Spanish validation of the Empirically Developed Clinical Staging Model (EmDe-5) for patients with bipolar disorder.

Lorena de la Fuente-Tomás, Belén Arranz, Pilar Sierra, Mónica Sánchez-Autet, Ana García-Blanco, Luis Gutiérrez-Rojas, Vicent Balanzá-Martínez, Sonia Vidal-Rubio, Eduard Vieta, Esther Jiménez, Carla Hernández, Manuel Arrojo, Jesús Gómez-Trigo, Yolanda Zapico-Merayo, Jose María Pelayo-Terán, Victor Pérez-Solà, Estanislao Mur, Narcís Cardoner, Ana González-Pinto, Iñaki Zorrilla, Miguel Ruiz-Veguilla, Ruben Catalán-Barragán, Gemma Safont, Clara Martínez-Cao, Pilar Sáiz, Julio Bobes, Maria Paz García-Portilla
{"title":"Spanish validation of the Empirically Developed Clinical Staging Model (EmDe-5) for patients with bipolar disorder.","authors":"Lorena de la Fuente-Tomás, Belén Arranz, Pilar Sierra, Mónica Sánchez-Autet, Ana García-Blanco, Luis Gutiérrez-Rojas, Vicent Balanzá-Martínez, Sonia Vidal-Rubio, Eduard Vieta, Esther Jiménez, Carla Hernández, Manuel Arrojo, Jesús Gómez-Trigo, Yolanda Zapico-Merayo, Jose María Pelayo-Terán, Victor Pérez-Solà, Estanislao Mur, Narcís Cardoner, Ana González-Pinto, Iñaki Zorrilla, Miguel Ruiz-Veguilla, Ruben Catalán-Barragán, Gemma Safont, Clara Martínez-Cao, Pilar Sáiz, Julio Bobes, Maria Paz García-Portilla","doi":"10.1016/j.rpsm.2021.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bipolar disorder (BD) has been reconceptualised as a progressive disorder that develops from mild to severe presentations. An empirical staging model - the Empirically Developed Clinical Staging Model for BD (EmDe-5) - was developed in a previous study. This study aims to further validate that model using a larger and more representative Spanish sample.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>183 BD outpatients were recruited at 11 sites in Spain. Assessment included clinical characteristics of the BD (number of hospitalisations, number of suicide attempts, comorbid personality disorders), physical health (BMI, metabolic syndrome, number of physical illnesses), cognition (SCIP), functioning (permanently disabled due to BD, FAST), and quality of life (SF-36). The CGI-S, VAS-S, and psychopharmacological treatment pattern were used as external validators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten patients (51.5%) were classified as stage 1, 33 (18%) as stage 2, 93 (508%) as stage 3, 37 (202%) as stage 4, and 10 (55%) as stage 5. All profilers, other than number of suicide attempts (p=0.311) and comorbid personality disorder (p=0.061), exhibited worse scores from stage 1 to 5. As expected, VAS-S and CGI-S scores were worse in the later stages. Regarding treatment, early stages (1-2) were associated with the use of one to three drugs while late stages (4-5) were associated with four or more drugs (p=0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We confirm the EmDe-5 staging model's construct validity. The ease of obtaining the profilers, together with the operational criteria provided to quantify them, will facilitate the use of the EmDe-5 staging model in daily clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":21406,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpsm.2021.09.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Bipolar disorder (BD) has been reconceptualised as a progressive disorder that develops from mild to severe presentations. An empirical staging model - the Empirically Developed Clinical Staging Model for BD (EmDe-5) - was developed in a previous study. This study aims to further validate that model using a larger and more representative Spanish sample.

Material and methods: 183 BD outpatients were recruited at 11 sites in Spain. Assessment included clinical characteristics of the BD (number of hospitalisations, number of suicide attempts, comorbid personality disorders), physical health (BMI, metabolic syndrome, number of physical illnesses), cognition (SCIP), functioning (permanently disabled due to BD, FAST), and quality of life (SF-36). The CGI-S, VAS-S, and psychopharmacological treatment pattern were used as external validators.

Results: Ten patients (51.5%) were classified as stage 1, 33 (18%) as stage 2, 93 (508%) as stage 3, 37 (202%) as stage 4, and 10 (55%) as stage 5. All profilers, other than number of suicide attempts (p=0.311) and comorbid personality disorder (p=0.061), exhibited worse scores from stage 1 to 5. As expected, VAS-S and CGI-S scores were worse in the later stages. Regarding treatment, early stages (1-2) were associated with the use of one to three drugs while late stages (4-5) were associated with four or more drugs (p=0.002).

Conclusions: We confirm the EmDe-5 staging model's construct validity. The ease of obtaining the profilers, together with the operational criteria provided to quantify them, will facilitate the use of the EmDe-5 staging model in daily clinical practice.

西班牙对双相情感障碍患者经验开发的临床分期模型(EmDe-5)的验证。
双相情感障碍(BD)已经被重新定义为一种从轻度到重度的进行性疾病。经验分期模型-经验开发的BD临床分期模型(EmDe-5) -在之前的研究中被开发出来。本研究旨在使用更大更有代表性的西班牙样本进一步验证该模型。材料和方法:在西班牙11个地点招募183名BD门诊患者。评估包括双相障碍的临床特征(住院次数、自杀企图次数、共病人格障碍)、身体健康(BMI、代谢综合征、身体疾病数量)、认知(SCIP)、功能(因双相障碍永久残疾、FAST)和生活质量(SF-36)。采用CGI-S、VAS-S和精神药理学治疗模式作为外部验证器。结果:1期10例(51.5%),2期33例(18%),3期93例(508%),4期37例(202%),5期10例(55%)。除自杀企图数(p=0.311)和共病人格障碍(p=0.061)外,所有分析者在第一至第五阶段的得分都较差。正如预期的那样,VAS-S和CGI-S评分在后期较差。关于治疗,早期(1-2)与使用一到三种药物相关,而晚期(4-5)与使用四种或更多种药物相关(p=0.002)。结论:我们证实了EmDe-5分期模型的结构效度。易于获得的分析器,连同提供的操作标准来量化它们,将有助于在日常临床实践中使用EmDe-5分期模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信