Comparison of the Satisfaction of Students who Use Different Learning Management Systems in Distance Education Processes

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Erdi Okan Yılmaz
{"title":"Comparison of the Satisfaction of Students who Use Different Learning Management Systems in Distance Education Processes","authors":"Erdi Okan Yılmaz","doi":"10.55982/openpraxis.14.2.152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to compare the distance education process and system-related satisfaction of students using different learning management systems (Moodle, Google Classroom). Research samples of this mixed explanatory design comprise a total of 7318 students enrolled in U ş ak University for the 2020–2021 academic year. The sample categories include 3294 students using Moodle and 3332 utilizing Classroom system besides the 692 students who experienced both environments. Research data were collected by a questionnaire, semi-structured interview form and system log records. At the end of the six-week application process, a distance education process satisfaction questionnaire was applied to the students with the experience in both education software and their opinions were obtained. The results regarding the sample including students with experience on both software tools indicate the students using Classroom have higher satisfaction levels in the distance education process in system infrastructure, online lecture system, assessment, and evaluation dimensions than the ones using Moodle. The qualitative data collected from the interview form hints at problems the students experienced in the synchronous-asynchronous, test and assessment systems of the Moodle system which reduced their satisfaction.","PeriodicalId":45611,"journal":{"name":"Open Praxis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.14.2.152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study aims to compare the distance education process and system-related satisfaction of students using different learning management systems (Moodle, Google Classroom). Research samples of this mixed explanatory design comprise a total of 7318 students enrolled in U ş ak University for the 2020–2021 academic year. The sample categories include 3294 students using Moodle and 3332 utilizing Classroom system besides the 692 students who experienced both environments. Research data were collected by a questionnaire, semi-structured interview form and system log records. At the end of the six-week application process, a distance education process satisfaction questionnaire was applied to the students with the experience in both education software and their opinions were obtained. The results regarding the sample including students with experience on both software tools indicate the students using Classroom have higher satisfaction levels in the distance education process in system infrastructure, online lecture system, assessment, and evaluation dimensions than the ones using Moodle. The qualitative data collected from the interview form hints at problems the students experienced in the synchronous-asynchronous, test and assessment systems of the Moodle system which reduced their satisfaction.
使用不同学习管理系统的学生在远程教育过程中的满意度比较
本研究旨在比较使用不同学习管理系统(Moodle、Google Classroom)的学生的远程教育过程及系统相关满意度。这种混合解释设计的研究样本包括2020-2021学年在乌伊萨克大学入学的7318名学生。样本类别包括使用Moodle的3294名学生和使用Classroom系统的3332名学生,以及体验这两种环境的692名学生。研究数据采用问卷调查、半结构化访谈和系统日志记录等方式收集。在为期六周的申请过程结束时,对使用这两种教育软件的学生进行了远程教育过程满意度问卷调查,并获得了他们的意见。对使用这两种软件工具的学生样本的结果表明,使用Classroom的学生在系统基础设施、在线讲座系统、评估和评估维度上比使用Moodle的学生在远程教育过程中有更高的满意度。从访谈表格中收集的定性数据暗示了学生在Moodle系统的同步-异步,测试和评估系统中遇到的问题,降低了他们的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Praxis
Open Praxis EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信