Dancing in concert? – aligning Broad-Based Black Economic Empowermentto (B-BBEE) sector strategies, structural transformation and growth

IF 0.3 Q3 AREA STUDIES
Ayabonga Cawe, Michael Sachs, I. Valodia
{"title":"Dancing in concert? – aligning Broad-Based Black Economic Empowermentto (B-BBEE) sector strategies, structural transformation and growth","authors":"Ayabonga Cawe, Michael Sachs, I. Valodia","doi":"10.1353/trn.2022.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article considers the history of the different eras of 'black empowerment' under different political-administrative frameworks. This allows insights to be drawn from the changes and continuities in policy, regulation and economic actions that account for the current successful and failed outcomes. Black empowerment has meant different things to different actors across these periods. Notwithstanding the implications of these different episodes in black empowerment, approaches that sought to mobilise black consumption and savings to achieve economic power, or to build institutions for mutual economic support remain an important interpretation of the empowerment project. In the democratic era, early approaches to B-BBEE were based on an implicit bargain between established capital and the black middle class and political elites, in return for macroeconomic stability, capital liberalisation and incremental, market-focused capital reform. Moreover a key concern has been how black empowerment can be reconciled with a coherent state-led antipoverty and developmental strategy that focuses on expanding economic participation by the black poor and the working class. Reframing B-BBEE requires consideration of the tools at our disposal–state owned entities, development finance institutions and industrial financing, employment equity, enterprise development and skills development legislation. These tools must be marshalled in the direction of new products, new market opportunities and industries. The paper considers some of the competition policy and regulatory design hurdles that need to be overcome to achieve these objectives and the policy and regulatory agenda for change, that can underpin this pursuit.","PeriodicalId":45045,"journal":{"name":"Transformation-Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transformation-Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/trn.2022.0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:This article considers the history of the different eras of 'black empowerment' under different political-administrative frameworks. This allows insights to be drawn from the changes and continuities in policy, regulation and economic actions that account for the current successful and failed outcomes. Black empowerment has meant different things to different actors across these periods. Notwithstanding the implications of these different episodes in black empowerment, approaches that sought to mobilise black consumption and savings to achieve economic power, or to build institutions for mutual economic support remain an important interpretation of the empowerment project. In the democratic era, early approaches to B-BBEE were based on an implicit bargain between established capital and the black middle class and political elites, in return for macroeconomic stability, capital liberalisation and incremental, market-focused capital reform. Moreover a key concern has been how black empowerment can be reconciled with a coherent state-led antipoverty and developmental strategy that focuses on expanding economic participation by the black poor and the working class. Reframing B-BBEE requires consideration of the tools at our disposal–state owned entities, development finance institutions and industrial financing, employment equity, enterprise development and skills development legislation. These tools must be marshalled in the direction of new products, new market opportunities and industries. The paper considers some of the competition policy and regulatory design hurdles that need to be overcome to achieve these objectives and the policy and regulatory agenda for change, that can underpin this pursuit.
在音乐会上跳舞?-将基础广泛的黑人经济赋权与行业战略、结构转型和增长相结合
摘要:本文考察了不同政治行政框架下不同时代的“黑人赋权”历史。这使得我们能够从政策、法规和经济行动的变化和连续性中获得见解,这些变化和连续性解释了当前成功和失败的结果。在这些时期,赋予黑人权力对不同的参与者意味着不同的东西。尽管这些不同的事件对黑人赋权产生了影响,但寻求动员黑人消费和储蓄以获得经济权力,或建立相互经济支持的机构的方法仍然是对赋权项目的重要解释。在民主时代,B-BBEE的早期方法是基于现有资本与黑人中产阶级和政治精英之间的隐性交易,以换取宏观经济稳定、资本自由化和渐进的、以市场为中心的资本改革。此外,一个关键的问题是如何将赋予黑人权力与连贯的国家主导的反贫困和发展战略相协调,该战略的重点是扩大黑人穷人和工人阶级的经济参与。重塑B-BBEE需要考虑我们可以使用的工具——国有实体、开发性金融机构和产业融资、就业公平、企业发展和技能发展立法。这些工具必须朝着新产品、新市场机会和新行业的方向进行调整。本文考虑了为实现这些目标需要克服的一些竞争政策和监管设计障碍,以及可以支持这一追求的政策和监管议程的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信