Human rabies postexposure prophylaxis and rabid terrestrial animals in Ontario, Canada: 2014-2016.

D. Middleton, L. Friedman, S. Johnson, S. Buchan, B. Warshawsky
{"title":"Human rabies postexposure prophylaxis and rabid terrestrial animals in Ontario, Canada: 2014-2016.","authors":"D. Middleton, L. Friedman, S. Johnson, S. Buchan, B. Warshawsky","doi":"10.14745/CCDR.V45I78A02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nThe number of rabid terrestrial animals in Ontario has decreased markedly since the 1970s and 1980s. However, the number of recommended rabies postexposure prophylaxis (RPEP) courses has not decreased proportionally. The decision to recommend RPEP for terrestrial animal exposures should be based on a risk assessment that considers the prevalence of rabies in these animals within a jurisdiction, among other factors.\n\n\nObjective\nTo explore trends in RPEP recommendations for exposures to terrestrial animals in Ontario in relation to the recency of terrestrial animal rabies cases by public health unit (PHU) jurisdiction.\n\n\nMethods\nRPEP recommendation data for the 36 Ontario PHUs were obtained from the Ontario integrated Public Health Information System and animal rabies data by PHU were obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. We calculated the annual RPEP recommendation rates for terrestrial animals by PHU for 2014 to 2016, and plotted the 2016 rates in relation to the year of the most recently identified rabid terrestrial animal in the PHU.\n\n\nResults\nBetween 2014 and 2016, the annual RPEP recommendation rates for terrestrial animal exposures by PHU ranged from 3.0 to 35.2 per 100,000 persons, with a median of 11.9 RPEP recommendations per 100,000 persons. In 2016, ten PHUs had not identified a rabid terrestrial animal in their jurisdiction for more than15 years. Five of these PHUs had RPEP recommendation rates above the provincial median.\n\n\nConclusion\nAlong with other factors, consideration of the occurrence of rabies in terrestrial animals in a jurisdiction can assist in the risk assessment of dogs, cats or ferrets that are not available for subsequent observation.","PeriodicalId":94304,"journal":{"name":"Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada","volume":"16 1","pages":"177-182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14745/CCDR.V45I78A02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The number of rabid terrestrial animals in Ontario has decreased markedly since the 1970s and 1980s. However, the number of recommended rabies postexposure prophylaxis (RPEP) courses has not decreased proportionally. The decision to recommend RPEP for terrestrial animal exposures should be based on a risk assessment that considers the prevalence of rabies in these animals within a jurisdiction, among other factors. Objective To explore trends in RPEP recommendations for exposures to terrestrial animals in Ontario in relation to the recency of terrestrial animal rabies cases by public health unit (PHU) jurisdiction. Methods RPEP recommendation data for the 36 Ontario PHUs were obtained from the Ontario integrated Public Health Information System and animal rabies data by PHU were obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. We calculated the annual RPEP recommendation rates for terrestrial animals by PHU for 2014 to 2016, and plotted the 2016 rates in relation to the year of the most recently identified rabid terrestrial animal in the PHU. Results Between 2014 and 2016, the annual RPEP recommendation rates for terrestrial animal exposures by PHU ranged from 3.0 to 35.2 per 100,000 persons, with a median of 11.9 RPEP recommendations per 100,000 persons. In 2016, ten PHUs had not identified a rabid terrestrial animal in their jurisdiction for more than15 years. Five of these PHUs had RPEP recommendation rates above the provincial median. Conclusion Along with other factors, consideration of the occurrence of rabies in terrestrial animals in a jurisdiction can assist in the risk assessment of dogs, cats or ferrets that are not available for subsequent observation.
加拿大安大略省人类狂犬病暴露后预防和狂犬病陆生动物:2014-2016年。
自20世纪70年代和80年代以来,安大略省患狂犬病的陆生动物数量显著减少。然而,推荐的狂犬病暴露后预防(RPEP)疗程的数量并没有按比例减少。就陆生动物接触建议RPEP的决定应基于风险评估,该评估应考虑管辖范围内这些动物的狂犬病流行情况以及其他因素。目的探讨安大略省公共卫生单位(PHU)管辖范围内陆生动物暴露RPEP建议的趋势与陆生动物狂犬病病例的关系。方法安大略省36只PHU的srpep推荐数据来自安大略省综合公共卫生信息系统,PHU的动物狂犬病数据来自自然资源和林业部。我们计算了2014年至2016年PHU对陆生动物的年度RPEP推荐率,并绘制了2016年率与PHU中最近发现的陆生动物狂犬病年份的关系图。结果2014 - 2016年,PHU对陆生动物暴露的年度RPEP推荐率为3.0 ~ 35.2 / 10万人,中位数为11.9 / 10万人。2016年,10个phu超过15年未在其管辖范围内发现患有狂犬病的陆生动物。其中5个phu的RPEP推荐率高于省级中位数。结论考虑辖区内陆生动物狂犬病发生情况及其他因素,有助于对无法进行后续观察的犬、猫或雪貂进行风险评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信