The combination of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and platelet to lymphocyte ratio improves accuracy of neonatal sepsis diagnosis

IF 0.2 Q4 PEDIATRICS
Rocky Wilar, Beatrice Koesmarsono, Stefanus Gunawan
{"title":"The combination of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and platelet to lymphocyte ratio improves accuracy of neonatal sepsis diagnosis","authors":"Rocky Wilar, Beatrice Koesmarsono, Stefanus Gunawan","doi":"10.14238/pi63.4.2023.213-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Neonatal sepsis remains a challenging issue, due to sophisticated and time consuming tests needed to confirm a diagnosis. \nObjective To assess the applicability of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as diagnostic markers in neonatal sepsis. \nMethods This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Neonatology Ward of Kandou General Hospital, Manado, North Sulawesi. Neonates with suspected sepsis were included by consecutive sampling. We measured NLR and PLR form hematology profiles and differential count. Diagnosis of neonatal sepsis was based on positive blood cultures. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was done to assess the NLR and PLR cut-off points. Chi-square test was used to analyze the diagnostic value of NLR and PLR. \nResults A total of 176 full term neonates with suspected sepsis were included in the study. Of these, 84 (47.7%) subjects were confirmed with neonatal sepsis and 92 (52.3%) were non-sepsis. The mean NLRs were 5.9 (95%CI 2.0 to 13.6) in the sepsis group and 1.6 (95%CI 0.2 to 3.2) in the non-sepsis group. A NLR of 3.0 was determined as the predictive cut-off value of neonatal sepsis (sensitivity 94%, speci?city 97.8%, and area under the ROC curve 0.995). NLR can effects on neonatal sepsis diagnosis by 61% . The mean PLRs were 79.9 (95%CI 44.0 to 155.8) in the sepsis group and 44.0 (95%CI 9.7 to 91.8) in the non-sepsis group. A PLR of 60.4 was determined as the predictive cut-off value of neonatal sepsis (sensitivity 86.9%, speci?city 87%, area under ROC curve 0.928). PLR can effects on neonatal sepsis diagnosis by 47.5%. When NLR and PLR were combined, they can improve accuracy of neonatal sepsis diagnosis about 72.2%. \nConclusion Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) can be used in combination as adjunct diagnostic tests for neonatal sepsis workups.","PeriodicalId":19660,"journal":{"name":"Paediatrica Indonesiana","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatrica Indonesiana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14238/pi63.4.2023.213-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Neonatal sepsis remains a challenging issue, due to sophisticated and time consuming tests needed to confirm a diagnosis. Objective To assess the applicability of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as diagnostic markers in neonatal sepsis. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Neonatology Ward of Kandou General Hospital, Manado, North Sulawesi. Neonates with suspected sepsis were included by consecutive sampling. We measured NLR and PLR form hematology profiles and differential count. Diagnosis of neonatal sepsis was based on positive blood cultures. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was done to assess the NLR and PLR cut-off points. Chi-square test was used to analyze the diagnostic value of NLR and PLR. Results A total of 176 full term neonates with suspected sepsis were included in the study. Of these, 84 (47.7%) subjects were confirmed with neonatal sepsis and 92 (52.3%) were non-sepsis. The mean NLRs were 5.9 (95%CI 2.0 to 13.6) in the sepsis group and 1.6 (95%CI 0.2 to 3.2) in the non-sepsis group. A NLR of 3.0 was determined as the predictive cut-off value of neonatal sepsis (sensitivity 94%, speci?city 97.8%, and area under the ROC curve 0.995). NLR can effects on neonatal sepsis diagnosis by 61% . The mean PLRs were 79.9 (95%CI 44.0 to 155.8) in the sepsis group and 44.0 (95%CI 9.7 to 91.8) in the non-sepsis group. A PLR of 60.4 was determined as the predictive cut-off value of neonatal sepsis (sensitivity 86.9%, speci?city 87%, area under ROC curve 0.928). PLR can effects on neonatal sepsis diagnosis by 47.5%. When NLR and PLR were combined, they can improve accuracy of neonatal sepsis diagnosis about 72.2%. Conclusion Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) can be used in combination as adjunct diagnostic tests for neonatal sepsis workups.
结合中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值和血小板与淋巴细胞比值可提高新生儿脓毒症的诊断准确性
背景新生儿败血症仍然是一个具有挑战性的问题,因为需要复杂和耗时的测试来确认诊断。目的探讨中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)作为新生儿脓毒症诊断指标的适用性。方法本横断面研究在北苏拉威西省万鸦老市坎杜总医院新生儿病房进行。对疑似脓毒症的新生儿进行连续抽样。我们通过血液学资料和鉴别计数测量NLR和PLR。新生儿败血症的诊断是基于阳性血培养。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析评估NLR和PLR的分界点。采用卡方检验分析NLR和PLR的诊断价值。结果本研究共纳入176例疑似脓毒症的足月新生儿。其中84例(47.7%)被确诊为新生儿脓毒症,92例(52.3%)未出现脓毒症。脓毒症组的平均nlr为5.9 (95%CI 2.0 ~ 13.6),非脓毒症组的平均nlr为1.6 (95%CI 0.2 ~ 3.2)。NLR为3.0作为新生儿脓毒症的预测临界值(敏感性为94%,特异性为0.05)。城市97.8%,ROC曲线下面积0.995)。NLR对新生儿败血症的诊断有61%的影响。脓毒症组的平均plr为79.9 (95%CI 44.0 ~ 155.8),非脓毒症组的平均plr为44.0 (95%CI 9.7 ~ 91.8)。PLR为60.4,为新生儿脓毒症的预测临界值(敏感性86.9%,特异性?城市87%,ROC曲线下面积0.928)。PLR对新生儿败血症诊断的影响率为47.5%。当NLR和PLR联合使用时,新生儿脓毒症的诊断准确率可提高72.2%。结论中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)可作为新生儿脓毒症检查的辅助诊断指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信