Whole-lesion histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient for the assessment of non-mass enhancement lesions on breast MRI

IF 1.1 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
N. Kunimatsu, A. Kunimatsu, Y. Uchida, I. Mori, Shigeru Kiryu
{"title":"Whole-lesion histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient for the assessment of non-mass enhancement lesions on breast MRI","authors":"N. Kunimatsu, A. Kunimatsu, Y. Uchida, I. Mori, Shigeru Kiryu","doi":"10.25259/JCIS_201_2021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives To investigate the application of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram analysis in differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions detected as non-mass enhancement on MRI. Materials and Methods A retrospective study was conducted for 25 malignant and 26 benign breast lesions showing non-mass enhancement on breast MRI. An experienced radiologist without prior knowledge of the pathological results drew a region of interest (ROI) outlining the periphery of each lesion on the ADC map. A histogram was then made for each lesion. Following a univariate analysis of 18 summary statistics values, we conducted statistical discrimination after hierarchical clustering using Ward’s method. A comparison between the malignant and the benign groups was made using multiple logistic regression analysis and the Mann-Whitney U test. A P -value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Univariate analysis for the 18 summary statistics values showed the malignant group had greater entropy (P < 0.001) and lower uniformity (P < 0.001). While there was no significant difference in mean and skewness values, the malignant group tended to show a lower mean (P = 0.090) and a higher skewness (P = 0.065). Hierarchical clustering of the 18 summary statistics values identified four values (10th percentile, entropy, skewness, and uniformity) of which the 10th percentile values were significantly lower for the malignant group (P = 0.035). Conclusions Whole-lesion ADC histogram analysis may be useful for differentiating malignant from benign lesions which show non-mass enhancement on breast MRI.","PeriodicalId":15512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Imaging Science","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Imaging Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_201_2021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives To investigate the application of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram analysis in differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions detected as non-mass enhancement on MRI. Materials and Methods A retrospective study was conducted for 25 malignant and 26 benign breast lesions showing non-mass enhancement on breast MRI. An experienced radiologist without prior knowledge of the pathological results drew a region of interest (ROI) outlining the periphery of each lesion on the ADC map. A histogram was then made for each lesion. Following a univariate analysis of 18 summary statistics values, we conducted statistical discrimination after hierarchical clustering using Ward’s method. A comparison between the malignant and the benign groups was made using multiple logistic regression analysis and the Mann-Whitney U test. A P -value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Univariate analysis for the 18 summary statistics values showed the malignant group had greater entropy (P < 0.001) and lower uniformity (P < 0.001). While there was no significant difference in mean and skewness values, the malignant group tended to show a lower mean (P = 0.090) and a higher skewness (P = 0.065). Hierarchical clustering of the 18 summary statistics values identified four values (10th percentile, entropy, skewness, and uniformity) of which the 10th percentile values were significantly lower for the malignant group (P = 0.035). Conclusions Whole-lesion ADC histogram analysis may be useful for differentiating malignant from benign lesions which show non-mass enhancement on breast MRI.
乳腺MRI非肿块增强病灶的视扩散系数全病变直方图分析
目的探讨表观扩散系数(ADC)直方图分析在乳腺MRI非肿块增强良恶性病变鉴别中的应用。材料与方法对乳腺MRI无肿块强化的乳腺恶性病变25例和良性病变26例进行回顾性分析。一位经验丰富的放射科医生在没有事先了解病理结果的情况下,在ADC图上绘制了一个兴趣区域(ROI),概述了每个病变的外围。然后绘制每个病变的直方图。在对18个汇总统计值进行单变量分析后,我们使用Ward 's方法进行分层聚类后的统计判别。恶性组与良性组比较采用多元logistic回归分析和Mann-Whitney U检验。P值小于0.05认为有统计学意义。结果18个汇总统计值的单因素分析显示,恶性组的熵值较大(P < 0.001),均匀性较低(P < 0.001)。平均值和偏度值差异无统计学意义,但恶性组的平均值较低(P = 0.090),偏度较高(P = 0.065)。对18个汇总统计值进行分层聚类,发现4个值(第10百分位、熵、偏度和均匀性),其中恶性组第10百分位值显著低于对照组(P = 0.035)。结论全病变ADC直方图分析可用于鉴别乳腺MRI非肿块强化病变的良恶性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Imaging Science
Journal of Clinical Imaging Science RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Imaging Science (JCIS) is an open access peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing high-quality articles in the field of Imaging Science. The journal aims to present Imaging Science and relevant clinical information in an understandable and useful format. The journal is owned and published by the Scientific Scholar. Audience Our audience includes Radiologists, Researchers, Clinicians, medical professionals and students. Review process JCIS has a highly rigorous peer-review process that makes sure that manuscripts are scientifically accurate, relevant, novel and important. Authors disclose all conflicts, affiliations and financial associations such that the published content is not biased.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信