Evaluation of nurse- and anaesthetist-led sedation for selected transcatheter aortic valve implantation procedures

Suzy Browne, David Smith, Daniel Adams, Sumesh Thiruthalil, A. Pottle, M. Bowers, I. McGovern, S. Mattison, Robert D. Smith, V. Panoulas, T. Kabir, Simson Davies, J. Shannon, E. Heng, H. Rahbi, N. Chandra, N. Patel, W. Banya, Utam Seehra, A. Tindale, R. Lane, T. Luescher, M. Dalby
{"title":"Evaluation of nurse- and anaesthetist-led sedation for selected transcatheter aortic valve implantation procedures","authors":"Suzy Browne, David Smith, Daniel Adams, Sumesh Thiruthalil, A. Pottle, M. Bowers, I. McGovern, S. Mattison, Robert D. Smith, V. Panoulas, T. Kabir, Simson Davies, J. Shannon, E. Heng, H. Rahbi, N. Chandra, N. Patel, W. Banya, Utam Seehra, A. Tindale, R. Lane, T. Luescher, M. Dalby","doi":"10.12968/bjca.2022.0089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most transcatheter aortic valve implantation procedures are now performed under conscious sedation, rather than general anaesthetic. This study evaluated nurse-led conscious sedation, compared with anaesthetist-led sedation, to determine the feasibility of the former. Consecutive patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation under either nurse-led or anaesthetist-led sedation between July 2018 and September 2021 were reviewed. Assessed outcomes were analysed and compared, including 30-day mortality rate, major vascular access site bleeding, moderate or severe aortic regurgitation, stroke, new pacemaker implantation, duration of procedure and length of stay. A total of 212 patients who underwent nurse-led sedation and 412 who underwent anaesthetist-led sedation were identified. There were no significant differences in risk scores between the two groups. In both groups, incidence of conversion to general anaesthetic was low, with nurse sedatitionists seeking anaesthetist support in 13 (6.2%) cases. Cases with nurse-led sedation had a significantly lower average duration of the procedure (90 minutes vs 111 minutes; P=0.001) and length of stay (2 days vs 3 days, P=0.0002). Nurse-led sedation can be safely incorporated into transcatheter aortic valve implantation practice. Nurse-led sedation delivered similar outcomes to anaesthetist-led sedation, but with shorter procedural times and legnth of stay. This could allow more flexible scheduling, increased capacity and improved access for patients.","PeriodicalId":72463,"journal":{"name":"British journal of cardiac nursing","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of cardiac nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjca.2022.0089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most transcatheter aortic valve implantation procedures are now performed under conscious sedation, rather than general anaesthetic. This study evaluated nurse-led conscious sedation, compared with anaesthetist-led sedation, to determine the feasibility of the former. Consecutive patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation under either nurse-led or anaesthetist-led sedation between July 2018 and September 2021 were reviewed. Assessed outcomes were analysed and compared, including 30-day mortality rate, major vascular access site bleeding, moderate or severe aortic regurgitation, stroke, new pacemaker implantation, duration of procedure and length of stay. A total of 212 patients who underwent nurse-led sedation and 412 who underwent anaesthetist-led sedation were identified. There were no significant differences in risk scores between the two groups. In both groups, incidence of conversion to general anaesthetic was low, with nurse sedatitionists seeking anaesthetist support in 13 (6.2%) cases. Cases with nurse-led sedation had a significantly lower average duration of the procedure (90 minutes vs 111 minutes; P=0.001) and length of stay (2 days vs 3 days, P=0.0002). Nurse-led sedation can be safely incorporated into transcatheter aortic valve implantation practice. Nurse-led sedation delivered similar outcomes to anaesthetist-led sedation, but with shorter procedural times and legnth of stay. This could allow more flexible scheduling, increased capacity and improved access for patients.
经导管主动脉瓣植入术中护士和麻醉师主导镇静的评价
现在大多数经导管主动脉瓣植入术是在清醒镇静下进行的,而不是全身麻醉。本研究评估了护士主导的清醒镇静,并与麻醉师主导的镇静进行了比较,以确定前者的可行性。回顾2018年7月至2021年9月期间在护士主导或麻醉师主导镇静下连续接受经导管主动脉瓣置入术的患者。对评估结果进行分析和比较,包括30天死亡率、主要血管通路出血、中度或重度主动脉瓣反流、中风、新起搏器植入、手术时间和住院时间。共有212名患者接受护士主导的镇静治疗,412名患者接受麻醉师主导的镇静治疗。两组之间的风险评分没有显著差异。两组转为全麻的发生率均较低,镇静护士在13例(6.2%)病例中寻求麻醉师支持。在护士引导下镇静的病例中,平均持续时间明显较短(90分钟vs 111分钟;P=0.001)和停留时间(2天vs 3天,P=0.0002)。在经导管主动脉瓣植入术中,护士引导的镇静可以安全地纳入。护士主导的镇静与麻醉师主导的镇静效果相似,但手术时间和住院时间更短。这将允许更灵活的日程安排,增加容量并改善患者的访问。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信