Radical Hysterectomy With and Without Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Cervical Cancer Stage IB-IIB

Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.15296/ijwhr.2021.37
Parvin Mostafa Gharabaghi, Masumeh Bakhshandeh Saraskanrood, Manizheh Sayyahmelli, M. Jafari, Elahe Saheb Olad Madarek, Maryam Vaezi, V. Rahmani, A. Adili, Malahat Ebrahimpour, Atieh Amidfar, Maryam Pourbargi
{"title":"Radical Hysterectomy With and Without Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Cervical Cancer Stage IB-IIB","authors":"Parvin Mostafa Gharabaghi, Masumeh Bakhshandeh Saraskanrood, Manizheh Sayyahmelli, M. Jafari, Elahe Saheb Olad Madarek, Maryam Vaezi, V. Rahmani, A. Adili, Malahat Ebrahimpour, Atieh Amidfar, Maryam Pourbargi","doi":"10.15296/ijwhr.2021.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: In this study, radical hysterectomy, followed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) was compared with radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Material and Methods: This retrospective comparative observational study was performed on 13 patients with LACC International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB2-IIB who underwent a radical hysterectomy after NACT between March 2014 and November 2018. This group was compared with 18 patients undergoing radical hysterectomy with cervical cancer FIGO stage IIA-IB1 in the same period of time. Results: In the NACT group, 8 (61.5%) and 5 (38.4%) patients were in stages IIB and IB2, respectively, and 13 (72.2%) cases were in the IB1 stage in the non-NACT group. Post-operative blood transfusion in the NACT group was significantly higher compared to the non-NACT group [5 (38.4%) patients versus 0, P = 0.008]. The estimated blood loss (EBL) and operative time were similar between the groups. Finally, there were no significant differences in terms of intra-operative and other post-operative complications. Conclusions: Radical hysterectomy after NACT in women with LACC seems to be safe and reduces the need for radiation in patients with NACT who are at stage IIB. These results need to be confirmed in studies with a larger patient sample.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15296/ijwhr.2021.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: In this study, radical hysterectomy, followed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) was compared with radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Material and Methods: This retrospective comparative observational study was performed on 13 patients with LACC International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB2-IIB who underwent a radical hysterectomy after NACT between March 2014 and November 2018. This group was compared with 18 patients undergoing radical hysterectomy with cervical cancer FIGO stage IIA-IB1 in the same period of time. Results: In the NACT group, 8 (61.5%) and 5 (38.4%) patients were in stages IIB and IB2, respectively, and 13 (72.2%) cases were in the IB1 stage in the non-NACT group. Post-operative blood transfusion in the NACT group was significantly higher compared to the non-NACT group [5 (38.4%) patients versus 0, P = 0.008]. The estimated blood loss (EBL) and operative time were similar between the groups. Finally, there were no significant differences in terms of intra-operative and other post-operative complications. Conclusions: Radical hysterectomy after NACT in women with LACC seems to be safe and reduces the need for radiation in patients with NACT who are at stage IIB. These results need to be confirmed in studies with a larger patient sample.
分享
查看原文
IB-IIB期宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术伴与不伴新辅助化疗的疗效观察
目的:本研究比较局部晚期宫颈癌(LACC)患者根治性子宫切除术后新辅助化疗(NACT)与早期宫颈癌患者根治性子宫切除术的疗效。材料和方法:本回顾性比较观察研究对2014年3月至2018年11月期间13例国际妇产科学联合会(FIGO) IB2-IIB期LACC患者进行了NACT术后根治性子宫切除术。本组与同期18例FIGO期IIA-IB1宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术患者进行比较。结果:NACT组IIB期8例(61.5%),IB2期5例(38.4%),非NACT组IB1期13例(72.2%)。NACT组术后输血明显高于非NACT组[5例(38.4%)比0例,P = 0.008]。两组之间的估计失血量(EBL)和手术时间相似。最后,两组在术中及其他术后并发症方面无显著差异。结论:LACC女性NACT术后根治性子宫切除术似乎是安全的,并且减少了IIB期NACT患者对放疗的需求。这些结果需要在更大患者样本的研究中得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信