Pre-service Teachers’ Use and Usefulness of Blackboard Learning Management Systems for Self-Regulated Learning

IF 1.2 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Israel Kibirige, R. J. Odora
{"title":"Pre-service Teachers’ Use and Usefulness of Blackboard Learning Management Systems for Self-Regulated Learning","authors":"Israel Kibirige, R. J. Odora","doi":"10.23887/jet.v7i2.52194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although BLB has many applications students use, it is not clear which applications are used most and perceived most useful for Self-Regulated Learning (SRL). The objective of this research is to establish applications pre-service teachers use most and perceive as most useful for SRL. The study used a cross-sectional survey design with 120 technology education undergraduate pre-service teachers. A questionnaire was distributed during the Technology Education period and collected after 45 minutes. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) determined the most BLB applications and their perceived usefulness, while a t-test examined male and female differences in the use and usefulness of BLB applications for SRL. Both tests were done using SPSS version 22. The major result shows half of all BLB applications perceived as useful were the ones used most and had positive associations. Three out of eight accounted for 95.69% of the use, while four applications accounted for 73.33% variances in usefulness. Component loadings 1-3 for BLB use variance were: subject content 80.9%, assessment 11.2%, and 3.55%, while usefulness components 1-4 variance were: subject content 26.7%, assessment 17.9%, class task 16.1%, and grade centre 12.6%. There were differences between gender in the use and usefulness of BLB applications, with males taking the lead in both. Thus, this study extends the debate on the gender gap in technology use in higher education.","PeriodicalId":46468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Special Education Technology","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Special Education Technology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v7i2.52194","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Although BLB has many applications students use, it is not clear which applications are used most and perceived most useful for Self-Regulated Learning (SRL). The objective of this research is to establish applications pre-service teachers use most and perceive as most useful for SRL. The study used a cross-sectional survey design with 120 technology education undergraduate pre-service teachers. A questionnaire was distributed during the Technology Education period and collected after 45 minutes. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) determined the most BLB applications and their perceived usefulness, while a t-test examined male and female differences in the use and usefulness of BLB applications for SRL. Both tests were done using SPSS version 22. The major result shows half of all BLB applications perceived as useful were the ones used most and had positive associations. Three out of eight accounted for 95.69% of the use, while four applications accounted for 73.33% variances in usefulness. Component loadings 1-3 for BLB use variance were: subject content 80.9%, assessment 11.2%, and 3.55%, while usefulness components 1-4 variance were: subject content 26.7%, assessment 17.9%, class task 16.1%, and grade centre 12.6%. There were differences between gender in the use and usefulness of BLB applications, with males taking the lead in both. Thus, this study extends the debate on the gender gap in technology use in higher education.
职前教师对黑板学习管理系统在自主学习中的使用及实用性
虽然学生们使用语言学习有许多应用程序,但目前尚不清楚哪些应用程序对自我调节学习(SRL)使用最多,被认为最有用。本研究的目的是建立职前教师最常使用和认为对SRL最有用的应用程序。本研究采用横断面调查设计对120名技术教育本科职前教师进行调查。在技术教育期间分发调查表,并在45分钟后收集。主成分分析(PCA)确定了大多数BLB应用及其感知有用性,而t检验检验了男性和女性在SRL使用BLB应用和有用性方面的差异。两项测试均使用SPSS版本22进行。主要结果显示,在所有被认为有用的BLB应用程序中,有一半是使用最多的,并且具有积极的关联。8个应用程序中有3个占使用的95.69%,而4个应用程序占有用性差异的73.33%。BLB使用方差的成分负荷1-3分别为:科目内容80.9%,评估11.2%和3.55%;有用性成分1-4方差为:科目内容26.7%,评估17.9%,课堂任务16.1%,年级中心12.6%。在BLB应用程序的使用和有用性方面存在性别差异,男性在这两方面都处于领先地位。因此,本研究扩展了关于高等教育中技术使用的性别差异的争论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.80%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信