Opioid Prescription in Switzerland: Appropriate Comedication use in Cancer and Noncancer Pain

M. Wertli
{"title":"Opioid Prescription in Switzerland: Appropriate\nComedication use in Cancer and Noncancer\nPain","authors":"M. Wertli","doi":"10.36076/ppj/2019.22.537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In Europe, limited information on the use of opioids is available.\nObjectives: To assess how guideline recommendations to manage opioid-related adverse\nevents were followed in cancer- and noncancer-related opioid use.\nStudy Design: Analysis of health insurance data of one of the major health insurers in\nSwitzerland.\nSetting: All opioid claims between 2006 and 2014.\nMethods: Opioid episodes were cancer-related when cancer treatments were used within ±\n3 months of the first opioid claim. Recurrent strong episodes were defined as ≥ 2 opioid claims\nwith at least one strong opioid claim. Episode duration were acute (< 90 days), subacute, or\nchronic (≥ 120 days/≥ 90 days + ≥ 10 claims).\nResults: Out of 591,633 opioid episodes 76,968 (13%) were recurrent episodes: 94%\nwere noncancer related (83% in recurrent episodes) and 6% cancer related (17% recurrent).\nChronic opioid use was observed in 55% (noncancer) and 58% (cancer) recurrent episodes.\nRecommended laxatives were used in 50% noncancer and in 67% cancer episodes. Antiemetic\ndrugs were used in 54% noncancer and in 83% cancer episodes. Not recommended\ncoprescription of benzodiazepines was observed in 34% recurrent noncancer and 46% cancer\nepisodes.\nLimitations: No clinical information was available to assess the indication for opioid use.\nConclusions: In this study, opioids were primarily used outside the context of cancer-related\ntreatment. In noncancer-related opioid use, we found a substantial higher proportion without\nrecommended laxative and antiemetic medications. Coprescription of benzodiazepines may\nincrease the risk for opioid overdose and was present in one-third of the noncancer episodes\nand in almost every second cancer episode.\nKey words: Pain medications, opioids, nonopioids, benzodiazepines, health insurance claims\ndata, cancer pain, noncancer pain, chronic opioid use, adverse events prevention, guideline\nrecommendations","PeriodicalId":11328,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, November 14, 2019","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, November 14, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36076/ppj/2019.22.537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: In Europe, limited information on the use of opioids is available. Objectives: To assess how guideline recommendations to manage opioid-related adverse events were followed in cancer- and noncancer-related opioid use. Study Design: Analysis of health insurance data of one of the major health insurers in Switzerland. Setting: All opioid claims between 2006 and 2014. Methods: Opioid episodes were cancer-related when cancer treatments were used within ± 3 months of the first opioid claim. Recurrent strong episodes were defined as ≥ 2 opioid claims with at least one strong opioid claim. Episode duration were acute (< 90 days), subacute, or chronic (≥ 120 days/≥ 90 days + ≥ 10 claims). Results: Out of 591,633 opioid episodes 76,968 (13%) were recurrent episodes: 94% were noncancer related (83% in recurrent episodes) and 6% cancer related (17% recurrent). Chronic opioid use was observed in 55% (noncancer) and 58% (cancer) recurrent episodes. Recommended laxatives were used in 50% noncancer and in 67% cancer episodes. Antiemetic drugs were used in 54% noncancer and in 83% cancer episodes. Not recommended coprescription of benzodiazepines was observed in 34% recurrent noncancer and 46% cancer episodes. Limitations: No clinical information was available to assess the indication for opioid use. Conclusions: In this study, opioids were primarily used outside the context of cancer-related treatment. In noncancer-related opioid use, we found a substantial higher proportion without recommended laxative and antiemetic medications. Coprescription of benzodiazepines may increase the risk for opioid overdose and was present in one-third of the noncancer episodes and in almost every second cancer episode. Key words: Pain medications, opioids, nonopioids, benzodiazepines, health insurance claims data, cancer pain, noncancer pain, chronic opioid use, adverse events prevention, guideline recommendations
瑞士的阿片类药物处方:癌症和非癌症疼痛的适当用药
背景:在欧洲,关于阿片类药物使用的信息有限。目的:评估在癌症和非癌症相关阿片类药物使用中如何遵循指南建议来管理阿片类药物相关不良事件。研究设计:分析瑞士一家主要医疗保险公司的医疗保险数据。背景:2006年至2014年间所有阿片类药物索赔。方法:当在第一次阿片类药物申请后±3个月内使用癌症治疗时,阿片类药物发作与癌症相关。复发性强发作定义为≥2次阿片类药物索赔,至少1次强烈阿片类药物索赔。发作持续时间为急性(< 90天)、亚急性或慢性(≥120天/≥90天+≥10次索赔)。结果:在591,633次阿片类药物发作中,76,968次(13%)为复发发作:94%与癌症无关(复发发作83%),6%与癌症相关(复发17%)。慢性阿片类药物使用在55%(非癌症)和58%(癌症)复发发作中被观察到。50%的非癌症患者和67%的癌症患者使用了推荐的泻药。54%的非癌症患者使用止吐药,83%的癌症患者使用止吐药。不推荐苯二氮卓类药物在34%的复发的非癌症和46%的癌症发作中被观察到。局限性:没有可用的临床信息来评估阿片类药物使用的指征。结论:在这项研究中,阿片类药物主要用于癌症相关治疗之外。在非癌症相关的阿片类药物使用中,我们发现没有推荐的泻药和止吐药物的比例要高得多。苯二氮卓类药物的共同处方可能会增加阿片类药物过量的风险,并且在三分之一的非癌症发作和几乎每秒钟的癌症发作中存在。关键词:止痛药,阿片类药物,非阿片类药物,苯二氮卓类药物,健康保险索赔数据,癌症疼痛,非癌症疼痛,慢性阿片类药物使用,不良事件预防,指南建议
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信