Technological frames in classroom: a case study for a faculty professional development

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Merve Basdogan, Tracey Birdwell, Tripp Harris
{"title":"Technological frames in classroom: a case study for a faculty professional development","authors":"Merve Basdogan, Tracey Birdwell, Tripp Harris","doi":"10.25304/rlt.v30.2678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introducing new technologies to faculty members provides opportunities to reconstruct the ways they teach, evaluate, interact and communicate. Yet, the personal and organisational perceptions regarding the nature of technology can filter, frame and guide faculty’s interactions with technology. In this case study conducted in a faculty professional development context, we carried out a thematic analysis to explore the technological interpretations in the faculty’s definitions of technology. We analysed 32 definitions through Mitcham’s technological frames categories, and it was observed that faculty attached various meanings to technology in terms of (1) object, (2) knowledge, (3) activity and (4) volition perspectives. The role of self-interactions and social interactions in higher education has been discussed regarding the formation of technological understanding.","PeriodicalId":46691,"journal":{"name":"Research in Learning Technology","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Learning Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v30.2678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introducing new technologies to faculty members provides opportunities to reconstruct the ways they teach, evaluate, interact and communicate. Yet, the personal and organisational perceptions regarding the nature of technology can filter, frame and guide faculty’s interactions with technology. In this case study conducted in a faculty professional development context, we carried out a thematic analysis to explore the technological interpretations in the faculty’s definitions of technology. We analysed 32 definitions through Mitcham’s technological frames categories, and it was observed that faculty attached various meanings to technology in terms of (1) object, (2) knowledge, (3) activity and (4) volition perspectives. The role of self-interactions and social interactions in higher education has been discussed regarding the formation of technological understanding.
课堂技术框架:教师专业发展案例研究
向教师引入新技术提供了重建他们教学、评估、互动和沟通方式的机会。然而,个人和组织对技术本质的看法可以过滤、框架和指导教师与技术的互动。在这个以教师专业发展为背景的案例研究中,我们进行了专题分析,以探索教师对技术定义中的技术解释。我们通过Mitcham的技术框架类别分析了32个定义,并观察到教师从(1)对象、(2)知识、(3)活动和(4)意志的角度赋予技术不同的含义。从技术理解的形成角度探讨了自我互动和社会互动在高等教育中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research in Learning Technology
Research in Learning Technology EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信