H. Momeni, A. Kerami, L. Mirshekari, Z. Shahsavari, Z. Shokhmgar, A. Sanagoo, A. Salehi
{"title":"Comparing the Efficacy of Portfolio and Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) Model, on Nursing Students Disposition Toward Critical Thinking","authors":"H. Momeni, A. Kerami, L. Mirshekari, Z. Shahsavari, Z. Shokhmgar, A. Sanagoo, A. Salehi","doi":"10.52547/rme.13.2.47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"©2021 Guilan University of Medical Sciences ABSTACT Introduction: Given the importance of nursing education and evaluation and the need to make correct decisions in critical situations by students also to promote critical thinking in nursing students, researcher decided to assess efficacy of clinical evaluation by two methods of direct observation of procedural skills and portfolio on critical thinking of students. Methods: in this interventional study 32 Students of the 5 th semester of the Bachelor of Nursing, Khomein College of Nursing which divided into two groups with pretest & posttest participated in 2013. At the beginning, critical thinking disposition questionnaire ( CTDI) was completed by students. Then, Class was divided into two groups randomly. In each group, one of the evaluation methods containing Portfolio and Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) was executed. At last critical thinking disposition questionnaire again was completed and results were evaluated. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics and independent ttest through SPSS. Results: The results showed that the total score of tendency to critical thinking in the portfolio group was as follow: before the evaluation method (240.97±21.25) and after the evaluation method (266.50±21/32),also, in the direct observation skill group before evaluation (242/17±20/85) and after evaluation was (248/17±18/24). There are","PeriodicalId":75518,"journal":{"name":"Annual Conference on Research in Medical Education. Conference on Research in Medical Education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Conference on Research in Medical Education. Conference on Research in Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/rme.13.2.47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
程序技能组合与直接观察(DOPS)模式对护生批判性思维倾向的影响
摘要简介:鉴于护理教育与评估的重要性,以及学生在危急情况下做出正确决策对促进护生批判性思维的重要性,研究者决定通过直接观察程序技能和作品集两种方法来评估临床评估对学生批判性思维的效果。方法:2013年霍梅因护理学院护理学学士第五学期32名学生参与介入研究,分为前测和后测两组。首先,学生完成批判性思维倾向问卷(CTDI)。然后,将班级随机分为两组。在每一组中,采用组合评估法和程序技能直接观察法(DOPS)进行评估。最后再次填写批判性思维倾向问卷并对结果进行评价。数据分析采用描述性统计和SPSS独立检验。结果:结果显示,组合组批判性思维倾向总分分别为:评价方法前(240.97±21.25)分、评价方法后(266.50±21/32)分;直接观察技能组评价方法前(242/17±20/85)分、评价方法后(248/17±18/24)分。有
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。