Lorena de la Fuente-Tomás, Belén Arranz, Pilar Sierra, Mónica Sánchez-Autet, Ana García-Blanco, Luis Gutiérrez-Rojas, Vicent Balanzá-Martínez, Sonia Vidal-Rubio, Eduard Vieta, Esther Jiménez, Carla Hernández, Manuel Arrojo, Jesús Gómez-Trigo, Yolanda Zapico-Merayo, Jose María Pelayo-Terán, Victor Pérez-Solà, Estanislao Mur, Narcís Cardoner, Ana González-Pinto, Iñaki Zorrilla, Miguel Ruiz-Veguilla, Ruben Catalán-Barragán, Gemma Safont, Clara Martínez-Cao, Pilar Sáiz, Julio Bobes, Maria Paz García-Portilla
{"title":"Spanish validation of the Empirically Developed Clinical Staging Model (EmDe-5) for patients with bipolar disorder.","authors":"Lorena de la Fuente-Tomás, Belén Arranz, Pilar Sierra, Mónica Sánchez-Autet, Ana García-Blanco, Luis Gutiérrez-Rojas, Vicent Balanzá-Martínez, Sonia Vidal-Rubio, Eduard Vieta, Esther Jiménez, Carla Hernández, Manuel Arrojo, Jesús Gómez-Trigo, Yolanda Zapico-Merayo, Jose María Pelayo-Terán, Victor Pérez-Solà, Estanislao Mur, Narcís Cardoner, Ana González-Pinto, Iñaki Zorrilla, Miguel Ruiz-Veguilla, Ruben Catalán-Barragán, Gemma Safont, Clara Martínez-Cao, Pilar Sáiz, Julio Bobes, Maria Paz García-Portilla","doi":"10.1016/j.rpsm.2021.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bipolar disorder (BD) has been reconceptualised as a progressive disorder that develops from mild to severe presentations. An empirical staging model - the Empirically Developed Clinical Staging Model for BD (EmDe-5) - was developed in a previous study. This study aims to further validate that model using a larger and more representative Spanish sample.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>183 BD outpatients were recruited at 11 sites in Spain. Assessment included clinical characteristics of the BD (number of hospitalisations, number of suicide attempts, comorbid personality disorders), physical health (BMI, metabolic syndrome, number of physical illnesses), cognition (SCIP), functioning (permanently disabled due to BD, FAST), and quality of life (SF-36). The CGI-S, VAS-S, and psychopharmacological treatment pattern were used as external validators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten patients (51.5%) were classified as stage 1, 33 (18%) as stage 2, 93 (508%) as stage 3, 37 (202%) as stage 4, and 10 (55%) as stage 5. All profilers, other than number of suicide attempts (p=0.311) and comorbid personality disorder (p=0.061), exhibited worse scores from stage 1 to 5. As expected, VAS-S and CGI-S scores were worse in the later stages. Regarding treatment, early stages (1-2) were associated with the use of one to three drugs while late stages (4-5) were associated with four or more drugs (p=0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We confirm the EmDe-5 staging model's construct validity. The ease of obtaining the profilers, together with the operational criteria provided to quantify them, will facilitate the use of the EmDe-5 staging model in daily clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":21406,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpsm.2021.09.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Bipolar disorder (BD) has been reconceptualised as a progressive disorder that develops from mild to severe presentations. An empirical staging model - the Empirically Developed Clinical Staging Model for BD (EmDe-5) - was developed in a previous study. This study aims to further validate that model using a larger and more representative Spanish sample.
Material and methods: 183 BD outpatients were recruited at 11 sites in Spain. Assessment included clinical characteristics of the BD (number of hospitalisations, number of suicide attempts, comorbid personality disorders), physical health (BMI, metabolic syndrome, number of physical illnesses), cognition (SCIP), functioning (permanently disabled due to BD, FAST), and quality of life (SF-36). The CGI-S, VAS-S, and psychopharmacological treatment pattern were used as external validators.
Results: Ten patients (51.5%) were classified as stage 1, 33 (18%) as stage 2, 93 (508%) as stage 3, 37 (202%) as stage 4, and 10 (55%) as stage 5. All profilers, other than number of suicide attempts (p=0.311) and comorbid personality disorder (p=0.061), exhibited worse scores from stage 1 to 5. As expected, VAS-S and CGI-S scores were worse in the later stages. Regarding treatment, early stages (1-2) were associated with the use of one to three drugs while late stages (4-5) were associated with four or more drugs (p=0.002).
Conclusions: We confirm the EmDe-5 staging model's construct validity. The ease of obtaining the profilers, together with the operational criteria provided to quantify them, will facilitate the use of the EmDe-5 staging model in daily clinical practice.