{"title":"Academia, Racial, and Social Justice, and Abrahamic Coexistence","authors":"Sa’ed Atshan","doi":"10.13169/reorient.7.2.0198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As I write this essay reflecting on Dr Atalia Omer’s brilliant, and deeply principled, Days of Awe: Reimagining Jewishness in Solidarity with Palestinians, a petition is circulating among academics that touches on issues at the heart of Omer’s book. Over 600 scholars of Jewish and/or Israeli Studies have now signed the petition in support of Dr Liora Halperin, Associate Professor of International Studies, History, and Jewish Studies at the University of Washington. This came after news broke that the University of Washington had stripped Halperin of her endowed Chair in Israel Studies, as a result of objections from a right-wing donor. This donor expressed disapproval of Halperin’s critiques of the Israeli state, and therefore pressed for the return of the five million dollars she had provided for the Chair. Fortunately, Halperin retains her tenured professorship, and will continue her outstanding research, teaching, and service. But her allies insist that the university must honor the commitment they made to her chair and the resources that came with it. This recent major controversy within the Jewish and Israel Studies worlds is merely the latest among a long history. Consider a different case from December 2020. The Forward (formerly known as the Jewish Daily Forward) reported on the standoff between Dr Marc Dollinger, Professor of Jewish Studies at San Francisco State University, and Brandeis University Press. After the murder of George Floyd earlier that year, Dollinger wrote an updated preface for his 2018 book, Black Power, Jewish Politics: Reinventing the Alliance in the 1960s. The preface included Dollinger’s statement on the increasing integration of white Jewish-American citizens in the United States and their consciousness of how that “reinforced elements of white supremacy in their own lived experience”. Brandeis University Press then received complaints about Dollinger’s words, and engaged the author so that he could edit the preface in order to print the new edition. He declined out of principle and the two parties decided to part ways, with Dollinger seeking a different publisher for his widely read book. While these cases are high-profile and visible, and many are not, Halperin and Dollinger’s experiences are nonetheless emblematic of the pressures that","PeriodicalId":36347,"journal":{"name":"ReOrient","volume":"121 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ReOrient","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13169/reorient.7.2.0198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As I write this essay reflecting on Dr Atalia Omer’s brilliant, and deeply principled, Days of Awe: Reimagining Jewishness in Solidarity with Palestinians, a petition is circulating among academics that touches on issues at the heart of Omer’s book. Over 600 scholars of Jewish and/or Israeli Studies have now signed the petition in support of Dr Liora Halperin, Associate Professor of International Studies, History, and Jewish Studies at the University of Washington. This came after news broke that the University of Washington had stripped Halperin of her endowed Chair in Israel Studies, as a result of objections from a right-wing donor. This donor expressed disapproval of Halperin’s critiques of the Israeli state, and therefore pressed for the return of the five million dollars she had provided for the Chair. Fortunately, Halperin retains her tenured professorship, and will continue her outstanding research, teaching, and service. But her allies insist that the university must honor the commitment they made to her chair and the resources that came with it. This recent major controversy within the Jewish and Israel Studies worlds is merely the latest among a long history. Consider a different case from December 2020. The Forward (formerly known as the Jewish Daily Forward) reported on the standoff between Dr Marc Dollinger, Professor of Jewish Studies at San Francisco State University, and Brandeis University Press. After the murder of George Floyd earlier that year, Dollinger wrote an updated preface for his 2018 book, Black Power, Jewish Politics: Reinventing the Alliance in the 1960s. The preface included Dollinger’s statement on the increasing integration of white Jewish-American citizens in the United States and their consciousness of how that “reinforced elements of white supremacy in their own lived experience”. Brandeis University Press then received complaints about Dollinger’s words, and engaged the author so that he could edit the preface in order to print the new edition. He declined out of principle and the two parties decided to part ways, with Dollinger seeking a different publisher for his widely read book. While these cases are high-profile and visible, and many are not, Halperin and Dollinger’s experiences are nonetheless emblematic of the pressures that
就在我撰写这篇文章,回顾阿塔利亚·奥默博士的著作《敬畏的日子:与巴勒斯坦人团结一致重新想象犹太人》时,学术界正在流传一份请愿书,涉及奥默书中的核心问题。600多名犹太和/或以色列研究学者现已签署了支持华盛顿大学国际研究、历史和犹太研究副教授Liora Halperin博士的请愿书。此前有消息称,由于一名右翼捐赠者的反对,华盛顿大学(University of Washington)剥夺了哈尔佩林在以色列研究领域的教授职位。这位捐助者表示不赞成哈尔佩林对以色列国家的批评,因此要求归还她提供给主席的500万美元。幸运的是,Halperin保留了她的终身教授职位,并将继续她杰出的研究、教学和服务。但她的盟友坚持认为,大学必须履行他们对她担任主席的承诺,以及随之而来的资源。最近在犹太人和以色列研究界的重大争论仅仅是漫长历史中最近的一次。考虑一下2020年12月的不同情况。《前进报》(前身为《犹太日报》)报道了旧金山州立大学犹太研究教授马克·多林格博士与布兰代斯大学出版社之间的对峙。那年早些时候,乔治·弗洛伊德(George Floyd)被谋杀后,多林格为他2018年出版的新书《黑人权力,犹太政治:重塑20世纪60年代的联盟》(Black Power, Jewish Politics: Reinventing the Alliance in 1960)写了更新的序言。这本书的序言包括多林格对美国白人犹太裔美国公民日益融合的陈述,以及他们意识到这如何“在他们自己的生活经历中加强了白人至上主义的因素”。布兰代斯大学出版社随后收到了对多林格文字的投诉,并聘请了作者,以便他可以编辑序言,以便印刷新版。他出于原则拒绝了,双方决定分道扬镳,多林格为他的广受欢迎的书寻找另一家出版商。尽管这些案例引人注目,引人注目,但许多案例并不引人注目,哈尔佩林和多林格的经历仍然象征着这种压力