The Effectiveness of Problem-Based Learning in Undergraduate Nursing Programs: A Scoping Review of the Literature

Jie-Li Li, R. Jayasekara, Ying Zhang
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Problem-Based Learning in Undergraduate Nursing Programs:\nA Scoping Review of the Literature","authors":"Jie-Li Li, R. Jayasekara, Ying Zhang","doi":"10.33140/jnh.04.01.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Problem-based learning (PBL) working as an innovative student-centered teaching method has been tested for its effectiveness among considerable primary studies. While there is still lacking firm evidence in the nursing educational field about its efficacy. The different paper reports different research result about an application of PBL methodology. Objectives: The purpose of this scoping review was to appraise and examine the range of recent available evidence on the effectiveness of problem-based learning in undergraduate nursing programs. Research Strategy: Used Medline, The Cochrane Databases of Systematic Review, and The Database of Abstract of Reviews of Effect (DARE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL (via Ebsco)) to search English language literature. Adopted P (population) C (concept) C (context) framework to identify keywords and index terms, and the reference list of some high level of evidence was lastly searched for additional studies. Methodological quality: Each paper was assessed for its eligibility and methodological quality with JBI Critical Appraisal tools (Appendix 1) before inclusion in this review. The level of evidence of each retrieved study was assessed according to New JBI Levels of Evidence (Appendix2) developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute Levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendation Working Party October 2013. High level of evidence such as systematic reviews, randomised control trials, quasi-experimental studies were given priority. Discussion: Considerable primary studies have reported PBL produced a positive outcome for nursing students, while none of them gave firm evidence about the effect of PBL on nursing students’ critical thinking development, knowledge competence, learning motivation, attitude, and performance. Critical thinking, as the vital evaluation element of each study, whether relates positively to the other skills was uncertain. The validity and reliability of evaluation instruments in each study in nursing discipline were still controversial. Conclusion: No strong conclusion had been made from this review, and more research with large sample size is needed to examine the effectiveness of PBL among nursing programs. Long-term effects of outcomes and cost effectiveness were suggested to be measured in future studies. The effectiveness’ appraisal instruments in nursing discipline were called for adjustment and development.","PeriodicalId":89422,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing and healthcare of chronic illness","volume":"196 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nursing and healthcare of chronic illness","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/jnh.04.01.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Problem-based learning (PBL) working as an innovative student-centered teaching method has been tested for its effectiveness among considerable primary studies. While there is still lacking firm evidence in the nursing educational field about its efficacy. The different paper reports different research result about an application of PBL methodology. Objectives: The purpose of this scoping review was to appraise and examine the range of recent available evidence on the effectiveness of problem-based learning in undergraduate nursing programs. Research Strategy: Used Medline, The Cochrane Databases of Systematic Review, and The Database of Abstract of Reviews of Effect (DARE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL (via Ebsco)) to search English language literature. Adopted P (population) C (concept) C (context) framework to identify keywords and index terms, and the reference list of some high level of evidence was lastly searched for additional studies. Methodological quality: Each paper was assessed for its eligibility and methodological quality with JBI Critical Appraisal tools (Appendix 1) before inclusion in this review. The level of evidence of each retrieved study was assessed according to New JBI Levels of Evidence (Appendix2) developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute Levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendation Working Party October 2013. High level of evidence such as systematic reviews, randomised control trials, quasi-experimental studies were given priority. Discussion: Considerable primary studies have reported PBL produced a positive outcome for nursing students, while none of them gave firm evidence about the effect of PBL on nursing students’ critical thinking development, knowledge competence, learning motivation, attitude, and performance. Critical thinking, as the vital evaluation element of each study, whether relates positively to the other skills was uncertain. The validity and reliability of evaluation instruments in each study in nursing discipline were still controversial. Conclusion: No strong conclusion had been made from this review, and more research with large sample size is needed to examine the effectiveness of PBL among nursing programs. Long-term effects of outcomes and cost effectiveness were suggested to be measured in future studies. The effectiveness’ appraisal instruments in nursing discipline were called for adjustment and development.
基于问题的学习在本科护理课程中的有效性:文献综述
基于问题的学习(PBL)作为一种创新的以学生为中心的教学方法,其有效性在大量的初步研究中得到了检验。但在护理教育领域,其有效性仍缺乏确凿的证据。不同的论文报道了不同的PBL方法应用的研究结果。目的:本综述的目的是评估和检查最近可获得的关于本科护理课程中基于问题的学习有效性的证据范围。研究策略:使用Medline、Cochrane系统评价数据库、效果评价摘要数据库(DARE)、护理及相关健康文献累积索引(CINAHL(通过Ebsco))检索英文文献。采用P (population) C (concept) C (context)框架识别关键词和索引项,最后检索一些高水平证据的参考文献列表,进行补充研究。方法学质量:每篇论文在纳入本综述之前,均使用JBI关键评估工具(附录1)评估其合格性和方法学质量。根据乔安娜布里格斯研究所证据水平和推荐等级工作组2013年10月制定的新jbiles证据水平(附录2)评估每个检索研究的证据水平。优先考虑高水平的证据,如系统评价、随机对照试验、准实验研究。讨论:大量的初步研究报道了PBL对护生产生了积极的结果,但没有一项研究给出了PBL对护生批判性思维发展、知识能力、学习动机、态度和表现的影响的确凿证据。批判性思维作为每项研究的重要评估要素,是否与其他技能呈正相关尚不确定。各护理学科研究中评估工具的效度和信度仍存在争议。结论:本综述未得出强有力的结论,需要更多大样本的研究来检验PBL在护理项目中的有效性。结果的长期影响和成本效益建议在未来的研究中加以衡量。护理学科的有效性评价手段有待调整和发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信