Comparison of the Effectiveness of Dual Antiplatelet and Mono Antiplatelet as Non-Embolic Ischemic Stroke Therapy

IF 0.7 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Filipo David Tamara
{"title":"Comparison of the Effectiveness of Dual Antiplatelet and Mono Antiplatelet as Non-Embolic Ischemic Stroke Therapy","authors":"Filipo David Tamara","doi":"10.58860/ijsh.v2i7.70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stroke is a clinical syndrome of acute, focal neurological deficits associated with vascular injury of the central nervous system. Stroke is not a single disease but can be caused by various risk factors, processes, and disease mechanisms. Ischemic stroke is the most common stroke, about 80-90% of all strokes. Based on the 2018 Basic Health Research (Riskesdas) states that the prevalence of stroke that occurs in Indonesia is 10.9%, with the highest prevalence in the Riau Islands (12.9%) and the lowest in Papua (4.1%). This literature is written to compare the effectiveness of mono and dual antiplatelets as a non-embolic ischemic stroke therapy. The method in this study was a literature review that was searched using Pubmed, Google Scholar, Medline, Ebsco, Hindawi, Science Direct, and Cochrane, published in the last ten years. After obtaining the appropriate literature, the manuscript is written. Based on the results of the study, dual antiplatelet administration was more effective in preventing recurrent ischemic stroke and cardiovascular events in ischemic stroke patients when compared to mono antiplatelet. The recommended dual antiplatelet drugs are Clopidogrel and Aspirin. Based on the literature search, it can be concluded that dual antiplatelet administration is more effective in preventing recurrent ischemic stroke in stroke patients. However, some literature states that dual antiplatelet administration must still consider the potential increased risk of bleeding.","PeriodicalId":44967,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Migration Health and Social Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Migration Health and Social Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58860/ijsh.v2i7.70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stroke is a clinical syndrome of acute, focal neurological deficits associated with vascular injury of the central nervous system. Stroke is not a single disease but can be caused by various risk factors, processes, and disease mechanisms. Ischemic stroke is the most common stroke, about 80-90% of all strokes. Based on the 2018 Basic Health Research (Riskesdas) states that the prevalence of stroke that occurs in Indonesia is 10.9%, with the highest prevalence in the Riau Islands (12.9%) and the lowest in Papua (4.1%). This literature is written to compare the effectiveness of mono and dual antiplatelets as a non-embolic ischemic stroke therapy. The method in this study was a literature review that was searched using Pubmed, Google Scholar, Medline, Ebsco, Hindawi, Science Direct, and Cochrane, published in the last ten years. After obtaining the appropriate literature, the manuscript is written. Based on the results of the study, dual antiplatelet administration was more effective in preventing recurrent ischemic stroke and cardiovascular events in ischemic stroke patients when compared to mono antiplatelet. The recommended dual antiplatelet drugs are Clopidogrel and Aspirin. Based on the literature search, it can be concluded that dual antiplatelet administration is more effective in preventing recurrent ischemic stroke in stroke patients. However, some literature states that dual antiplatelet administration must still consider the potential increased risk of bleeding.
双抗血小板与单抗血小板在非栓塞性缺血性脑卒中治疗中的疗效比较
中风是一种与中枢神经系统血管损伤相关的急性局灶性神经功能缺损的临床综合征。中风不是一种单一的疾病,而是由各种危险因素、过程和疾病机制引起的。缺血性中风是最常见的中风,约占所有中风的80-90%。根据2018年基本健康研究(Riskesdas),印度尼西亚的中风患病率为10.9%,其中廖内群岛的患病率最高(12.9%),巴布亚最低(4.1%)。这篇文献是为了比较单抗和双抗血小板作为非栓塞性缺血性中风治疗的有效性。本研究的方法是通过检索Pubmed、Google Scholar、Medline、Ebsco、Hindawi、Science Direct和Cochrane等近十年发表的文献综述。在获得适当的文献资料后,撰写手稿。根据研究结果,与单一抗血小板相比,双重抗血小板治疗在预防缺血性卒中复发和心血管事件方面更有效。推荐的双重抗血小板药物是氯吡格雷和阿司匹林。通过文献检索,可以得出双重抗血小板给药在预防脑卒中患者再发缺血性脑卒中方面更为有效。然而,一些文献指出,双重抗血小板给药仍然必须考虑潜在的出血风险增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Migration Health and Social Care
International Journal of Migration Health and Social Care PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信