantly. Chlorine dioxide seemed to have little to no disinfection effect on in vitro ruminal fermentation, however, the exact mechanisms could not be determined in the present study. This trial shows that disinfectants for permanent drinking water disinfection in cattle farming should be used with caution. In particular, disinfection agents containing peracetic acid may impair fermentation of rumen microbes. Further research is required to determine if the results of the present in vitro study are transferable to practice.

[饮用水永久消毒药剂对反刍动物瘤胃微生物发酵性能的影响]。
导言:优质的饮用水和充足的饮水量对保证牲畜的健康至关重要。各种因素可以导致水管中形成生物膜,作为许多不同病原体的储存库。添加消毒剂,如二氧化氯或过氧乙酸,已被证明可以改善永久饮用水的质量。迄今为止,这种方法主要用于猪和家禽的饲养,然而,越来越多地讨论将其用于畜牧业。由于饮用水中消毒剂对瘤胃发酵的影响尚不清楚,我们采用霍恩海姆饲料价值试验进行了消化率试验,以确定有机物的体外消化率(IVOMD)。研究了5种不同浓度的二氧化氯和过氧乙酸消毒剂对干草和小麦IVOMD的影响,并在显微镜下对瘤胃细菌进行了计数。二氧化氯的使用对干草和小麦的IVOMD没有太大的影响。在推荐浓度0.5 mg/l下,与对照相比,干草和小麦的IVOMD分别为97.1%和102.7%。二氧化氯的使用对瘤胃细菌数量没有影响。相反,过氧乙酸的使用导致瘤胃发酵显著降低。在推荐浓度为15 ~ 25 mg/l (15 mg/l和25 mg/l)时,相对于对照,干草的IVOMD分别为38.2%和38.4%,小麦的IVOMD分别为50.4%和22.4%。瘤胃细菌数量也显著减少。二氧化氯似乎对体外瘤胃发酵几乎没有消毒作用,但目前的研究还不能确定其确切的机制。本试验表明,应谨慎使用养牛场永久饮用水消毒消毒剂。特别是,含有过氧乙酸的消毒剂可能损害瘤胃微生物的发酵。需要进一步的研究来确定目前体外研究的结果是否可转移到实践中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Schweizer Archiv fur Tierheilkunde
Schweizer Archiv fur Tierheilkunde 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
46
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Das Schweizer Archiv für Tierheilkunde ist die älteste veterinärmedizinische Zeitschrift der Welt (gegründet 1816). Es ist das wissenschaftliche und praxisbezogene offizielle Publikationsorgan der Gesellschaft Schweizer Tierärztinnen und Tierärzte.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信